Total
9305 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-48574 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.4 HIGH |
| In validateAddingWindowLw of DisplayPolicy.java, there is a possible way for an app to intercept drag-and-drop events due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48573 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In sendCommand of MediaSessionRecord.java, there is a possible way to launch the foreground service while the app is in the background due to FGS while-in-use abuse. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48572 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to launch activities from the background due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48569 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible permanent denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48568 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible lockscreen bypass due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48567 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible bypass of a file path filter designed to prevent access to sensitive directories due to incorrect unicode normalization. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48566 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible bypass of user profile boundary with a forwarded intent due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48565 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to bypass the cross profile intent filter due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48564 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.0 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible intent filter bypass due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48563 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In onNullBinding of RemoteFillService.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48562 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| In writeContent of RemotePrintDocument.java, there is a possible information disclosure due to a logic error. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48561 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to access data displayed on the screen due to side channel information disclosure. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48560 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In AndroidManifest.xml, there is a possible way for an app to monitor motion events due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48559 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In multiple functions of AppOpsService.java, there is a possible add a large amount of app ops due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48558 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple functions of BatteryService.java, there is a possible way to hijack implicit intent intended for system app due to Implicit intent hijacking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48556 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| In multiple methods of NotificationChannel.java, there is a possible desynchronization from persistence due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48555 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple functions of NotificationStation.java, there is a possible cross-profile information disclosure due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48554 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In handlePackagesChanged of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48553 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In handlePackagesChanged of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible DoS of a device admin due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48552 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In saveGlobalProxyLocked of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible way to desync from persistence due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||