Total
7724 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2025-8223 | 2025-07-29 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in jerryshensjf JPACookieShop 蛋糕商城JPA版 up to 24a15c02b4f75042c9f7f615a3fed2ec1cefb999. This affects an unknown part of the file AdminTypeCustController.java. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. | |||||
CVE-2025-8104 | 2025-07-29 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
The Memory Usage plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.98. This is due to missing nonce validation in the wpmemory_install_plugin() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to silently install one of the several whitelisted plugins via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
CVE-2025-54528 | 2025-07-29 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2025.07 a CSRF was possible in GitHub App connection flow | |||||
CVE-2024-54172 | 3 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft | 5 Aix, Sterling B2b Integrator, Sterling File Gateway and 2 more | 2025-07-25 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.6 and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. | |||||
CVE-2025-30756 | 1 Oracle | 1 Rest Data Services | 2025-07-25 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
Vulnerability in Oracle REST Data Services (component: General). The supported version that is affected is 24.2.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle REST Data Services. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle REST Data Services, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle REST Data Services accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle REST Data Services accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). | |||||
CVE-2025-30746 | 1 Oracle | 1 Istore | 2025-07-25 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
Vulnerability in the Oracle iStore product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Shopping Cart). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.14. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle iStore. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle iStore, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle iStore accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle iStore accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). | |||||
CVE-2025-6214 | 2025-07-25 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
The Omnishop plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery on its /users/delete REST route in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.9. The route’s permission_callback only verifies that the requester is logged in, but fails to require any nonce or other proof of intent. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary user accounts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
CVE-2025-6054 | 2025-07-25 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
The YANewsflash plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'yanewsflash/yanewsflash.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
CVE-2025-7835 | 2025-07-25 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
The iThoughts Advanced Code Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.10. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'ithoughts_ace_update_options' AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
CVE-2025-7690 | 2025-07-25 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
The Affiliate Plus plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'affiplus_settings' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform an unauthorized action granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
CVE-2021-1257 | 5 Apple, Cisco, Linux and 2 more | 5 Macos, Catalyst Center, Linux Kernel and 2 more | 2025-07-23 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco DNA Center Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to manipulate an authenticated user into executing malicious actions without their awareness or consent. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a web-based management user to follow a specially crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the device with the privileges of the authenticated user. These actions include modifying the device configuration, disconnecting the user's session, and executing Command Runner commands. | |||||
CVE-2025-41661 | 2025-07-23 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
An unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on affected devices due to lack of Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection. | |||||
CVE-2024-11014 | 2025-07-23 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in NEC Corporation UNIVERGE IX from Ver9.2 to Ver10.10.21, for Ver10.8 up to Ver10.8.27 and for Ver10.9 up to Ver10.9.14 allows a attacker to hijack the authentication of screens on the device via the management interface. | |||||
CVE-2023-48790 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortindr | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
A cross site request forgery vulnerability [CWE-352] in Fortinet FortiNDR version 7.4.0, 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 and 7.1.0 through 7.1.1 and before 7.0.5 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized actions via crafted HTTP GET requests. | |||||
CVE-2024-4128 | 1 Google | 1 Firebase Command Line Interface | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 2.6 LOW |
This vulnerability was a potential CSRF attack. When running the Firebase emulator suite, there is an export endpoint that is used normally to export data from running emulators. If a user was running the emulator and navigated to a malicious website with the exploit on a browser that allowed calls to localhost (ie Chrome before v94), the website could exfiltrate emulator data. We recommend upgrading past version 13.6.0 or commit 068a2b08dc308c7ab4b569617f5fc8821237e3a0 https://github.com/firebase/firebase-tools/commit/068a2b08dc308c7ab4b569617f5fc8821237e3a0 | |||||
CVE-2025-50586 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
StudentManage v1.0 was discovered to contain Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). | |||||
CVE-2025-6781 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
The Copymatic – AI Content Writer & Generator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'copymatic-menu' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the copymatic_apikey option via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
CVE-2025-6053 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
The Zuppler Online Ordering plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'zuppler-online-ordering-options' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
CVE-2025-7369 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
The WP Shortcodes Plugin — Shortcodes Ultimate plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the preview function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. In combination with CVE-2025-7354, it leads to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting. | |||||
CVE-2025-7669 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
The Avishi WP PayPal Payment Button plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'avishi-wp-paypal-payment-button/index.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |