Total
11572 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-0179 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH | ||
| SMM Callout vulnerability within the AmdCpmDisplayFeatureSMM driver could allow locally authenticated attackers to overwrite SMRAM, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2024-0161 | 1 Dell | 172 Dss 8440, Dss 8440 Firmware, Emc Storage Nx3240 and 169 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| Dell PowerEdge Server BIOS and Dell Precision Rack BIOS contain an Improper SMM communication buffer verification vulnerability. A local low privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability leading to arbitrary writes to SMRAM. | |||||
| CVE-2024-0158 | 1 Dell | 776 Alienware M15 R6, Alienware M15 R6 Firmware, Alienware M15 R7 and 773 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.1 MEDIUM |
| Dell BIOS contains an improper input validation vulnerability. A local authenticated malicious user with admin privileges may potentially exploit this vulnerability to modify a UEFI variable, leading to denial of service and escalation of privileges | |||||
| CVE-2024-0127 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH | ||
| NVIDIA vGPU software contains a vulnerability in the GPU kernel driver of the vGPU Manager for all supported hypervisors, where a user of the guest OS can cause an improper input validation by compromising the guest OS kernel. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, escalation of privileges, data tampering, denial of service, and information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2024-0126 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH | ||
| NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability which could allow a privileged attacker to escalate permissions. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering. | |||||
| CVE-2024-0112 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin™ and NVIDIA IGX Orin software contain a vulnerability where an attacker can cause an improper input validation issue by escalating certain permissions to a limited degree. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, data corruption, information disclosure, or escalation of privilege. | |||||
| CVE-2024-0057 | 1 Microsoft | 17 .net, .net Framework, Powershell and 14 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| NET, .NET Framework, and Visual Studio Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-0045 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In smp_proc_sec_req of smp_act.cc, there is a possible out of bounds read due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-0031 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In attp_build_read_by_type_value_cmd of att_protocol.cc , there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-0022 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In multiple functions of CompanionDeviceManagerService.java, there is a possible launch NotificationAccessConfirmationActivity of another user profile due to improper input validation. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-0021 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In onCreate of NotificationAccessConfirmationActivity.java, there is a possible way for an app in the work profile to enable notification listener services due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2023-7248 | 1 Opentext | 1 Vertica | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| Certain functionality in OpenText Vertica Management console might be prone to bypass via crafted requests. The vulnerability would affect one of Vertica’s authentication functionalities by allowing specially crafted requests and sequences. This issue impacts the following Vertica Management Console versions: 10.x 11.1.1-24 or lower 12.0.4-18 or lower Please upgrade to one of the following Vertica Management Console versions: 10.x to upgrade to latest versions from below. 11.1.1-25 12.0.4-19 23.x 24.x | |||||
| CVE-2023-7240 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.8 MEDIUM | ||
| An improper authorization level has been detected in the login panel. It may lead to unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery and allows to perform open services enumeration. Server makes query to provided server (Server IP/DNS field) and is triggering connection to arbitrary address. | |||||
| CVE-2023-7060 | 1 Zephyrproject | 1 Zephyr | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.6 HIGH |
| Zephyr OS IP packet handling does not properly drop IP packets arriving on an external interface with a source address equal to 127.0.01 or the destination address. | |||||
| CVE-2023-7012 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| Insufficient data validation in Permission Prompts in Google Chrome prior to 117.0.5938.62 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious app to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a malicious file. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2023-6937 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one (D)TLS record do not span key boundaries. As a result, it was possible to combine (D)TLS messages using different keys into one (D)TLS record. The most extreme edge case is that, in (D)TLS 1.3, it was possible that an unencrypted (D)TLS 1.3 record from the server containing first a ServerHello message and then the rest of the first server flight would be accepted by a wolfSSL client. In (D)TLS 1.3 the handshake is encrypted after the ServerHello but a wolfSSL client would accept an unencrypted flight from the server. This does not compromise key negotiation and authentication so it is assigned a low severity rating. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6835 | 1 Wso2 | 2 Api Manager, Iot Server | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Multiple WSO2 products have been identified as vulnerable due to lack of server-side input validation in the Forum feature, API rating could be manipulated. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6781 | 1 Themeisle | 1 Orbit Fox | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| The Orbit Fox by ThemeIsle plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's custom fields in all versions up to, and including, 2.10.26 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied values. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with contributor-level and above permissions to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6738 | 1 Pagelayer | 1 Pagelayer | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The Page Builder: Pagelayer – Drag and Drop website builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'pagelayer_header_code', 'pagelayer_body_open_code', and 'pagelayer_footer_code' meta fields in all versions up to, and including, 1.7.8 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with contributor-level and above permissions to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This appears to be a reintroduction of a vulnerability patched in version 1.7.7. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6395 | 2 Fedoraproject, Rpm-software-management | 3 Extra Packages For Enterprise Linux, Fedora, Mock | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| The Mock software contains a vulnerability wherein an attacker could potentially exploit privilege escalation, enabling the execution of arbitrary code with root user privileges. This weakness stems from the absence of proper sandboxing during the expansion and execution of Jinja2 templates, which may be included in certain configuration parameters. While the Mock documentation advises treating users added to the mock group as privileged, certain build systems invoking mock on behalf of users might inadvertently permit less privileged users to define configuration tags. These tags could then be passed as parameters to mock during execution, potentially leading to the utilization of Jinja2 templates for remote privilege escalation and the execution of arbitrary code as the root user on the build server. | |||||