Filtered by vendor Eclipse
Subscribe
Total
206 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-2258 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Threadx Netx Duo | 2025-07-31 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In NetX Duo component HTTP server functionality of Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo before version 6.4.3, an attacker can cause an integer underflow and a subsequent denial of service by writing a very large file, by specially crafted packets with Content-Length smaller than the data request size. A possible workaround is to disable HTTP PUT support. This issue follows an uncomplete fix in CVE-2025-0728. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2259 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Threadx Netx Duo | 2025-07-31 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In NetX HTTP server functionality of Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo before version 6.4.3, an attacker can cause an integer underflow and a subsequent denial of service by writing a very large file, by specially crafted packets with Content-Length in one packet smaller than the data request size of the other packet. A possible workaround is to disable HTTP PUT support. This issue follows an incomplete fix of CVE-2025-0727 | |||||
| CVE-2024-10838 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Cyclone Data Distribution Service | 2025-07-31 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| An integer underflow during deserialization may allow any unauthenticated user to read out of bounds heap memory. This may result into secret data or pointers revealing the layout of the address space to be included into a deserialized data structure, which may potentially lead to thread crashes or cause denial of service conditions. | |||||
| CVE-2025-0728 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Threadx Netx Duo | 2025-07-31 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In NetX HTTP server functionality of Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo before version 6.4.2, an attacker can cause an integer underflow and a subsequent denial of service by writing a very large file, by specially crafted packets with Content-Length smaller than the data request size. A possible workaround is to disable HTTP PUT support. | |||||
| CVE-2025-0727 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Threadx Netx Duo | 2025-07-31 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In NetX HTTP server functionality of Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo before version 6.4.2, an attacker can cause an integer underflow and a subsequent denial of service by writing a very large file, by specially crafted packets with Content-Length in one packet smaller than the data request size of the other packet. A possible workaround is to disable HTTP PUT support. | |||||
| CVE-2025-0726 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Threadx Netx Duo | 2025-07-31 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In NetX HTTP server functionality of Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo before version 6.4.2, an attacker can cause a denial of service by specially crafted packets. The core issue is missing closing of a file in case of an error condition, resulting in the 404 error for each further file request. Users can work-around the issue by disabling the PUT request support. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2260 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Threadx Netx Duo | 2025-07-31 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In NetX HTTP server functionality of Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo before version 6.4.3, an attacker can cause a denial of service by specially crafted packets. The core issue is missing closing of a file in case of an error condition, resulting in the 404 error for each further file request. Users can work-around the issue by disabling the PUT request support. This issue follows an incomplete fix of CVE-2025-0726. | |||||
| CVE-2024-13009 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Jetty | 2025-07-31 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| In Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.0 to 9.4.56 a buffer can be incorrectly released when confronted with a gzip error when inflating a request body. This can result in corrupted and/or inadvertent sharing of data between requests. | |||||
| CVE-2025-1948 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Jetty | 2025-07-31 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Eclipse Jetty versions 12.0.0 to 12.0.16 included, an HTTP/2 client can specify a very large value for the HTTP/2 settings parameter SETTINGS_MAX_HEADER_LIST_SIZE. The Jetty HTTP/2 server does not perform validation on this setting, and tries to allocate a ByteBuffer of the specified capacity to encode HTTP responses, likely resulting in OutOfMemoryError being thrown, or even the JVM process exiting. | |||||
| CVE-2025-4447 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Openj9 | 2025-07-31 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Eclipse OpenJ9 versions up to 0.51, when used with OpenJDK version 8 a stack based buffer overflow can be caused by modifying a file on disk that is read when the JVM starts. | |||||
| CVE-2025-6705 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Open Vsx | 2025-07-31 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the Eclipse Open VSX Registry’s automated publishing system could have allowed unauthorized uploads of extensions. Specifically, the system’s build scripts were executed without proper isolation, potentially exposing a privileged token. This token enabled the publishing of new extension versions under any namespace, including those not controlled by an attacker. However, it did not permit deletion of existing extensions, overwriting of published versions, or access to administrative features of the registry. The issue was reported on May 4, 2025, fully resolved by June 24, and followed by a comprehensive audit. No evidence of compromise was found, though 81 extensions were proactively deactivated as a precaution. The standard publishing process remained unaffected. Recommendations have been issued to mitigate similar risks in the future. | |||||
| CVE-2025-1007 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Open Vsx | 2025-07-31 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In OpenVSX version v0.9.0 to v0.20.0, the /user/namespace/{namespace}/details API allows a user to edit all namespace details, even if the user is not a namespace Owner or Contributor. The details include: name, description, website, support link and social media links. The same issues existed in /user/namespace/{namespace}/details/logo and allowed a user to change the logo. | |||||
| CVE-2024-9823 | 2 Eclipse, Netapp | 4 Jetty, Active Iq Unified Manager, Bootstrap Os and 1 more | 2025-07-30 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| There exists a security vulnerability in Jetty's DosFilter which can be exploited by unauthorized users to cause remote denial-of-service (DoS) attack on the server using DosFilter. By repeatedly sending crafted requests, attackers can trigger OutofMemory errors and exhaust the server's memory finally. | |||||
| CVE-2024-10029 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Glassfish | 2025-07-16 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In Eclipse GlassFish version 7.0.15 is possible to perform Reflected Cross-site scripting attacks in the Administration Console. | |||||
| CVE-2024-10031 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Glassfish | 2025-07-16 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| In Eclipse GlassFish version 7.0.15 is possible to perform Stored Cross-site Scripting attacks by modifying the configuration file in the underlying operating system. | |||||
| CVE-2024-10032 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Glassfish | 2025-07-16 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| In Eclipse GlassFish version 7.0.15 is possible to perform Stored Cross-site scripting attacks in the Administration Console. | |||||
| CVE-2024-9342 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Glassfish | 2025-07-16 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Eclipse GlassFish version 7.0.16 or earlier it is possible to perform Login Brute Force attacks as there is no limitation in the number of failed login attempts. | |||||
| CVE-2024-9343 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Glassfish | 2025-07-16 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In Eclipse GlassFish version 7.0.15 is possible to perform Stored Cross-site scripting attacks in the Administration Console. | |||||
| CVE-2024-9408 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Glassfish | 2025-07-16 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Eclipse GlassFish since version 6.2.5 it is possible to perform a Server Side Request Forgery attack in specific endpoints. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6763 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Jetty | 2025-07-10 | N/A | 3.7 LOW |
| Eclipse Jetty is a lightweight, highly scalable, Java-based web server and Servlet engine . It includes a utility class, HttpURI, for URI/URL parsing. The HttpURI class does insufficient validation on the authority segment of a URI. However the behaviour of HttpURI differs from the common browsers in how it handles a URI that would be considered invalid if fully validated against the RRC. Specifically HttpURI and the browser may differ on the value of the host extracted from an invalid URI and thus a combination of Jetty and a vulnerable browser may be vulnerable to a open redirect attack or to a SSRF attack if the URI is used after passing validation checks. | |||||