Total
8249 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-13970 | 2025-12-13 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH | ||
| OpenPLC_V3 is vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack due to the absence of proper CSRF validation. This issue allows an unauthenticated attacker to trick a logged-in administrator into visiting a maliciously crafted link, potentially enabling unauthorized modification of PLC settings or the upload of malicious programs which could lead to significant disruption or damage to connected systems. | |||||
| CVE-2025-58014 | 1 Ays-pro | 1 Quiz Maker | 2025-12-12 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ays Pro Quiz Maker allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Quiz Maker: from n/a through 6.7.0.61. | |||||
| CVE-2025-62245 | 1 Liferay | 2 Digital Experience Platform, Liferay Portal | 2025-12-12 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Liferay Portal 7.4.1 through 7.4.3.112, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows remote attackers to add and edit publication comments. | |||||
| CVE-2025-10930 | 1 2bits | 1 Currency | 2025-12-12 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Currency allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Currency: from 0.0.0 before 3.5.0. | |||||
| CVE-2025-65573 | 2025-12-12 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in AllskyTeam AllSky v2024.12.06_06 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via function handle_interface_POST_and_status. | |||||
| CVE-2021-47723 | 2025-12-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| STVS ProVision 5.9.10 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform actions with administrative privileges by exploiting unvalidated HTTP requests. Attackers can visit malicious web sites to trigger the forge request, allowing them to create new admin users. | |||||
| CVE-2021-47702 | 2025-12-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| OpenBMCS 2.4 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows attackers to perform actions with administrative privileges by exploiting the sendFeedback.php endpoint. Attackers can submit malicious requests to trigger unintended actions, such as sending emails or modifying system settings. | |||||
| CVE-2025-67639 | 2025-12-12 | N/A | 3.5 LOW | ||
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins 2.540 and earlier, LTS 2.528.2 and earlier allows attackers to trick users into logging in to the attacker's account. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36886 | 2025-12-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| SpinetiX Fusion Digital Signage 3.4.8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that automatically submits a form to create a new admin user with full system privileges when a logged-in user visits the page. | |||||
| CVE-2025-34429 | 2025-12-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| 1Panel versions 1.10.33 - 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web port configuration functionality. The port-change endpoint lacks CSRF defenses such as anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Referer validation. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that submits a port-change request; when a victim visits it while authenticated, the browser includes valid session cookies and the request succeeds. This allows an attacker to change the port on which the 1Panel web service listens, causing loss of access on the original port and resulting in service disruption or denial of service, and may unintentionally expose the service on an attacker-chosen port. | |||||
| CVE-2025-34410 | 2025-12-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| 1Panel versions 1.10.33 - 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Change Username functionality available from the settings panel (/settings/panel). The endpoint does not implement CSRF protections such as anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Referer validation. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that submits a username-change request; when a victim visits the page while authenticated, the browser includes valid session cookies and the request succeeds. This allows an attacker to change the victim’s 1Panel username without consent. After the change, the victim is logged out and unable to log in with the previous username, resulting in account lockout and denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2025-34430 | 2025-12-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| 1Panel versions 1.10.33 through 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the panel name management functionality. The affected endpoint does not implement CSRF defenses such as anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Referer validation. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that submits a panel-name change request; if a victim visits the page while authenticated, the browser includes valid session cookies and the request succeeds. This allows a remote attacker to change the victim’s panel name to an arbitrary value without consent. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36901 | 2025-12-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| UBICOD Medivision Digital Signage 1.5.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that submits a form to the /query/user/itSet endpoint to add a new admin user with elevated privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2025-67646 | 2025-12-12 | N/A | 3.5 LOW | ||
| TableProgressTracking is a MediaWiki extension to track progress against specific criterion. Versions 1.2.0 and below do not enforce CSRF token validation in the REST API. As a result, an attacker could craft a malicious webpage that, when visited by an authenticated user on a wiki with the extension enabled, would trigger unintended authenticated actions through the victim's browser. Due to the lack of token validation, an attacker can delete or track progress against tables. This issue is patched in version 1.2.1 of the extension. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36900 | 2025-12-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| All-Dynamics Digital Signage System 2.0.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative users without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that automatically submits forms to create a new user with global administrative privileges when a logged-in user visits the page. | |||||
| CVE-2025-14165 | 2025-12-12 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Kirim.Email WooCommerce Integration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.9. This is due to missing nonce validation on the plugin's settings page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's API credentials and integration settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-14161 | 2025-12-12 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Truefy Embed plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the 'truefy_embed_options_update' settings update action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings, including the API key, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-14062 | 2025-12-12 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Animated Pixel Marquee Creator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery via the 'marquee' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the marquee deletion function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary marquees via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-14158 | 2025-12-12 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Coding Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings including the theme configuration via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-14391 | 2025-12-12 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Simple Theme Changer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||