Total
4662 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-23390 | 1 Totaljs | 1 Total4 | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The package total4 before 0.0.43 are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Execution via the U.set() and U.get() functions. | |||||
| CVE-2021-23389 | 1 Totaljs | 1 Total.js | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The package total.js before 3.4.9 are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Execution via the U.set() and U.get() functions. | |||||
| CVE-2021-23358 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Tenable and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Fedora, Tenable.sc and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 3.3 LOW |
| The package underscore from 1.13.0-0 and before 1.13.0-2, from 1.3.2 and before 1.12.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Injection via the template function, particularly when a variable property is passed as an argument as it is not sanitized. | |||||
| CVE-2021-23344 | 1 Totaljs | 1 Total.js | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The package total.js before 3.4.8 are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) via set. | |||||
| CVE-2021-23337 | 4 Lodash, Netapp, Oracle and 1 more | 23 Lodash, Active Iq Unified Manager, Cloud Manager and 20 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| Lodash versions prior to 4.17.21 are vulnerable to Command Injection via the template function. | |||||
| CVE-2021-23281 | 1 Eaton | 1 Intelligent Power Manager | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| Eaton Intelligent Power Manager (IPM) prior to 1.69 is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability. IPM software does not sanitize the date provided via coverterCheckList action in meta_driver_srv.js class. Attackers can send a specially crafted packet to make IPM connect to rouge SNMP server and execute attacker-controlled code. | |||||
| CVE-2021-23277 | 1 Eaton | 3 Intelligent Power Manager, Intelligent Power Manager Virtual Appliance, Intelligent Power Protector | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 8.3 HIGH |
| Eaton Intelligent Power Manager (IPM) prior to 1.69 is vulnerable to unauthenticated eval injection vulnerability. The software does not neutralize code syntax from users before using in the dynamic evaluation call in loadUserFile function under scripts/libs/utils.js. Successful exploitation can allow attackers to control the input to the function and execute attacker controlled commands. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22961 | 1 Glasswire | 1 Glasswire | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A code injection vulnerability exists within the firewall software of GlassWire v2.1.167 that could lead to arbitrary code execution from a file in the user path on first execution. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22395 | 1 Huawei | 3 Emui, Harmonyos, Magic Ui | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| There is a code injection vulnerability in smartphones. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22336 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Magic Ui | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| There is an Improper Control of Generation of Code vulnerability in Huawei Smartphone. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause denial of security services on a rooted device. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22282 | 1 Br-automation | 1 Automation Studio | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.3 HIGH |
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in B&R Industrial Automation Automation Studio allows Local Execution of Code.This issue affects Automation Studio: from 4.0 through 4.12. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22150 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| It was discovered that a user with Fleet admin permissions could upload a malicious package. Due to using an older version of the js-yaml library, this package would be loaded in an insecure manner, allowing an attacker to execute commands on the Kibana server. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22053 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Cloud Netflix | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Applications using both `spring-cloud-netflix-hystrix-dashboard` and `spring-boot-starter-thymeleaf` expose a way to execute code submitted within the request URI path during the resolution of view templates. When a request is made at `/hystrix/monitor;[user-provided data]`, the path elements following `hystrix/monitor` are being evaluated as SpringEL expressions, which can lead to code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21477 | 1 Sap | 1 Commerce | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 HIGH | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| SAP Commerce Cloud, versions - 1808,1811,1905,2005,2011, enables certain users with required privileges to edit drools rules, an authenticated attacker with this privilege will be able to inject malicious code in the drools rules which when executed leads to Remote Code Execution vulnerability enabling the attacker to compromise the underlying host enabling him to impair confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21466 | 1 Sap | 2 Business Warehouse, Bw\/4hana | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| SAP Business Warehouse, versions 700, 701, 702, 711, 730, 731, 740, 750, 782 and SAP BW/4HANA, versions 100, 200, allow a low privileged attacker to inject code using a remote enabled function module over the network. Via the function module an attacker can create a malicious ABAP report which could be used to get access to sensitive data, to inject malicious UPDATE statements that could have also impact on the operating system, to disrupt the functionality of the SAP system which can thereby lead to a Denial of Service. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21305 | 1 Carrierwave Project | 1 Carrierwave | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 7.4 HIGH |
| CarrierWave is an open-source RubyGem which provides a simple and flexible way to upload files from Ruby applications. In CarrierWave before versions 1.3.2 and 2.1.1, there is a code injection vulnerability. The "#manipulate!" method inappropriately evals the content of mutation option(:read/:write), allowing attackers to craft a string that can be executed as a Ruby code. If an application developer supplies untrusted inputs to the option, it will lead to remote code execution(RCE). This is fixed in versions 1.3.2 and 2.1.1. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21277 | 1 Peerigon | 1 Angular-expressions | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.5 HIGH |
| angular-expressions is "angular's nicest part extracted as a standalone module for the browser and node". In angular-expressions before version 1.1.2 there is a vulnerability which allows Remote Code Execution if you call "expressions.compile(userControlledInput)" where "userControlledInput" is text that comes from user input. The security of the package could be bypassed by using a more complex payload, using a ".constructor.constructor" technique. In terms of impact: If running angular-expressions in the browser, an attacker could run any browser script when the application code calls expressions.compile(userControlledInput). If running angular-expressions on the server, an attacker could run any Javascript expression, thus gaining Remote Code Execution. This is fixed in version 1.1.2 of angular-expressions A temporary workaround might be either to disable user-controlled input that will be fed into angular-expressions in your application or allow only following characters in the userControlledInput. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21248 | 1 Onedev Project | 1 Onedev | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, there is a critical vulnerability involving the build endpoint parameters. InputSpec is used to define parameters of a Build spec. It does so by using dynamically generated Groovy classes. A user able to control job parameters can run arbitrary code on OneDev's server by injecting arbitrary Groovy code. The ultimate result is in the injection of a static constructor that will run arbitrary code. For a full example refer to the referenced GHSA. This issue was addressed in 4.0.3 by escaping special characters such as quote from user input. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21244 | 1 Onedev Project | 1 Onedev | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, There is a vulnerability that enabled pre-auth server side template injection via Bean validation message tampering. Full details in the reference GHSA. This issue was fixed in 4.0.3 by disabling validation interpolation completely. | |||||
| CVE-2021-1585 | 1 Cisco | 1 Adaptive Security Device Manager | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Adaptive Security Device Manager (ASDM) Launcher could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on a user's operating system. This vulnerability is due to a lack of proper signature verification for specific code exchanged between the ASDM and the Launcher. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by leveraging a man-in-the-middle position on the network to intercept the traffic between the Launcher and the ASDM and then inject arbitrary code. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the user's operating system with the level of privileges assigned to the ASDM Launcher. A successful exploit may require the attacker to perform a social engineering attack to persuade the user to initiate communication from the Launcher to the ASDM. | |||||