Total
444 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-52318 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Incorrect object recycling and reuse vulnerability in Apache Tomcat. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: 11.0.0, 10.1.31, 9.0.96. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.1, 10.1.32 or 9.0.97, which fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-52317 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Incorrect object re-cycling and re-use vulnerability in Apache Tomcat. Incorrect recycling of the request and response used by HTTP/2 requests could lead to request and/or response mix-up between users. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M23 through 11.0.0-M26, from 10.1.27 through 10.1.30, from 9.0.92 through 9.0.95. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.0, 10.1.31 or 9.0.96, which fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-50550 | 1 Litespeedtech | 1 Litespeed Cache | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in LiteSpeed Technologies LiteSpeed Cache litespeed-cache allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects LiteSpeed Cache: from n/a through <= 6.5.1. | |||||
| CVE-2024-47182 | 1 Amirraminfar | 1 Dozzle | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| Dozzle is a realtime log viewer for docker containers. Before version 8.5.3, the app uses sha-256 as the hash for passwords, which leaves users susceptible to rainbow table attacks. The app switches to bcrypt, a more appropriate hash for passwords, in version 8.5.3. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45719 | 1 Apache | 1 Answer | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 2.6 LOW |
| Inadequate Encryption Strength vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 1.4.0. The ids generated using the UUID v1 version are to some extent not secure enough. It can cause the generated token to be predictable. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.4.1, which fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45394 | 1 Authenticator | 1 Authenticator | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Authenticator is a browser extension that generates two-step verification codes. In versions 7.0.0 and below, encryption keys for user data were stored encrypted at-rest using only AES-256 and the EVP_BytesToKey KDF. Therefore, attackers with a copy of a user's data are able to brute-force the user's encryption key. Users on version 8.0.0 and above are automatically migrated away from the weak encoding on first login. Users should destroy encrypted backups made with versions prior to 8.0.0. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45273 | 2 Helmholz, Mbconnectline | 27 Myrex24 V2 Virtual Server, Rex 100, Rex 100 Firmware and 24 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.4 HIGH |
| An unauthenticated local attacker can decrypt the devices config file and therefore compromise the device due to a weak implementation of the encryption used. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45259 | 1 Gl-inet | 42 A1300, A1300 Firmware, Ar300m and 39 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered on certain GL-iNet devices, including MT6000, MT3000, MT2500, AXT1800, and AX1800 4.6.2. By intercepting an HTTP request and changing the filename property in the download interface, any file on the device can be deleted. | |||||
| CVE-2024-43382 | 1 Snowflake | 1 Snowflake Jdbc | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Snowflake JDBC driver versions >= 3.2.6 and <= 3.19.1 have an Incorrect Security Setting that can result in data being uploaded to an encrypted stage without the additional layer of protection provided by client side encryption. | |||||
| CVE-2024-42177 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Dryice Myxalytics | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 2.6 LOW |
| HCL MyXalytics is affected by SSL∕TLS Protocol affected with BREACH & LUCKY13 vulnerabilities. Attackers can exploit the weakness in the ciphers to intercept and decrypt encrypted data, steal sensitive information, or inject malicious code into the system. | |||||
| CVE-2024-42163 | 1 Fiware | 1 Keyrock | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.3 HIGH |
| Insufficiently random values for generating password reset token in FIWARE Keyrock <= 8.4 allow attackers to take over the account of any user by predicting the token for the password reset link. | |||||
| CVE-2024-41681 | 1 Siemens | 1 Location Intelligence | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Location Intelligence family (All versions < V4.4). The web server of affected products is configured to support weak ciphers by default. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker in an on-path position to to read and modify any data passed over the connection between legitimate clients and the affected device. | |||||
| CVE-2024-41594 | 1 Draytek | 48 Vigor1000b, Vigor1000b Firmware, Vigor165 and 45 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue in DrayTek Vigor310 devices through 4.3.2.6 allows an attacker to obtain sensitive information because the httpd server of the Vigor management UI uses a static string for seeding the PRNG of OpenSSL. | |||||
| CVE-2024-40761 | 1 Apache | 1 Answer | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Inadequate Encryption Strength vulnerability in Apache Answer. This issue affects Apache Answer: through 1.3.5. Using the MD5 value of a user's email to access Gravatar is insecure and can lead to the leakage of user email. The official recommendation is to use SHA256 instead. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.4.0, which fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-40719 | 1 Changingtec | 1 Tcb Servisign | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The encryption strength of the authorization keys in CHANGING Information Technology TCBServiSign Windows Version is insufficient. When a remote attacker tricks a victim into visiting a malicious website, TCBServiSign will treat that website as a legitimate server and interact with it. | |||||
| CVE-2024-39928 | 1 Apache | 1 Linkis | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Apache Linkis <= 1.5.0, a Random string security vulnerability in Spark EngineConn, random string generated by the Token when starting Py4j uses the Commons Lang's RandomStringUtils. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.6.0, which fixes this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-38867 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SA84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SD84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.1) (All versions < V9.62 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.1) (All versions installed on CP200 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.1) (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 1) (All versions installed on CP200 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 1) (All versions < V9.62 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 1) (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO (All versions < V9.62), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V9.64). The affected devices are supporting weak ciphers on several ports (443/tcp for web, 4443/tcp for DIGSI 5 and configurable port for syslog over TLS). This could allow an unauthorized attacker in a man-in-the-middle position to decrypt any data passed over to and from those ports. | |||||
| CVE-2024-38341 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling Secure Proxy | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.0.0 through 6.0.3.1, 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.0.0, and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2024-38277 | 2 Fedoraproject, Moodle | 2 Fedora, Moodle | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A unique key should be generated for a user's QR login key and their auto-login key, so the same key cannot be used interchangeably between the two. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37034 | 1 Couchbase | 1 Couchbase Server | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Couchbase Server before 7.2.5 and 7.6.0 before 7.6.1. It does not ensure that credentials are negotiated with the Key-Value (KV) service using SCRAM-SHA when remote link encryption is configured for Half-Secure. | |||||