Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Filtered by CWE-674
Total 410 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v2 CVSS v3
CVE-2017-9766 2 Debian, Wireshark 2 Debian Linux, Wireshark 2026-05-13 5.0 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
In Wireshark 2.2.7, PROFINET IO data with a high recursion depth allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack exhaustion) in the dissect_IODWriteReq function in plugins/profinet/packet-dcerpc-pn-io.c.
CVE-2017-12964 1 Libsass 1 Libsass 2026-05-13 7.8 HIGH 7.5 HIGH
There is a stack consumption issue in LibSass 3.4.5 that is triggered in the function Sass::Eval::operator() in eval.cpp. It will lead to a remote denial of service attack.
CVE-2017-9617 1 Wireshark 1 Wireshark 2026-05-13 4.3 MEDIUM 5.5 MEDIUM
In Wireshark 2.2.7, deeply nested DAAP data may cause stack exhaustion (uncontrolled recursion) in the dissect_daap_one_tag function in epan/dissectors/packet-daap.c in the DAAP dissector.
CVE-2017-11556 1 Libsass 1 Libsass 2026-05-13 5.0 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
There is a stack consumption vulnerability in the Parser::advanceToNextToken function in parser.cpp in LibSass 3.4.5. A crafted input may lead to remote denial of service.
CVE-2017-11164 1 Pcre 1 Pcre 2026-05-13 7.8 HIGH 7.5 HIGH
In PCRE 8.41, the OP_KETRMAX feature in the match function in pcre_exec.c allows stack exhaustion (uncontrolled recursion) when processing a crafted regular expression.
CVE-2017-8535 1 Microsoft 13 Endpoint Protection, Exchange Server, Forefront Endpoint Protection and 10 more 2026-05-13 4.3 MEDIUM 5.5 MEDIUM
The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to denial of service. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Denial of Service Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8536, CVE-2017-8537, CVE-2017-8539, and CVE-2017-8542.
CVE-2017-7515 1 Freedesktop 1 Poppler 2026-05-13 4.3 MEDIUM 5.5 MEDIUM
poppler through version 0.55.0 is vulnerable to an uncontrolled recursion in pdfunite resulting into potential denial-of-service.
CVE-2017-9304 1 Virustotal 1 Yara 2026-05-13 5.0 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
libyara/re.c in the regexp module in YARA 3.5.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack consumption) via a crafted rule that is mishandled in the _yr_re_emit function.
CVE-2017-9438 1 Virustotal 1 Yara 2026-05-13 5.0 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
libyara/re.c in the regexp module in YARA 3.5.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack consumption) via a crafted rule (involving hex strings) that is mishandled in the _yr_re_emit function, a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-9304.
CVE-2017-0692 1 Google 1 Android 2026-05-13 4.3 MEDIUM 5.5 MEDIUM
A denial of service vulnerability in the Android media framework. Product: Android. Versions: 4.4.4, 5.0.2, 5.1.1, 6.0, 6.0.1, 7.0, 7.1.1, 7.1.2. Android ID: A-36725407.
CVE-2017-11554 1 Libsass 1 Libsass 2026-05-13 5.0 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
There is a stack consumption vulnerability in the lex function in parser.hpp (as used in sassc) in LibSass 3.4.5. A crafted input will lead to a remote denial of service.
CVE-2017-9616 1 Wireshark 1 Wireshark 2026-05-13 4.3 MEDIUM 5.5 MEDIUM
In Wireshark 2.2.7, overly deep mp4 chunks may cause stack exhaustion (uncontrolled recursion) in the dissect_mp4_box function in epan/dissectors/file-mp4.c.
CVE-2017-9729 1 Uclibc 1 Uclibc 2026-05-13 5.0 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
In uClibc 0.9.33.2, there is stack exhaustion (uncontrolled recursion) in the check_dst_limits_calc_pos_1 function in misc/regex/regexec.c when processing a crafted regular expression.
CVE-2017-14861 1 Exiv2 1 Exiv2 2026-05-13 4.3 MEDIUM 5.5 MEDIUM
There is a stack consumption vulnerability in the Exiv2::Internal::stringFormat function of image.cpp in Exiv2 0.26. A Crafted input will lead to a remote denial of service attack.
CVE-2017-8537 1 Microsoft 13 Endpoint Protection, Exchange Server, Forefront Endpoint Protection and 10 more 2026-05-13 4.3 MEDIUM 5.5 MEDIUM
The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to denial of service. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Denial of Service Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8535, CVE-2017-8536, CVE-2017-8539, and CVE-2017-8542.
CVE-2017-8536 1 Microsoft 13 Endpoint Protection, Exchange Server, Forefront Endpoint Protection and 10 more 2026-05-13 4.3 MEDIUM 5.5 MEDIUM
The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to denial of service. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Denial of Service Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8535, CVE-2017-8537, CVE-2017-8539, and CVE-2017-8542.
CVE-2017-10910 1 Mqtt.js Project 1 Mqtt.js 2026-05-13 4.0 MEDIUM 6.5 MEDIUM
MQTT.js 2.x.x prior to 2.15.0 issue in handling PUBLISH tickets may lead to an attacker causing a denial-of-service condition.
CVE-2025-9714 1 Xmlsoft 1 Libxml2 2026-05-12 N/A 6.2 MEDIUM
Uncontrolled recursion in XPath evaluation in libxml2 up to and including version 2.9.14 allows a local attacker to cause a stack overflow via crafted expressions. XPath processing functions `xmlXPathRunEval`, `xmlXPathCtxtCompile`, and `xmlXPathEvalExpr` were resetting recursion depth to zero before making potentially recursive calls. When such functions were called recursively this could allow for uncontrolled recursion and lead to a stack overflow. These functions now preserve recursion depth across recursive calls, allowing recursion depth to be controlled.
CVE-2025-39795 2 Debian, Linux 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel 2026-05-12 N/A 5.5 MEDIUM
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: avoid possible overflow for chunk_sectors check in blk_stack_limits() In blk_stack_limits(), we check that the t->chunk_sectors value is a multiple of the t->physical_block_size value. However, by finding the chunk_sectors value in bytes, we may overflow the unsigned int which holds chunk_sectors, so change the check to be based on sectors.
CVE-2025-38614 2 Debian, Linux 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel 2026-05-12 N/A 5.5 MEDIUM
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: eventpoll: Fix semi-unbounded recursion Ensure that epoll instances can never form a graph deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS+1 links. Currently, ep_loop_check_proc() ensures that the graph is loop-free and does some recursion depth checks, but those recursion depth checks don't limit the depth of the resulting tree for two reasons: - They don't look upwards in the tree. - If there are multiple downwards paths of different lengths, only one of the paths is actually considered for the depth check since commit 28d82dc1c4ed ("epoll: limit paths"). Essentially, the current recursion depth check in ep_loop_check_proc() just serves to prevent it from recursing too deeply while checking for loops. A more thorough check is done in reverse_path_check() after the new graph edge has already been created; this checks, among other things, that no paths going upwards from any non-epoll file with a length of more than 5 edges exist. However, this check does not apply to non-epoll files. As a result, it is possible to recurse to a depth of at least roughly 500, tested on v6.15. (I am unsure if deeper recursion is possible; and this may have changed with commit 8c44dac8add7 ("eventpoll: Fix priority inversion problem").) To fix it: 1. In ep_loop_check_proc(), note the subtree depth of each visited node, and use subtree depths for the total depth calculation even when a subtree has already been visited. 2. Add ep_get_upwards_depth_proc() for similarly determining the maximum depth of an upwards walk. 3. In ep_loop_check(), use these values to limit the total path length between epoll nodes to EP_MAX_NESTS edges.