Total
184 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-2829 | 2 Isc, Netapp | 12 Bind, Active Iq Unified Manager, H300s and 9 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A `named` instance configured to run as a DNSSEC-validating recursive resolver with the Aggressive Use of DNSSEC-Validated Cache (RFC 8198) option (`synth-from-dnssec`) enabled can be remotely terminated using a zone with a malformed NSEC record. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.8-S1 through 9.16.41-S1 and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.15-S1. | |||||
| CVE-2023-2828 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Isc and 1 more | 14 Debian Linux, Fedora, Bind and 11 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Every `named` instance configured to run as a recursive resolver maintains a cache database holding the responses to the queries it has recently sent to authoritative servers. The size limit for that cache database can be configured using the `max-cache-size` statement in the configuration file; it defaults to 90% of the total amount of memory available on the host. When the size of the cache reaches 7/8 of the configured limit, a cache-cleaning algorithm starts to remove expired and/or least-recently used RRsets from the cache, to keep memory use below the configured limit. It has been discovered that the effectiveness of the cache-cleaning algorithm used in `named` can be severely diminished by querying the resolver for specific RRsets in a certain order, effectively allowing the configured `max-cache-size` limit to be significantly exceeded. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.16.41, 9.18.0 through 9.18.15, 9.19.0 through 9.19.13, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.16.41-S1, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.15-S1. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3924 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| This issue can affect BIND 9 resolvers with `stale-answer-enable yes;` that also make use of the option `stale-answer-client-timeout`, configured with a value greater than zero. If the resolver receives many queries that require recursion, there will be a corresponding increase in the number of clients that are waiting for recursion to complete. If there are sufficient clients already waiting when a new client query is received so that it is necessary to SERVFAIL the longest waiting client (see BIND 9 ARM `recursive-clients` limit and soft quota), then it is possible for a race to occur between providing a stale answer to this older client and sending an early timeout SERVFAIL, which may cause an assertion failure. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.12 through 9.16.36, 9.18.0 through 9.18.10, 9.19.0 through 9.19.8, and 9.16.12-S1 through 9.16.36-S1. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3736 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| BIND 9 resolver can crash when stale cache and stale answers are enabled, option `stale-answer-client-timeout` is set to a positive integer, and the resolver receives an RRSIG query. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.12 through 9.16.36, 9.18.0 through 9.18.10, 9.19.0 through 9.19.8, and 9.16.12-S1 through 9.16.36-S1. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3488 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Processing of repeated responses to the same query, where both responses contain ECS pseudo-options, but where the first is broken in some way, can cause BIND to exit with an assertion failure. 'Broken' in this context is anything that would cause the resolver to reject the query response, such as a mismatch between query and answer name. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.4-S1 through 9.11.37-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 through 9.16.36-S1. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3094 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Sending a flood of dynamic DNS updates may cause `named` to allocate large amounts of memory. This, in turn, may cause `named` to exit due to a lack of free memory. We are not aware of any cases where this has been exploited. Memory is allocated prior to the checking of access permissions (ACLs) and is retained during the processing of a dynamic update from a client whose access credentials are accepted. Memory allocated to clients that are not permitted to send updates is released immediately upon rejection. The scope of this vulnerability is limited therefore to trusted clients who are permitted to make dynamic zone changes. If a dynamic update is REFUSED, memory will be released again very quickly. Therefore it is only likely to be possible to degrade or stop `named` by sending a flood of unaccepted dynamic updates comparable in magnitude to a query flood intended to achieve the same detrimental outcome. BIND 9.11 and earlier branches are also affected, but through exhaustion of internal resources rather than memory constraints. This may reduce performance but should not be a significant problem for most servers. Therefore we don't intend to address this for BIND versions prior to BIND 9.16. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.0 through 9.16.36, 9.18.0 through 9.18.10, 9.19.0 through 9.19.8, and 9.16.8-S1 through 9.16.36-S1. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3080 | 2 Fedoraproject, Isc | 2 Fedora, Bind | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| By sending specific queries to the resolver, an attacker can cause named to crash. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38178 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Isc and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Fedora, Bind and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| By spoofing the target resolver with responses that have a malformed EdDSA signature, an attacker can trigger a small memory leak. It is possible to gradually erode available memory to the point where named crashes for lack of resources. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38177 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Isc and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Fedora, Bind and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| By spoofing the target resolver with responses that have a malformed ECDSA signature, an attacker can trigger a small memory leak. It is possible to gradually erode available memory to the point where named crashes for lack of resources. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2906 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An attacker can leverage this flaw to gradually erode available memory to the point where named crashes for lack of resources. Upon restart the attacker would have to begin again, but nevertheless there is the potential to deny service. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2881 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| The underlying bug might cause read past end of the buffer and either read memory it should not read, or crash the process. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2795 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Isc | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Bind | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| By flooding the target resolver with queries exploiting this flaw an attacker can significantly impair the resolver's performance, effectively denying legitimate clients access to the DNS resolution service. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1183 | 2 Isc, Netapp | 11 Bind, H300s, H300s Firmware and 8 more | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| On vulnerable configurations, the named daemon may, in some circumstances, terminate with an assertion failure. Vulnerable configurations are those that include a reference to http within the listen-on statements in their named.conf. TLS is used by both DNS over TLS (DoT) and DNS over HTTPS (DoH), but configurations using DoT alone are unaffected. Affects BIND 9.18.0 -> 9.18.2 and version 9.19.0 of the BIND 9.19 development branch. | |||||
| CVE-2022-0667 | 2 Isc, Netapp | 17 Bind, H300e, H300e Firmware and 14 more | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| When the vulnerability is triggered the BIND process will exit. BIND 9.18.0 | |||||
| CVE-2022-0635 | 2 Isc, Netapp | 17 Bind, H300e, H300e Firmware and 14 more | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Versions affected: BIND 9.18.0 When a vulnerable version of named receives a series of specific queries, the named process will eventually terminate due to a failed assertion check. | |||||
| CVE-2022-0396 | 4 Fedoraproject, Isc, Netapp and 1 more | 19 Fedora, Bind, H300e and 16 more | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| BIND 9.16.11 -> 9.16.26, 9.17.0 -> 9.18.0 and versions 9.16.11-S1 -> 9.16.26-S1 of the BIND Supported Preview Edition. Specifically crafted TCP streams can cause connections to BIND to remain in CLOSE_WAIT status for an indefinite period of time, even after the client has terminated the connection. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25220 | 5 Fedoraproject, Isc, Juniper and 2 more | 48 Fedora, Bind, Junos and 45 more | 2026-06-17 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| BIND 9.11.0 -> 9.11.36 9.12.0 -> 9.16.26 9.17.0 -> 9.18.0 BIND Supported Preview Editions: 9.11.4-S1 -> 9.11.36-S1 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.26-S1 Versions of BIND 9 earlier than those shown - back to 9.1.0, including Supported Preview Editions - are also believed to be affected but have not been tested as they are EOL. The cache could become poisoned with incorrect records leading to queries being made to the wrong servers, which might also result in false information being returned to clients. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25219 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Isc and 3 more | 23 Debian Linux, Fedora, Bind and 20 more | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In BIND 9.3.0 -> 9.11.35, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.21, and versions 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.35-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.21-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.18 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, exploitation of broken authoritative servers using a flaw in response processing can cause degradation in BIND resolver performance. The way the lame cache is currently designed makes it possible for its internal data structures to grow almost infinitely, which may cause significant delays in client query processing. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25218 | 2 Fedoraproject, Isc | 2 Fedora, Bind | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In BIND 9.16.19, 9.17.16. Also, version 9.16.19-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition When a vulnerable version of named receives a query under the circumstances described above, the named process will terminate due to a failed assertion check. The vulnerability affects only BIND 9 releases 9.16.19, 9.17.16, and release 9.16.19-S1 of the BIND Supported Preview Edition. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25216 | 4 Debian, Isc, Netapp and 1 more | 23 Debian Linux, Bind, Active Iq Unified Manager and 20 more | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security. | |||||