Filtered by vendor Google
Subscribe
Total
13155 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-32350 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In maybeShowDialog of ControlsSettingsDialogManager.kt, there is a possible overlay of the ControlsSettingsDialog due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48524 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In isSystem of WifiPermissionsUtil.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48560 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In AndroidManifest.xml, there is a possible way for an app to monitor motion events due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48563 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In onNullBinding of RemoteFillService.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48581 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In VerifyNoOverlapInSessions of apexd.cpp, there is a possible way to block security updates through mainline installations due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-40664 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| In setupAccessibilityServices of AccessibilityFragment.java , there is a possible way to hide an enabled accessibility service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-4600 | 1 Google | 1 Application Load Balancer | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A request smuggling vulnerability existed in the Google Cloud Classic Application Load Balancer due to improper handling of chunked-encoded HTTP requests. This allowed attackers to craft requests that could be misinterpreted by backend servers. The issue was fixed by disallowing stray data after a chunk, and is no longer exploitable. No action is required as Classic Application Load Balancer service after 2025-04-26 is not vulnerable. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2713 | 1 Google | 1 Gvisor | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Google gVisor's runsc component exhibited a local privilege escalation vulnerability due to incorrect handling of file access permissions, which allowed unprivileged users to access restricted files. This occurred because the process initially ran with root-like permissions until the first fork. | |||||
| CVE-2024-7254 | 2 Google, Netapp | 8 Protobuf, Protobuf-java, Protobuf-javalite and 5 more | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Any project that parses untrusted Protocol Buffers data containing an arbitrary number of nested groups / series of SGROUP tags can corrupted by exceeding the stack limit i.e. StackOverflow. Parsing nested groups as unknown fields with DiscardUnknownFieldsParser or Java Protobuf Lite parser, or against Protobuf map fields, creates unbounded recursions that can be abused by an attacker. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6284 | 1 Google | 1 Nftables | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| In https://github.com/google/nftables IP addresses were encoded in the wrong byte order, resulting in an nftables configuration which does not work as intended (might block or not block the desired addresses). This issue affects: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/google/nftables@v0.1.0 The bug was fixed in the next released version: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/google/nftables@v0.2.0 | |||||
| CVE-2024-5899 | 1 Google | 3 Bazel For Android Studio, Bazel For Clion, Bazel For Intellij | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 3.3 LOW |
| When Bazel Plugin in intellij imports a project (either using "import project" or "Auto import") the dialog for trusting the project is not displayed. This comes from the fact that both call the method ProjectBuilder.createProject which then calls ProjectManager.getInstance().createProject. This method, as its name suggests is intended to create a new project, not to import an existing one. We recommend upgrading to version 2024.06.04.0.2 or beyond for the IntelliJ, CLion and Android Studio Bazel plugins. | |||||
| CVE-2025-3067 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Inappropriate implementation in Custom Tabs in Google Chrome on Android prior to 135.0.7049.52 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform privilege escalation via a crafted app. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2025-26442 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-05 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In onCreate of NotificationAccessConfirmationActivity.java, there is a possible incorrect verification of proper intent filters in NLS due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26436 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-05 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In clearAllowBgActivityStarts of PendingIntentRecord.java, there is a possible way for an application to launch an activity from the background due to BAL Bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26435 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-05 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26430 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-05 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In getDestinationForApp of SpaAppBridgeActivity, there is a possible cross-user file reveal due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48526 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-05 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| In createMultiProfilePagerAdapter of ChooserActivity.java , there is a possible way for an app to launch the ChooserActivity in another profile due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48523 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-05 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In onCreate of SelectAccountActivity.java, there is a possible way to add contacts without permission due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-22441 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-05 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| In getContextForResourcesEnsuringCorrectCachedApkPaths of RemoteViews.java, there is a possible way to load arbitrary java code in a privileged context due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-0076 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-05 | N/A | 3.3 LOW |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to view icons belonging to another user due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||