Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscribe
Filtered by product Jboss Enterprise Application Platform
Subscribe
Total
243 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2013-0218 | 1 Redhat | 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Web Platform | 2026-04-29 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| The GUI installer in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) and Enterprise Web Platform (EWP) 5.2.0 and possibly 5.1.2 uses world-readable permissions for the auto-install XML file, which allows local users to obtain the administrator password and the sucker password by reading this file. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1484 | 1 Redhat | 3 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Soa Platform, Jboss Seam 2 Framework | 2026-04-29 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| jboss-seam.jar in the JBoss Seam 2 framework 2.2.x and earlier, as distributed in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4.3.0.CP04 and 5.1.0 and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.3.0.CP09 and 5.1.0, does not properly restrict use of Expression Language (EL) statements in FacesMessages during page exception handling, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java code via a crafted URL to an application. | |||||
| CVE-2009-0027 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2026-04-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The request handler in JBossWS in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP06 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP04 does not properly validate the resource path during a request for a WSDL file with a custom web-service endpoint, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary XML files via a crafted request. | |||||
| CVE-2008-3519 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2026-04-23 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The default configuration of the JBossAs component in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBossEAP or EAP), possibly 4.2 before CP04 and 4.3 before CP02, when a production environment is enabled, sets the DownloadServerClasses property to true, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information (non-EJB classes) via a download request, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-3273. | |||||
| CVE-2008-0455 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 6 Http Server, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 3 more | 2026-04-23 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the mod_negotiation module in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.6 and earlier in the 2.2.x series, 2.0.61 and earlier in the 2.0.x series, and 1.3.39 and earlier in the 1.3.x series allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML by uploading a file with a name containing XSS sequences and a file extension, which leads to injection within a (1) "406 Not Acceptable" or (2) "300 Multiple Choices" HTTP response when the extension is omitted in a request for the file. | |||||
| CVE-2009-2405 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2026-04-23 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Web Console in the Application Server in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2.0 before 4.2.0.CP08, 4.2.2GA, 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP07, and 5.1.0GA allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) monitorName, (2) objectName, (3) attribute, or (4) period parameter to createSnapshot.jsp, or the (5) monitorName, (6) objectName, (7) attribute, (8) threshold, (9) period, or (10) enabled parameter to createThresholdMonitor.jsp. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. | |||||
| CVE-2009-1380 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2026-04-23 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in JMX-Console in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP08 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP07 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the filter parameter, related to the key property and the position of quote and colon characters. | |||||
| CVE-2009-3554 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2026-04-23 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| Twiddle in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP08 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP07 writes the JMX password, and other command-line arguments, to the twiddle.log file, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading this file. | |||||
| CVE-2010-1428 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2026-04-22 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The Web Console (aka web-console) in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP08 performs access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via an unspecified request that uses a different method. | |||||
| CVE-2010-0738 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2026-04-22 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The JMX-Console web application in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP08 performs access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allows remote attackers to send requests to this application's GET handler by using a different method. | |||||
| CVE-2010-1871 | 2 Netapp, Redhat | 5 Oncommand Balance, Oncommand Insight, Oncommand Unified Manager and 2 more | 2026-04-22 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| JBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, does not properly sanitize inputs for JBoss Expression Language (EL) expressions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when the Java Security Manager is not properly configured. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12149 | 1 Redhat | 1 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2026-04-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Jboss Application Server as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Application Platform 5.2, it was found that the doFilter method in the ReadOnlyAccessFilter of the HTTP Invoker does not restrict classes for which it performs deserialization and thus allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code via crafted serialized data. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12617 | 6 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 3 more | 58 Tomcat, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 55 more | 2026-04-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| When running Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0, 8.5.0 to 8.5.22, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.46 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.81 with HTTP PUTs enabled (e.g. via setting the readonly initialisation parameter of the Default servlet to false) it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server via a specially crafted request. This JSP could then be requested and any code it contained would be executed by the server. | |||||
| CVE-2026-28367 | 1 Redhat | 9 Build Of Apache Camel - Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel For Spring Boot, Data Grid and 6 more | 2026-04-10 | N/A | 8.7 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in Undertow. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending `\r\r\r` as a header block terminator. This can be used for request smuggling with certain proxy servers, such as older versions of Apache Traffic Server and Google Cloud Classic Application Load Balancer, potentially leading to unauthorized access or manipulation of web requests. | |||||
| CVE-2026-3260 | 1 Redhat | 10 Build Of Apache Camel - Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel For Spring Boot, Data Grid and 7 more | 2026-04-08 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in Undertow. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending an HTTP GET request containing multipart/form-data content. If the underlying application processes parameters using methods like `getParameterMap()`, the server prematurely parses and stores this content to disk. This could lead to resource exhaustion, potentially resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). | |||||
| CVE-2026-3121 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack and 1 more | 2026-04-02 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An administrator with `manage-clients` permission can exploit a misconfiguration where this permission is equivalent to `manage-permissions`. This allows the administrator to escalate privileges and gain control over roles, users, or other administrative functions within the realm. This privilege escalation can occur when admin permissions are enabled at the realm level. | |||||
| CVE-2026-4366 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack and 1 more | 2026-04-01 | N/A | 5.8 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was identified in Keycloak, an identity and access management solution, where it improperly follows HTTP redirects when processing certain client configuration requests. This behavior allows an attacker to trick the server into making unintended requests to internal or restricted resources. As a result, sensitive internal services such as cloud metadata endpoints could be accessed. This issue may lead to information disclosure and enable attackers to map internal network infrastructure. | |||||
| CVE-2026-4874 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack and 1 more | 2026-04-01 | N/A | 3.1 LOW |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated attacker can perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) by manipulating the `client_session_host` parameter during refresh token requests. This occurs when a Keycloak client is configured to use the `backchannel.logout.url` with the `application.session.host` placeholder. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to make HTTP requests from the Keycloak server’s network context, potentially probing internal networks or internal APIs, leading to information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2026-28368 | 1 Redhat | 10 Build Of Apache Camel - Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel For Spring Boot, Data Grid and 7 more | 2026-03-31 | N/A | 8.7 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in Undertow. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to construct specially crafted requests where header names are parsed differently by Undertow compared to upstream proxies. This discrepancy in header interpretation can be exploited to launch request smuggling attacks, potentially bypassing security controls and accessing unauthorized resources. | |||||
| CVE-2026-28369 | 1 Redhat | 10 Build Of Apache Camel - Hawtio, Build Of Apache Camel For Spring Boot, Data Grid and 7 more | 2026-03-31 | N/A | 8.7 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in Undertow. When Undertow receives an HTTP request where the first header line starts with one or more spaces, it incorrectly processes the request by stripping these leading spaces. This behavior, which violates HTTP standards, can be exploited by a remote attacker to perform request smuggling. Request smuggling allows an attacker to bypass security mechanisms, access restricted information, or manipulate web caches, potentially leading to unauthorized actions or data exposure. | |||||