Total
9305 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-48615 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In getComponentName of MediaButtonReceiverHolder.java, there is a possible desync in persistence due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48614 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| In rebootWipeUserData of RecoverySystem.java, there is a possible way to factory reset the device while in DSU mode due to a missing permission check. This could lead to physical denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48613 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In VBMeta, there is a possible way to modify and resign VBMeta using a test key, assuming the original image was previously signed with the same key. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48612 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In setDefaultKey of DefaultPaymentSettings.java, there is a possible way for an application to set the main user's default NFC payment setting due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48611 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| In DeviceId of DeviceId.java, there is a possible desync in persistence due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48610 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In __pkvm_guest_relinquish_to_host of mem_protect.c, there is a possible configuration data leak due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48609 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| In multiple functions of MmsProvider.java, there is a possible way to arbitrarily delete files which affect telephony, SMS, and MMS functionalities due to a path traversal error. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48608 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In isValidMediaUri of SettingsProvider.java, there is a possible cross user media read due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48607 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to create a large amount of app ops due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48606 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In preparePackage of InstallPackageHelper.java, there is a possible way for an app to appear hidden upon installation without a mechanism to uninstall it due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48605 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.4 HIGH |
| In multiple functions of KeyguardViewMediator.java, there is a possible lockscreen bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48604 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to read files from another user due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48603 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In InputMethodInfo of InputMethodInfo.java, there is a possible permanent denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48602 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.4 HIGH |
| In exitKeyguardAndFinishSurfaceBehindRemoteAnimation of KeyguardViewMediator.java, there is a possible lockscreen bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48601 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible permanent denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48600 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In multiple files, there is a possible way to reveal information across users due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48599 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple functions of WifiScanModeActivity.java, there is a possible way to bypass a device config restriction due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48598 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to alter the primary user's face unlock settings due to a confused deputy. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48597 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to trick a user into accepting a permission due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48596 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In appendFrom of Parcel.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||