Filtered by vendor Gnupg
Subscribe
Total
55 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-24882 | 2 Gnupg, Gpg4win | 2 Gnupg, Gpg4win | 2026-07-15 | N/A | 8.4 HIGH |
| In GnuPG before 2.5.17, a stack-based buffer overflow exists in tpm2daemon during handling of the PKDECRYPT command for TPM-backed RSA and ECC keys. | |||||
| CVE-2026-24881 | 2 Gnupg, Gpg4win | 2 Gnupg, Gpg4win | 2026-07-15 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| In GnuPG before 2.5.17, a crafted CMS (S/MIME) EnvelopedData message carrying an oversized wrapped session key can cause a stack-based buffer overflow in gpg-agent during PKDECRYPT--kem=CMS handling. This can easily be leveraged for denial of service; however, there is also memory corruption that could lead to remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41989 | 1 Gnupg | 1 Libgcrypt | 2026-07-14 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Libgcrypt before 1.12.2 sometimes allows a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via crafted ECDH ciphertext to gcry_pk_decrypt. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41990 | 1 Gnupg | 1 Libgcrypt | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| Libgcrypt before 1.12.2 mishandles Dilithium signing. Writes to a static array lack a bounds check but do not use attacker-controlled data. | |||||
| CVE-2026-24883 | 2 Gnupg, Gpg4win | 2 Gnupg, Gpg4win | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.7 LOW |
| In GnuPG before 2.5.17, a long signature packet length causes parse_signature to return success with sig->data[] set to a NULL value, leading to a denial of service (application crash). | |||||
| CVE-2025-68973 | 1 Gnupg | 1 Gnupg | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In GnuPG before 2.4.9, armor_filter in g10/armor.c has two increments of an index variable where one is intended, leading to an out-of-bounds write for crafted input. (For ExtendedLTS, 2.2.51 and later are fixed versions.) | |||||
| CVE-2025-68972 | 1 Gnupg | 1 Gnupg | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| In GnuPG through 2.4.8, if a signed message has \f at the end of a plaintext line, an adversary can construct a modified message that places additional text after the signed material, such that signature verification of the modified message succeeds (although an "invalid armor" message is printed during verification). This is related to use of \f as a marker to denote truncation of a long plaintext line. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30258 | 1 Gnupg | 1 Gnupg | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 2.7 LOW |
| In GnuPG before 2.5.5, if a user chooses to import a certificate with certain crafted subkey data that lacks a valid backsig or that has incorrect usage flags, the user loses the ability to verify signatures made from certain other signing keys, aka a "verification DoS." | |||||
| CVE-2022-47629 | 2 Debian, Gnupg | 2 Debian Linux, Libksba | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Libksba before 1.6.3 is prone to an integer overflow vulnerability in the CRL signature parser. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3515 | 2 Gnupg, Gpg4win | 4 Gnupg, Libksba, Vs-desktop and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability was found in the Libksba library due to an integer overflow within the CRL parser. The vulnerability can be exploited remotely for code execution on the target system by passing specially crafted data to the application, for example, a malicious S/MIME attachment. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3219 | 1 Gnupg | 1 Gnupg | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.3 LOW |
| GnuPG can be made to spin on a relatively small input by (for example) crafting a public key with thousands of signatures attached, compressed down to just a few KB. | |||||
| CVE-2022-34903 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Gnupg and 1 more | 5 Debian Linux, Fedora, Gnupg and 2 more | 2026-06-17 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| GnuPG through 2.3.6, in unusual situations where an attacker possesses any secret-key information from a victim's keyring and other constraints (e.g., use of GPGME) are met, allows signature forgery via injection into the status line. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40528 | 1 Gnupg | 1 Libgcrypt | 2026-06-17 | 2.6 LOW | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The ElGamal implementation in Libgcrypt before 1.9.4 allows plaintext recovery because, during interaction between two cryptographic libraries, a certain dangerous combination of the prime defined by the receiver's public key, the generator defined by the receiver's public key, and the sender's ephemeral exponents can lead to a cross-configuration attack against OpenPGP. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3345 | 2 Gnupg, Oracle | 2 Libgcrypt, Communications Billing And Revenue Management | 2026-06-17 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| _gcry_md_block_write in cipher/hash-common.c in Libgcrypt version 1.9.0 has a heap-based buffer overflow when the digest final function sets a large count value. It is recommended to upgrade to 1.9.1 or later. | |||||
| CVE-2021-33560 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Gnupg and 1 more | 8 Debian Linux, Fedora, Libgcrypt and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Libgcrypt before 1.8.8 and 1.9.x before 1.9.3 mishandles ElGamal encryption because it lacks exponent blinding to address a side-channel attack against mpi_powm, and the window size is not chosen appropriately. This, for example, affects use of ElGamal in OpenPGP. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25125 | 2 Gnupg, Gpg4win | 2 Gnupg, Gpg4win | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| GnuPG 2.2.21 and 2.2.22 (and Gpg4win 3.1.12) has an array overflow, leading to a crash or possibly unspecified other impact, when a victim imports an attacker's OpenPGP key, and this key has AEAD preferences. The overflow is caused by a g10/key-check.c error. NOTE: GnuPG 2.3.x is unaffected. GnuPG 2.2.23 is a fixed version. | |||||
| CVE-2019-14855 | 3 Canonical, Fedoraproject, Gnupg | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Fedora, Gnupg | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in the way certificate signatures could be forged using collisions found in the SHA-1 algorithm. An attacker could use this weakness to create forged certificate signatures. This issue affects GnuPG versions before 2.2.18. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13050 | 5 F5, Fedoraproject, Gnupg and 2 more | 5 Traffix Signaling Delivery Controller, Fedora, Gnupg and 2 more | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Interaction between the sks-keyserver code through 1.2.0 of the SKS keyserver network, and GnuPG through 2.2.16, makes it risky to have a GnuPG keyserver configuration line referring to a host on the SKS keyserver network. Retrieving data from this network may cause a persistent denial of service, because of a Certificate Spamming Attack. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12904 | 2 Gnupg, Opensuse | 2 Libgcrypt, Leap | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| In Libgcrypt 1.8.4, the C implementation of AES is vulnerable to a flush-and-reload side-channel attack because physical addresses are available to other processes. (The C implementation is used on platforms where an assembly-language implementation is unavailable.) NOTE: the vendor's position is that the issue report cannot be validated because there is no description of an attack | |||||
| CVE-2018-9234 | 2 Canonical, Gnupg | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Gnupg | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| GnuPG 2.2.4 and 2.2.5 does not enforce a configuration in which key certification requires an offline master Certify key, which results in apparently valid certifications that occurred only with access to a signing subkey. | |||||