Total
714 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-13329 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 Reader, Windows | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 9.5. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of TIF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-8695. | |||||
| CVE-2019-13118 | 7 Apple, Canonical, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 25 Icloud, Iphone Os, Itunes and 22 more | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In numbers.c in libxslt 1.1.33, a type holding grouping characters of an xsl:number instruction was too narrow and an invalid character/length combination could be passed to xsltNumberFormatDecimal, leading to a read of uninitialized stack data. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11750 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Firefox Esr | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A type confusion vulnerability exists in Spidermonkey, which results in a non-exploitable crash. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 69 and Firefox ESR < 68.1. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11707 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Thunderbird | 2026-06-17 | 7.5 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A type confusion vulnerability can occur when manipulating JavaScript objects due to issues in Array.pop. This can allow for an exploitable crash. We are aware of targeted attacks in the wild abusing this flaw. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 60.7.1, Firefox < 67.0.3, and Thunderbird < 60.7.2. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11706 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Thunderbird | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw in Thunderbird's implementation of iCal causes a type confusion in icaltimezone_get_vtimezone_properties when processing certain email messages, resulting in a crash. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 60.7.1. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10980 | 1 Laquisscada | 1 Scada | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A type confusion vulnerability may be exploited when LAquis SCADA 4.3.1.71 processes a specially crafted project file. This may allow an attacker to execute remote code. The attacker must have local access to the system. A CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 has been calculated; the CVSS vector string is (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | |||||
| CVE-2019-10231 | 1 Teclib-edition | 1 Gestionnaire Libre De Parc Informatique | 2026-06-17 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Teclib GLPI before 9.4.1.1 is affected by a PHP type juggling vulnerability allowing bypass of authentication. This occurs in Auth::checkPassword() (inc/auth.class.php). | |||||
| CVE-2019-0988 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2026-06-17 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a specially crafted website designed to exploit the vulnerability through a Microsoft browser and then convince a user to view the website. An attacker could also embed an ActiveX control marked "safe for initialization" in an application or Microsoft Office document that hosts the browser rendering engine. The attacker could also take advantage of compromised websites and websites that accept or host user-provided content or advertisements. These websites could contain specially crafted content that could exploit the vulnerability. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how the scripting engine handles objects in memory. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0920 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2026-06-17 | 7.6 HIGH | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a specially crafted website designed to exploit the vulnerability through a Microsoft browser and then convince a user to view the website. An attacker could also embed an ActiveX control marked "safe for initialization" in an application or Microsoft Office document that hosts the browser rendering engine. The attacker could also take advantage of compromised websites and websites that accept or host user-provided content or advertisements. These websites could contain specially crafted content that could exploit the vulnerability. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how the scripting engine handles objects in memory. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0810 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 and 7 more | 2026-06-17 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0806, CVE-2019-0812, CVE-2019-0829, CVE-2019-0860, CVE-2019-0861. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0752 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Internet Explorer, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 11 more | 2026-06-17 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0739, CVE-2019-0753, CVE-2019-0862. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9471 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In the deserialization constructor of NanoAppFilter.java, there is a possible loss of data due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the system server with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2018-9339 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In writeTypedArrayList and readTypedArrayList of Parcel.java, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8384 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Chakracore | 2026-06-17 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8266, CVE-2018-8380, CVE-2018-8381. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8298 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Chakracore | 2026-06-17 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the ChakraCore scripting engine handles objects in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8242, CVE-2018-8283, CVE-2018-8287, CVE-2018-8288, CVE-2018-8291, CVE-2018-8296. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8291 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Chakracore, Edge, Internet Explorer and 7 more | 2026-06-17 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft browsers, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects ChakraCore, Internet Explorer 11, Microsoft Edge. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8242, CVE-2018-8283, CVE-2018-8287, CVE-2018-8288, CVE-2018-8296, CVE-2018-8298. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8279 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 | 2026-06-17 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Microsoft Edge improperly accesses objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Edge Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8125, CVE-2018-8262, CVE-2018-8274, CVE-2018-8275, CVE-2018-8301. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8229 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-8227. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8133 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Chakracore, Edge | 2026-06-17 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0943, CVE-2018-8130, CVE-2018-8145, CVE-2018-8177. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6122 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Type confusion in WebAssembly in Google Chrome prior to 66.0.3359.139 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. | |||||