Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscribe
Total
6094 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-3596 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openstack Platform | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An information leak was found in OpenStack's undercloud. This flaw allows unauthenticated, remote attackers to inspect sensitive data after discovering the IP address of the undercloud, possibly leading to compromising private information, including administrator access credentials. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3560 | 3 Fedoraproject, Pesign Project, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Pesign, Enterprise Linux | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in pesign. The pesign package provides a systemd service used to start the pesign daemon. This service unit runs a script to set ACLs for /etc/pki/pesign and /run/pesign directories to grant access privileges to users in the 'pesign' group. However, the script doesn't check for symbolic links. This could allow an attacker to gain access to privileged files and directories via a path traversal attack. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3500 | 3 Fedoraproject, Keylime, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Keylime, Enterprise Linux | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.1 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in keylime. This security issue happens in some circumstances, due to some improperly handled exceptions, there exists the possibility that a rogue agent could create errors on the verifier that stopped attestation attempts for that host leaving it in an attested state but not verifying that anymore. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3466 | 2 Kubernetes, Redhat | 2 Cri-o, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| The version of cri-o as released for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.9.48, 4.10.31, and 4.11.6 via RHBA-2022:6316, RHBA-2022:6257, and RHBA-2022:6658, respectively, included an incorrect version of cri-o missing the fix for CVE-2022-27652, which was previously fixed in OCP 4.9.41 and 4.10.12 via RHBA-2022:5433 and RHSA-2022:1600. This issue could allow an attacker with access to programs with inheritable file capabilities to elevate those capabilities to the permitted set when execve(2) runs. For more details, see https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-27652. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3424 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 2 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A use-after-free flaw was found in the Linux kernel’s SGI GRU driver in the way the first gru_file_unlocked_ioctl function is called by the user, where a fail pass occurs in the gru_check_chiplet_assignment function. This flaw allows a local user to crash or potentially escalate their privileges on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3277 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 2 Neutron, Openstack Platform | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An uncontrolled resource consumption flaw was found in openstack-neutron. This flaw allows a remote authenticated user to query a list of security groups for an invalid project. This issue creates resources that are unconstrained by the user's quota. If a malicious user were to submit a significant number of requests, this could lead to a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3262 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in Openshift. A pod with a DNSPolicy of "ClusterFirst" may incorrectly resolve the hostname based on a service provided. This flaw allows an attacker to supply an incorrect name with the DNS search policy, affecting confidentiality and availability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3261 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openstack Platform | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in OpenStack. Multiple components show plain-text passwords in /var/log/messages during the OpenStack overcloud update run, leading to a disclosure of sensitive information problem. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3260 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| The response header has not enabled X-FRAME-OPTIONS, Which helps prevents against Clickjacking attack.. Some browsers would interpret these results incorrectly, allowing clickjacking attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3259 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| Openshift 4.9 does not use HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) which may allow man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3248 | 1 Redhat | 2 Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in OpenShift API, as admission checks do not enforce "custom-host" permissions. This issue could allow an attacker to violate the boundaries, as permissions will not be applied. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3205 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| Cross site scripting in automation controller UI in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 1.2 and 2.0 where the project name is susceptible to XSS injection | |||||
| CVE-2022-3146 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 3 Tripleo Ansible, Openstack, Openstack For Ibm Power | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in tripleo-ansible. Due to an insecure default configuration, the permissions of a sensitive file are not sufficiently restricted. This flaw allows a local attacker to use brute force to explore the relevant directory and discover the file. This issue leads to information disclosure of important configuration details from the OpenStack deployment. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3143 | 1 Redhat | 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Wildfly Elytron | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| wildfly-elytron: possible timing attacks via use of unsafe comparator. A flaw was found in Wildfly-elytron. Wildfly-elytron uses java.util.Arrays.equals in several places, which is unsafe and vulnerable to timing attacks. To compare values securely, use java.security.MessageDigest.isEqual instead. This flaw allows an attacker to access secure information or impersonate an authed user. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3101 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 3 Tripleo Ansible, Openstack, Openstack For Ibm Power | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in tripleo-ansible. Due to an insecure default configuration, the permissions of a sensitive file are not sufficiently restricted. This flaw allows a local attacker to use brute force to explore the relevant directory and discover the file, leading to information disclosure of important configuration details from the OpenStack deployment. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3100 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 5 Barbican, Enterprise Linux Eus, Openstack and 2 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in the openstack-barbican component. This issue allows an access policy bypass via a query string when accessing the API. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38065 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openstack | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the oslo.privsep functionality of OpenStack git master 05194e7618 and prior. Overly permissive functionality within tools leveraging this library within a container can lead increased privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36769 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Cloud Pak For Data, Openshift | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| IBM Cloud Pak for Data 4.5 and 4.6 could allow a privileged user to upload malicious files of dangerous types that can be automatically processed within the product's environment. IBM X-Force ID: 232034. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35653 | 3 Fedoraproject, Moodle, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Moodle, Enterprise Linux | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A reflected XSS issue was identified in the LTI module of Moodle. The vulnerability exists due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied data in the LTI module. A remote attacker can trick the victim to follow a specially crafted link and execute arbitrary HTML and script code in user's browser in context of vulnerable website to steal potentially sensitive information, change appearance of the web page, can perform phishing and drive-by-download attacks. This vulnerability does not impact authenticated users. | |||||
| CVE-2022-35651 | 3 Fedoraproject, Moodle, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Moodle, Enterprise Linux | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A stored XSS and blind SSRF vulnerability was found in Moodle, occurs due to insufficient sanitization of user-supplied data in the SCORM track details. A remote attacker can trick the victim to follow a specially crafted link and execute arbitrary HTML and script code in user's browser in context of vulnerable website to steal potentially sensitive information, change appearance of the web page, can perform phishing and drive-by-download attacks. | |||||