Filtered by vendor Netapp
Subscribe
Total
2447 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-3450 | 10 Fedoraproject, Freebsd, Mcafee and 7 more | 35 Fedora, Freebsd, Web Gateway and 32 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j). | |||||
| CVE-2021-3449 | 12 Checkpoint, Debian, Fedoraproject and 9 more | 167 Multi-domain Management, Multi-domain Management Firmware, Quantum Security Gateway and 164 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j). | |||||
| CVE-2021-3426 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 3 more | 10 Debian Linux, Fedora, Cloud Backup and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.7 LOW | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| There's a flaw in Python 3's pydoc. A local or adjacent attacker who discovers or is able to convince another local or adjacent user to start a pydoc server could access the server and use it to disclose sensitive information belonging to the other user that they would not normally be able to access. The highest risk of this flaw is to data confidentiality. This flaw affects Python versions before 3.8.9, Python versions before 3.9.3 and Python versions before 3.10.0a7. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3281 | 3 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject, Netapp | 3 Django, Fedora, Snapcenter | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In Django 2.2 before 2.2.18, 3.0 before 3.0.12, and 3.1 before 3.1.6, the django.utils.archive.extract method (used by "startapp --template" and "startproject --template") allows directory traversal via an archive with absolute paths or relative paths with dot segments. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3177 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 2 more | 10 Debian Linux, Fedora, Active Iq Unified Manager and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Python 3.x through 3.9.1 has a buffer overflow in PyCArg_repr in _ctypes/callproc.c, which may lead to remote code execution in certain Python applications that accept floating-point numbers as untrusted input, as demonstrated by a 1e300 argument to c_double.from_param. This occurs because sprintf is used unsafely. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3115 | 4 Fedoraproject, Golang, Microsoft and 1 more | 5 Fedora, Go, Windows and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.1 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Go before 1.14.14 and 1.15.x before 1.15.7 on Windows is vulnerable to Command Injection and remote code execution when using the "go get" command to fetch modules that make use of cgo (for example, cgo can execute a gcc program from an untrusted download). | |||||
| CVE-2021-3114 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Golang and 1 more | 5 Debian Linux, Fedora, Go and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Go before 1.14.14 and 1.15.x before 1.15.7, crypto/elliptic/p224.go can generate incorrect outputs, related to an underflow of the lowest limb during the final complete reduction in the P-224 field. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39293 | 2 Golang, Netapp | 2 Go, Cloud Insights Telegraf | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In archive/zip in Go before 1.16.8 and 1.17.x before 1.17.1, a crafted archive header (falsely designating that many files are present) can cause a NewReader or OpenReader panic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2021-33196. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39047 | 2 Ibm, Netapp | 3 Cognos Analytics, Planning Analytics, Oncommand Insight | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 and IBM Cognos Analytics 11.2.1, 11.2.0, and 11.1.7 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 214349. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39045 | 2 Ibm, Netapp | 2 Cognos Analytics, Oncommand Insight | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.0, and 11.2.1 could allow a local attacker to obtain information due to the autocomplete feature on password input fields. IBM X-Force ID: 214345. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39009 | 2 Ibm, Netapp | 2 Cognos Analytics, Oncommand Insight | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.0, and 11.2.1 stores user credentials in plain clear text which can be read by a local privileged user. IBM X-Force ID: 213554. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39002 | 6 Hp, Ibm, Linux and 3 more | 7 Hp-ux, Aix, Db2 and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM DB2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows (includes DB2 Connect Server) 9.7, 10.1, 10.5, 11.1, and 11.5 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38946 | 2 Ibm, Netapp | 2 Cognos Analytics, Oncommand Insight | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.0, and 11.1.7 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 211240. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38945 | 2 Ibm, Netapp | 2 Cognos Analytics, Oncommand Insight | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Cognos Analytics 11.2.1, 11.2.0, and 11.1.7 could allow a remote attacker to upload arbitrary files, caused by improper content validation. IBM X-Force ID: 211238. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38931 | 6 Hp, Ibm, Linux and 3 more | 7 Hp-ux, Aix, Db2 and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows (includes DB2 Connect Server) 11.1, and 11.5 is vulnerable to an information disclosure as a result of a connected user having indirect read access to a table where they are not authorized to select from. IBM X-Force ID: 210418. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38926 | 6 Hp, Ibm, Linux and 3 more | 7 Hp-ux, Aix, Db2 and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows (includes Db2 Connect Server) 9.7, 10.1, 10.5, 11.1, and 11.5 could allow a local user to gain privileges due to allowing modification of columns of existing tasks. IBM X-Force ID: 210321. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38909 | 2 Ibm, Netapp | 2 Cognos Analytics, Oncommand Insight | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7 and 11.2.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 209706. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38905 | 2 Ibm, Netapp | 2 Cognos Analytics, Oncommand Insight | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.0, and 11.1.7 could allow an authenticated user to view report pages that they should not have access to. IBM X-Force ID: 209697. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38904 | 2 Ibm, Netapp | 2 Cognos Analytics, Oncommand Insight | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.0, and 11.1.7 could allow a remote attacker to obtain credentials from a user's browser via incorrect autocomplete settings. IBM X-Force ID: 209693. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38903 | 2 Ibm, Netapp | 2 Cognos Analytics, Oncommand Insight | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7, 11.2.0, and 11.1.7 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject malicious script into a Web page which would be executed in a victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting Web site, once the URL is clicked. An attacker could use this vulnerability to steal the victim's cookie-based authentication credentials. IBM X-Force ID: 209691. | |||||