Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Filtered by vendor Siemens Subscribe
Total 2132 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v2 CVSS v3
CVE-2022-29882 1 Siemens 72 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0, 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0 Firmware, 7kg8500-0aa00-2aa0 and 69 more 2025-12-09 4.3 MEDIUM 7.1 HIGH
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices do not handle uploaded files correctly. An unauthenticated attacker could take advantage of this situation to store an XSS attack, which could - when a legitimate user accesses the error logs - perform arbitrary actions in the name of the user.
CVE-2022-29881 1 Siemens 72 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0, 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0 Firmware, 7kg8500-0aa00-2aa0 and 69 more 2025-12-09 5.0 MEDIUM 5.3 MEDIUM
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). The web based management interface of affected devices does not employ special access protection for certain internal developer views. This could allow unauthenticated users to extract internal configuration details.
CVE-2022-29880 1 Siemens 72 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0, 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0 Firmware, 7kg8500-0aa00-2aa0 and 69 more 2025-12-09 3.5 LOW 6.5 MEDIUM
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices do not properly validate input in the configuration interface. This could allow an authenticated attacker to place persistent XSS attacks to perform arbitrary actions in the name of a logged user which accesses the affected views.
CVE-2022-29879 1 Siemens 72 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0, 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0 Firmware, 7kg8500-0aa00-2aa0 and 69 more 2025-12-09 4.0 MEDIUM 4.3 MEDIUM
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). The web based management interface of affected devices does not employ special access protection for certain internal developer views. This could allow authenticated users to access critical device information.
CVE-2022-29878 1 Siemens 72 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0, 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0 Firmware, 7kg8500-0aa00-2aa0 and 69 more 2025-12-09 6.8 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices use a limited range for challenges that are sent during the unencrypted challenge-response communication. An unauthenticated attacker could capture a valid challenge-response pair generated by a legitimate user, and request the webpage repeatedly to wait for the same challenge to reappear for which the correct response is known. This could allow the attacker to access the management interface of the device.
CVE-2022-29876 1 Siemens 72 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0, 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0 Firmware, 7kg8500-0aa00-2aa0 and 69 more 2025-12-09 4.3 MEDIUM 7.1 HIGH
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices do not properly handle the input of a GET request parameter. The provided argument is directly reflected in the web server response. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to perform reflected XSS attacks.
CVE-2022-29874 1 Siemens 72 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0, 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0 Firmware, 7kg8500-0aa00-2aa0 and 69 more 2025-12-09 5.0 MEDIUM 8.8 HIGH
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices do not encrypt web traffic with clients but communicate in cleartext via HTTP. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to capture the traffic and interfere with the functionality of the device.
CVE-2022-29873 1 Siemens 72 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0, 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0 Firmware, 7kg8500-0aa00-2aa0 and 69 more 2025-12-09 7.5 HIGH 9.8 CRITICAL
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices do not properly validate parameters of certain GET and POST requests. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to set the device to a denial of service state or to control the program counter and, thus, execute arbitrary code on the device.
CVE-2022-29872 1 Siemens 72 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0, 7kg8500-0aa00-0aa0 Firmware, 7kg8500-0aa00-2aa0 and 69 more 2025-12-09 6.5 MEDIUM 8.8 HIGH
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices do not properly validate parameters of POST requests. This could allow an authenticated attacker to set the device to a denial of service state or to control the program counter and, thus, execute arbitrary code on the device.
CVE-2020-27827 5 Fedoraproject, Lldpd Project, Openvswitch and 2 more 27 Fedora, Lldpd, Openvswitch and 24 more 2025-12-03 7.1 HIGH 7.5 HIGH
A flaw was found in multiple versions of OpenvSwitch. Specially crafted LLDP packets can cause memory to be lost when allocating data to handle specific optional TLVs, potentially causing a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.
CVE-2019-19956 7 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more 12 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 9 more 2025-12-03 5.0 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
xmlParseBalancedChunkMemoryRecover in parser.c in libxml2 before 2.9.10 has a memory leak related to newDoc->oldNs.
CVE-2020-7595 7 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more 32 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 29 more 2025-12-03 5.0 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
xmlStringLenDecodeEntities in parser.c in libxml2 2.9.10 has an infinite loop in a certain end-of-file situation.
CVE-2022-34464 1 Siemens 4 Sicam Gridedge Essential Arm, Sicam Gridedge Essential Gds Arm, Sicam Gridedge Essential Gds Intel and 1 more 2025-11-12 2.1 LOW 6.3 MEDIUM
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM GridEdge (Classic) (All versions < V2.7.3). The affected application uses an improperly protected file to import SSH keys. This could allow attackers with access to the filesystem of the host on which SICAM GridEdge runs to inject a custom SSH key to that file.
CVE-2022-30231 1 Siemens 1 Sicam Gridedge Essential 2025-11-12 4.0 MEDIUM 4.9 MEDIUM
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM GridEdge (Classic) (All versions < V2.6.6). The affected application discloses password hashes of other users upon request. This could allow an authenticated user to retrieve another user's password hash.
CVE-2022-30230 1 Siemens 1 Sicam Gridedge Essential 2025-11-12 7.5 HIGH 9.8 CRITICAL
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM GridEdge (Classic) (All versions < V2.6.6). The affected application does not require authenticated access for privileged functions. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to create a new user with administrative permissions.
CVE-2022-30229 1 Siemens 1 Sicam Gridedge Essential 2025-11-12 5.0 MEDIUM 7.2 HIGH
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM GridEdge (Classic) (All versions < V2.6.6). The affected application does not require authenticated access for privileged functions. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to change data of a user, such as credentials, in case that user's id is known.
CVE-2022-30228 1 Siemens 1 Sicam Gridedge Essential 2025-11-12 4.3 MEDIUM 8.8 HIGH
A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM GridEdge (Classic) (All versions < V2.6.6). The affected software does not apply cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) restrictions for critical operations. In case an attacker tricks a legitimate user into accessing a special resource a malicious request could be executed.
CVE-2023-28766 1 Siemens 78 Siprotec 5 6md85, Siprotec 5 6md85 Firmware, Siprotec 5 6md86 and 75 more 2025-11-11 N/A 7.5 HIGH
A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.1) (All versions < V9.40 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.1) (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 1) (All versions < V9.40 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 1) (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO (All versions < V9.40), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V9.40). Affected devices lack proper validation of http request parameters of the hosted web service. An unauthenticated remote attacker could send specially crafted packets that could cause denial of service condition of the target device.
CVE-2022-45044 1 Siemens 68 Siprotec 5 6md85, Siprotec 5 6md85 Firmware, Siprotec 5 6md86 and 65 more 2025-11-11 N/A 5.3 MEDIUM
A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SA84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SD84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.1) (All versions installed on CP200 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.1) (All versions < V9.50 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.1) (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 1) (All versions installed on CP200 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 1) (All versions < V9.50 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 1) (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V9.50). Affected devices do not properly restrict secure client-initiated renegotiations within the SSL and TLS protocols. This could allow an attacker to create a denial of service condition on the ports 443/tcp and 4443/tcp for the duration of the attack.
CVE-2022-0847 7 Fedoraproject, Linux, Netapp and 4 more 39 Fedora, Linux Kernel, H300e and 36 more 2025-11-06 7.2 HIGH 7.8 HIGH
A flaw was found in the way the "flags" member of the new pipe buffer structure was lacking proper initialization in copy_page_to_iter_pipe and push_pipe functions in the Linux kernel and could thus contain stale values. An unprivileged local user could use this flaw to write to pages in the page cache backed by read only files and as such escalate their privileges on the system.