Total
9177 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-26436 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In clearAllowBgActivityStarts of PendingIntentRecord.java, there is a possible way for an application to launch an activity from the background due to BAL Bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26435 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26434 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In libxml2, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a buffer overflow. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26432 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to persistently DoS the device due to a missing length check. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26431 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In setupAccessibilityServices of AccessibilityFragment.java, there is a possible way to hide an enabled accessibility service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26430 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In getDestinationForApp of SpaAppBridgeActivity, there is a possible cross-user file reveal due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26429 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In collectOps of AppOpsService.java, there is a possible way to cause permanent DoS due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26428 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.2 LOW |
| In startLockTaskMode of LockTaskController.java, there is a possible lock screen bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26427 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible Android/data access due to a path traversal error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26426 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.1 MEDIUM |
| In BroadcastController.java of registerReceiverWithFeatureTraced, there is a possible way to receive broadcasts meant for the "android" package due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26425 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| In multiple functions of RoleService.java, there is a possible permission squatting vulnerability due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege on versions of Android where android.permission.MANAGE_DEFAULT_APPLICATIONS was not defined with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26424 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| In multiple functions of VpnManager.java, there is a possible cross-user data leak due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26423 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| In validateIpConfiguration of WifiConfigurationUtil.java, there is a possible way to trigger a permanent DoS due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26422 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| In dump of WindowManagerService.java, there is a possible way of running dumpsys without the required permission due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26421 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible lock screen bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26420 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| In multiple functions of GrantPermissionsActivity.java , there is a possible way to trick the user into granting the incorrect permission due to permission overload. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26419 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.3 LOW |
| In initPhoneSwitch of SystemSettingsFragment.java, there is a possible FRP bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26418 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In setUserDisclaimerAcknowledged of CarDevicePolicyService.java, there is a possible way to bypass the user dialog when adding an account to a managed device due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26417 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| In checkWhetherCallingAppHasAccess of DownloadProvider.java, there is a possible bypass of user consent when opening files in shared storage due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26416 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In initializeSwizzler of SkBmpStandardCodec.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||