Filtered by vendor Langflow
Subscribe
Total
39 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-7524 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-06-02 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.1 could allow remote code execution due to improper validation of symbolic links during archive extraction. | |||||
| CVE-2026-7528 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-06-02 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.0 could allow a denial of service due to uncontrolled resource consumption. | |||||
| CVE-2026-33017 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-05-22 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. In versions prior to 1.9.0, the POST /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow endpoint allows building public flows without requiring authentication. When the optional data parameter is supplied, the endpoint uses attacker-controlled flow data (containing arbitrary Python code in node definitions) instead of the stored flow data from the database. This code is passed to exec() with zero sandboxing, resulting in unauthenticated remote code execution. This is distinct from CVE-2025-3248, which fixed /api/v1/validate/code by adding authentication. The build_public_tmp endpoint is designed to be unauthenticated (for public flows) but incorrectly accepts attacker-supplied flow data containing arbitrary executable code. This issue has been fixed in version 1.9.0. | |||||
| CVE-2025-34291 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-05-22 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise. | |||||
| CVE-2026-42048 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-05-14 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to 1.9.0, Langflow is vulnerable to Path Traversal in the Knowledge Bases API (DELETE /api/v1/knowledge_bases). This occurs because user-supplied knowledge base names are concatenated directly into file paths without proper sanitization or boundary validation. An authenticated attacker can exploit this flaw to delete arbitrary directories anywhere on the server's filesystem, leading to data loss and potential service disruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.9.0. | |||||
| CVE-2026-4503 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow Desktop | 2026-05-11 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 Langflow could allow an unauthenticated user to view other users' images due to an indirect object reference through a user-controlled key. | |||||
| CVE-2026-4502 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow Desktop | 2026-05-11 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Langflow Desktop 1.2.0 through 1.8.4 Langflow could allow an authenticated attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to write arbitrary files on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2026-3346 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow Desktop | 2026-05-11 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Langflow Desktop 1.6.0 through 1.8.4 Lanflow is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | |||||
| CVE-2026-3340 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow Desktop | 2026-05-11 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 IBM Langflow is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2026-3345 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow Desktop | 2026-05-11 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Langflow Desktop <=1.8.4 Langflow could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to view arbitrary files on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6543 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow Desktop | 2026-05-11 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 Langflow allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the process running Langflow. This allows reading sensitive environment variables (API keys, DB credentials), modifying files, or launching further attacks on the internal network. | |||||
| CVE-2026-34046 | 1 Langflow | 2 Langflow, Langflow-base | 2026-05-11 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to version 1.5.1, the `_read_flow` helper in `src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/flows.py` branched on the `AUTO_LOGIN` setting to decide whether to filter by `user_id`. When `AUTO_LOGIN` was `False` (i.e., authentication was enabled), neither branch enforced an ownership check — the query returned any flow matching the given UUID regardless of who owned it. This allowed any authenticated user to read any other user's flow, including embedded plaintext API keys; modify the logic of another user's AI agents, and/or delete flows belonging to other users. The vulnerability was introduced by the conditional logic that was meant to accommodate public/example flows (those with `user_id = NULL`) under auto-login mode, but inadvertently left the authenticated path without an ownership filter. The fix in version 1.5.1 removes the `AUTO_LOGIN` conditional entirely and unconditionally scopes the query to the requesting user. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6542 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-05-04 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 could allow any user to supply a flow_id to read transaction logs and vertex build data belonging to other users, and to delete persisted vertex build data for another user's flow. | |||||
| CVE-2026-5026 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-04-20 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The '/api/v1/files/images/{flow_id}/{file_name}' endpoint serves SVG files with the 'image/svg+xml' content type without sanitizing their content. Since SVG files can contain embedded JavaScript, an attacker can upload a malicious SVG that executes arbitrary JavaScript when viewed by other users, leading to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). This allows stealing authentication tokens stored in cookies, including JWT access and refresh tokens. | |||||
| CVE-2026-5025 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-04-20 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The '/logs' and '/logs-stream' endpoints in the log router allow any authenticated user to read the full application log buffer. These endpoints only require basic authentication ('get_current_active_user') without any privilege checks (e.g., 'is_superuser'). | |||||
| CVE-2026-5022 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-04-20 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The '/api/v1/files/images/{flow_id}/{file_name}' endpoint does not enforce any authentication or authorization checks, allowing any unauthenticated user to download images belonging to any flow by knowing (or guessing) the flow ID and file name. | |||||
| CVE-2026-3357 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-04-14 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM Langflow Desktop 1.6.0 through 1.8.2 Langflow could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by an insecure default setting which permits the deserialization of untrusted data in the FAISS component. | |||||
| CVE-2026-33873 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-04-03 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to version 1.9.0, the Agentic Assistant feature in Langflow executes LLM-generated Python code during its validation phase. Although this phase appears intended to validate generated component code, the implementation reaches dynamic execution sinks and instantiates the generated class server-side. In deployments where an attacker can access the Agentic Assistant feature and influence the model output, this can result in arbitrary server-side Python execution. Version 1.9.0 fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2026-33497 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-03-24 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to version 1.7.1, in the download_profile_picture function of the /profile_pictures/{folder_name}/{file_name} endpoint, the folder_name and file_name parameters are not strictly filtered, which allows the secret_key to be read across directories. Version 1.7.1 contains a patch. | |||||
| CVE-2026-33484 | 1 Langflow | 1 Langflow | 2026-03-24 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. In versions 1.0.0 through 1.8.1, the `/api/v1/files/images/{flow_id}/{file_name}` endpoint serves image files without any authentication or ownership check. Any unauthenticated request with a known flow_id and file_name returns the image with HTTP 200. In a multi-tenant deployment, any attacker who can discover or guess a `flow_id` (UUIDs can be leaked through other API responses) can download any user's uploaded images without credentials. Version 1.9.0 contains a patch. | |||||
