Total
6020 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-41497 | 1 Praison | 1 Praisonai | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.6.9, the fix for PraisonAI's MCP command handling does not add a command allowlist or argument validation to parse_mcp_command(), allowing arbitrary executables like bash, python, or /bin/sh with inline code execution flags to pass through to subprocess execution. This issue has been patched in version 4.6.9. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41421 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.6.5, SiYuan desktop renders notification messages as raw HTML inside an Electron renderer. The notification route POST /api/notification/pushMsg accepts a user-controlled msg value, forwards it through the backend broadcast layer, and the frontend inserts it into the DOM with insertAdjacentHTML(...) at message.ts. On desktop builds, this is not limited to ordinary XSS. Electron windows are created with nodeIntegration: true, contextIsolation: false, and webSecurity: false at main.js. As a result, JavaScript executed from the notification sink can directly access Node APIs and escalate to desktop code execution. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.6.5. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41411 | 1 Vim | 1 Vim | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0357, A command injection vulnerability exists in Vim's tag file processing. When resolving a tag, the filename field from the tags file is passed through wildcard expansion to resolve environment variables and wildcards. If the filename field contains backtick syntax (e.g., `command`), Vim executes the embedded command via the system shell with the full privileges of the running user. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41315 | 1 Midoks | 1 Mdserver-web | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| mdserver-web is a simple Linux panel. From 0.18.0 to 0.18.4, mdserver-web has a front-end unauthorized remote command execution vulnerability. Due to the lack of authentication on the /modify_crond and /start_task interfaces, it is possible to modify the default built-in scheduled tasks and start them, achieving RCE. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41247 | 1 Std42 | 1 Elfinder | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| elFinder is an open-source file manager for web, written in JavaScript using jQuery UI. Prior to 2.1.67, elFinder contains a command injection vulnerability in the resize command. The bg (background color) parameter is accepted from user input and passed through image resize/rotate processing. In configurations that use the ImageMagick CLI backend, this value is incorporated into shell command strings without sufficient escaping. An attacker able to invoke the resize command with a crafted bg value may achieve arbitrary command execution as the web server process user. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.1.67. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41208 | 1 Paperclip | 1 Paperclipai | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Paperclip is a Node.js server and React UI that orchestrates a team of AI agents to run a business. Versions of @paperclipai/server prior to 2026.416.0 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows an attacker with an Agent API key to execute arbitrary OS commands on the Paperclip server host. An attacker with an agent credential can escalate privileges from the agent runtime to the Paperclip server host. The vulnerability occurs because agents are allowed to update their own adapterConfig via the /agents/:id API endpoint. The configuration field adapterConfig.workspaceStrategy.provisionCommand is later executed by the server runtime. As a result, an attacker controlling an agent credential can inject arbitrary shell commands which are executed by the Paperclip server during workspace provisioning. This breaks the intended trust boundary between agent runtime configuration and server host execution, allowing a compromised or malicious agent to escalate privileges and run commands on the host system. This vulnerability allows remote code execution on the server host. @paperclipai/server version 2026.416.0 fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41113 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH | ||
| sagredo qmail before 2026.04.07 allows tls_quit remote code execution because of popen in notlshosts_auto in qmail-remote.c. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41064 | 1 Wwbn | 1 Avideo | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.3 CRITICAL |
| WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions up to and including 29.0, an incomplete fix for AVideo's `test.php` adds `escapeshellarg` for wget but leaves the `file_get_contents` and `curl` code paths unsanitized, and the URL validation regex `/^http/` accepts strings like `httpevil[.]com`. Commit 78bccae74634ead68aa6528d631c9ec4fd7aa536 contains an updated fix. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41036 | 1 Qntmnet | 2 Qn-i-470, Qn-i-470 Firmware | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability exists in Quantum Networks router due to inadequate sanitization of user-supplied input in the management CLI interface. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting arbitrary OS commands on the targeted device. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to perform remote code execution with root privileges on the targeted device. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41015 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH | ||
| radare2 before 9236f44, when configured on UNIX without SSL, allows command injection via a PDB name to rabin2 -PP. NOTE: although users are supposed to use the latest version from git (not a release), the date range for the vulnerable code was less than a week, occurring after 6.1.2 but before 6.1.3. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40933 | 1 Flowiseai | 1 Flowise | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. Prior to 3.1.0, due to unsafe serialization of stdio commands in the MCP adapter, an authenticated attacker can add an MCP stdio server with an arbitrary command, achieving command execution. The vulnerability lies in a bug in the input sanitization from the “Custom MCP” configuration in http://localhost:3000/canvas - where any user can add a new MCP, when doing so - adding a new MCP using stdio, the user can add any command, even though your code have input sanitization checks such as validateCommandInjection and validateArgsForLocalFileAccess, and a list of predefined specific safe commands - these commands, for example "npx" can be combined with code execution arguments ("-c touch /tmp/pwn") that enable direct code execution on the underlying OS. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.0. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40852 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| A highly authenticated attacker can alter the config generator injecting a payload into future created configurations. The device is not correctly checking this configuration value before passing it to an system execute leading to code execution. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality, integrity and availability. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40517 | 1 Radare | 1 Radare2 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| radare2 prior to 6.1.4 contains a command injection vulnerability in the PDB parser's print_gvars() function that allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands by crafting a malicious PDB file with newline characters in symbol names. Attackers can inject arbitrary radare2 commands through unsanitized symbol name interpolation in the flag rename command, which are then executed when a user runs the idp command against the malicious PDB file, enabling arbitrary OS command execution through radare2's shell execution operator. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40499 | 1 Radare | 1 Radare2 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| radare2 prior to version 6.1.4 contains a command injection vulnerability in the PDB parser's print_gvars() function that allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands by embedding a newline byte in the PE section header name field. Attackers can craft a malicious PDB file with specially crafted section names to inject r2 commands that are executed when the idp command processes the file. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40288 | 1 Praison | 2 Praisonai, Praisonaiagents | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. In versions below 4.5.139 of PraisonAI and 1.5.140 of praisonaiagents, the workflow engine is vulnerable to arbitrary command and code execution through untrusted YAML files. When praisonai workflow run <file.yaml> loads a YAML file with type: job, the JobWorkflowExecutor in job_workflow.py processes steps that support run: (shell commands via subprocess.run()), script: (inline Python via exec()), and python: (arbitrary Python script execution)—all without any validation, sandboxing, or user confirmation. The affected code paths include action_run() in workflow.py and _exec_shell(), _exec_inline_python(), and _exec_python_script() in job_workflow.py. An attacker who can supply or influence a workflow YAML file (particularly in CI pipelines, shared repositories, or multi-tenant deployment environments) can achieve full arbitrary command execution on the host system, compromising the machine and any accessible data or credentials. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.5.139 of PraisonAI and 1.5.140 of praisonaiagents. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40111 | 1 Praison | 1 Praisonaiagents | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| PraisonAIAgents is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 1.5.128, he memory hooks executor in praisonaiagents passes a user-controlled command string directly to subprocess.run() with shell=True at src/praisonai-agents/praisonaiagents/memory/hooks.py. No sanitization is performed and shell metacharacters are interpreted by /bin/sh before the intended command executes. Two independent attack surfaces exist. The first is via pre_run_command and post_run_command hook event types registered through the hooks configuration. The second and more severe surface is the .praisonai/hooks.json lifecycle configuration, where hooks registered for events such as BEFORE_TOOL and AFTER_TOOL fire automatically during agent operation. An agent that gains file-write access through prompt injection can overwrite .praisonai/hooks.json and have its payload execute silently at every subsequent lifecycle event without further user interaction. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.5.128. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40088 | 1 Praison | 1 Praisonai | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 4.5.121, the execute_command function and workflow shell execution are exposed to user-controlled input via agent workflows, YAML definitions, and LLM-generated tool calls, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands through shell metacharacters. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.5.121. | |||||
| CVE-2026-3964 | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A weakness has been identified in OpenAkita up to 1.24.3. This impacts the function run of the file src/openakita/tools/shell.py of the component Chat API Endpoint. Executing a manipulation of the argument Message can lead to os command injection. The attack is restricted to local execution. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2026-3959 | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability was found in 0xKoda WireMCP up to 7f45f8b2b4adeb76be8c6227eefb38533fdd6b1e. Impacted is the function server.tool of the file index.js of the component Tshark CLI Command Handler. The manipulation results in os command injection. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | |||||
| CVE-2026-3841 | 1 Tp-link | 2 Tl-mr6400, Tl-mr6400 Firmware | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A command injection vulnerability has been identified in the Telnet command-line interface (CLI) of TP-Link TL-MR6400 v5.3. This issue is caused by insufficient sanitization of data processed during specific CLI operations. An authenticated attacker with elevated privileges may be able to execute arbitrary system commands. Successful exploitation may lead to full device compromise, including potential loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. | |||||