Total
5524 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-17624 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.1.0.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of OCG objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6435. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17623 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Link objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6434. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17621 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Format events. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6355. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17620 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Calculate events. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6353. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17619 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Validate events. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6352. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17618 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Selection Change events. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6336. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17617 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of onFocus events. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6335. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17616 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of onBlur events. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6334. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17615 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader 9.0.1.5096. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Mouse Exit events. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-6333. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17611 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Foxit PhantomPDF and Reader before 9.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (use-after-free) because properties of Annotation objects are mishandled. This relates to one of five distinct types of Annotation objects. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17610 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Foxit PhantomPDF and Reader before 9.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (use-after-free) because properties of Annotation objects are mishandled. This relates to one of five distinct types of Annotation objects. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17609 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Foxit PhantomPDF and Reader before 9.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (use-after-free) because properties of Annotation objects are mishandled. This relates to one of five distinct types of Annotation objects. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17608 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Foxit PhantomPDF and Reader before 9.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (use-after-free) because properties of Annotation objects are mishandled. This relates to one of five distinct types of Annotation objects. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17607 | 1 Foxitsoftware | 2 Phantompdf, Reader | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Foxit PhantomPDF and Reader before 9.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (use-after-free) because properties of Annotation objects are mishandled. This relates to one of five distinct types of Annotation objects. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17481 | 3 Debian, Google, Redhat | 5 Debian Linux, Chrome, Linux Desktop and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Incorrect object lifecycle handling in PDFium in Google Chrome prior to 71.0.3578.98 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted PDF file. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17479 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Incorrect object lifetime calculations in GPU code in Google Chrome prior to 70.0.3538.110 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17474 | 3 Debian, Google, Redhat | 5 Debian Linux, Chrome, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Use after free in HTMLImportsController in Blink in Google Chrome prior to 70.0.3538.67 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17465 | 3 Debian, Google, Redhat | 5 Debian Linux, Chrome, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Incorrect implementation of object trimming in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 70.0.3538.67 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit object corruption via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17462 | 3 Debian, Google, Redhat | 5 Debian Linux, Chrome, Linux Desktop and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| Incorrect refcounting in AppCache in Google Chrome prior to 70.0.3538.67 allowed a remote attacker to perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17457 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An object lifecycle issue in Blink could lead to a use after free in WebAudio in Google Chrome prior to 69.0.3497.81 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. | |||||