CVE-2025-55085

In NextX Duo before 6.4.4, in the HTTP client module, the network support code for Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, the parsing of HTTP header fields was missing bounds verification. A crafted server response could cause undefined behavior.

CVSS v3 7.5 HIGH

7.5^/10

CVSS v3 : HIGH

Vector :

Exploitability : 3.9 / Impact : 3.6

Attack Vector NETWORK

Attack Complexity LOW

Privileges Required NONE

User Interaction NONE

Confidentiality Impact NONE

Integrity Impact NONE

Availability Impact HIGH

Scope UNCHANGED

References

Link	Resource
https://github.com/eclipse-threadx/netxduo/security/advisories/GHSA-9c77-rgp9-c2g2	Vendor Advisory Exploit

Configurations

Configuration 1 (hide)

cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:threadx_netx_duo:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

History

27 Oct 2025, 14:33

Type	Values Removed	Values Added
First Time		Eclipse threadx Netx Duo Eclipse
CPE		cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:threadx_netx_duo::::::::
CVSS	v2 : ~~unknown~~ v3 : ~~unknown~~	v2 : unknown v3 : 7.5
References	~~() https://github.com/eclipse-threadx/netxduo/security/advisories/GHSA-9c77-rgp9-c2g2 -~~	() https://github.com/eclipse-threadx/netxduo/security/advisories/GHSA-9c77-rgp9-c2g2 - Vendor Advisory, Exploit

17 Oct 2025, 15:15

Type	Values Removed	Values Added
New CVE

Information

Published : 2025-10-17 15:15

Updated : 2025-10-27 14:33

NVD link : CVE-2025-55085

Mitre link : CVE-2025-55085

CVE.ORG link : CVE-2025-55085

JSON object : View

Products Affected

eclipse

threadx_netx_duo

CWE

CWE-125

Out-of-bounds Read

CWE-1286

Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input

{"id": "CVE-2025-55085", "cveTags": [], "metrics": {"cvssMetricV31": [{"type": "Primary", "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "cvssData": {"scope": "UNCHANGED", "version": "3.1", "baseScore": 7.5, "attackVector": "NETWORK", "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "userInteraction": "NONE", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 3.6, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9}], "cvssMetricV40": [{"type": "Secondary", "source": "emo@eclipse.org", "cvssData": {"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED", "version": "4.0", "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED", "baseScore": 8.8, "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED", "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X", "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED", "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackRequirements": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE", "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED", "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE", "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH", "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED", "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE", "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE", "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED", "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED", "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED"}}]}, "published": "2025-10-17T15:15:38.907", "references": [{"url": "https://github.com/eclipse-threadx/netxduo/security/advisories/GHSA-9c77-rgp9-c2g2", "tags": ["Vendor Advisory", "Exploit"], "source": "emo@eclipse.org"}], "vulnStatus": "Analyzed", "weaknesses": [{"type": "Primary", "source": "emo@eclipse.org", "description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-125"}, {"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-1286"}]}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "In NextX Duo before 6.4.4, in the HTTP client module, the network support code for Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, the parsing of HTTP header fields was missing bounds verification. A crafted server response could cause undefined behavior."}], "lastModified": "2025-10-27T14:33:47.567", "configurations": [{"nodes": [{"negate": false, "cpeMatch": [{"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:threadx_netx_duo:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "24743F34-C00F-4CB2-BCEE-2BB29FA265CB", "versionEndExcluding": "6.4.4.202503"}], "operator": "OR"}]}], "sourceIdentifier": "emo@eclipse.org"}