Total
1102 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-26911 | 2 Canarymail, Libmailcore | 2 Canary Mail, Mailcore2 | 2024-11-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| core/imap/MCIMAPSession.cpp in Canary Mail before 3.22 has Missing SSL Certificate Validation for IMAP in STARTTLS mode. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26320 | 1 Amd | 114 Epyc 7232p, Epyc 7232p Firmware, Epyc 7251 and 111 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Insufficient validation of the AMD SEV Signing Key (ASK) in the SEND_START command in the SEV Firmware may allow a local authenticated attacker to perform a denial of service of the PSP | |||||
| CVE-2021-25636 | 2 Fedoraproject, Libreoffice | 2 Fedora, Libreoffice | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to contain both "X509Data" and "KeyValue" children of the "KeyInfo" tag, which when opened caused LibreOffice to verify using the "KeyValue" but to report verification with the unrelated "X509Data" value. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7.2 versions prior to 7.2.5. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25634 | 2 Debian, Libreoffice | 2 Debian Linux, Libreoffice | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to modify a digitally signed ODF document to insert an additional signing time timestamp which LibreOffice would incorrectly present as a valid signature signed at the bogus signing time. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7-0 versions prior to 7.0.6; 7-1 versions prior to 7.1.2. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25633 | 2 Debian, Libreoffice | 2 Debian Linux, Libreoffice | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| LibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to create a digitally signed ODF document, by manipulating the documentsignatures.xml or macrosignatures.xml stream within the document to combine multiple certificate data, which when opened caused LibreOffice to display a validly signed indicator but whose content was unrelated to the signature shown. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7-0 versions prior to 7.0.6; 7-1 versions prior to 7.1.2. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24012 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An improper following of a certificate's chain of trust vulnerability in FortiGate versions 6.4.0 to 6.4.4 may allow an LDAP user to connect to SSLVPN with any certificate that is signed by a trusted Certificate Authority. | |||||
| CVE-2021-23167 | 1 Gallagher | 1 Command Centre | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Improper certificate validation vulnerability in SMTP Client allows man-in-the-middle attack to retrieve sensitive information from the Command Centre Server. This issue affects: Gallagher Command Centre 8.50 versions prior to 8.50.2048 (MR3); 8.40 versions prior to 8.40.2063 (MR4); 8.30 versions prior to 8.30.1454 (MR4) ; version 8.20 and prior versions. | |||||
| CVE-2021-23162 | 1 Gallagher | 1 Command Centre Mobile Connect | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.7 HIGH |
| Improper validation of the cloud certificate chain in Mobile Connect allows man-in-the-middle attack to impersonate the legitimate Command Centre Server. This issue affects: Gallagher Command Centre Mobile Connect for Android 15 versions prior to 15.04.040; version 14 and prior versions. | |||||
| CVE-2021-23155 | 1 Gallagher | 1 Command Centre Mobile Client | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 9.0 CRITICAL |
| Improper validation of the cloud certificate chain in Mobile Client allows man-in-the-middle attack to impersonate the legitimate Command Centre Server. This issue affects: Gallagher Command Centre Mobile Client for Android 8.60 versions prior to 8.60.065; version 8.50 and prior versions. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22939 | 5 Debian, Netapp, Nodejs and 2 more | 8 Debian Linux, Nextgen Api, Node.js and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| If the Node.js https API was used incorrectly and "undefined" was in passed for the "rejectUnauthorized" parameter, no error was returned and connections to servers with an expired certificate would have been accepted. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22926 | 5 Haxx, Netapp, Oracle and 2 more | 26 Curl, Active Iq Unified Manager, Clustered Data Ontap and 23 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| libcurl-using applications can ask for a specific client certificate to be used in a transfer. This is done with the `CURLOPT_SSLCERT` option (`--cert` with the command line tool).When libcurl is built to use the macOS native TLS library Secure Transport, an application can ask for the client certificate by name or with a file name - using the same option. If the name exists as a file, it will be used instead of by name.If the appliction runs with a current working directory that is writable by other users (like `/tmp`), a malicious user can create a file name with the same name as the app wants to use by name, and thereby trick the application to use the file based cert instead of the one referred to by name making libcurl send the wrong client certificate in the TLS connection handshake. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22909 | 1 Ui | 2 Edgemax Edgerouter, Edgemax Edgerouter Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability found in EdgeMAX EdgeRouter V2.0.9 and earlier could allow a malicious actor to execute a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack during a firmware update. This vulnerability is fixed in EdgeMAX EdgeRouter V2.0.9-hotfix.1 and later. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22895 | 2 Debian, Nextcloud | 2 Debian Linux, Desktop | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Nextcloud Desktop Client before 3.3.1 is vulnerable to improper certificate validation due to lack of SSL certificate verification when using the "Register with a Provider" flow. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22511 | 1 Microfocus | 1 Application Automation Tools | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Micro Focus Application Automation Tools Plugin - Jenkins plugin. The vulnerability affects version 6.7 and earlier versions. The vulnerability could allow unconditionally disabling of SSL/TLS certificates. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22278 | 2 Abb, Hitachienergy | 2 Update Manager, Pcm600 | 2024-11-21 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| A certificate validation vulnerability in PCM600 Update Manager allows attacker to get unwanted software packages to be installed on computer which has PCM600 installed. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22218 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 2.6 LOW |
| All versions of GitLab CE/EE starting from 12.8 before 13.10.5, all versions starting from 13.11 before 13.11.5, and all versions starting from 13.12 before 13.12.2 were affected by an issue in the handling of x509 certificates that could be used to spoof author of signed commits. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22189 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Starting with version 13.7 the Gitlab CE/EE editions were affected by a security issue related to the validation of the certificates for the Fortinet OTP that could result in authentication issues. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22138 | 1 Elastic | 1 Logstash | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| In Logstash versions after 6.4.0 and before 6.8.15 and 7.12.0 a TLS certificate validation flaw was found in the monitoring feature. When specifying a trusted server CA certificate Logstash would not properly verify the certificate returned by the monitoring server. This could result in a man in the middle style attack against the Logstash monitoring data. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22131 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortitoken Mobile | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| A improper validation of certificate with host mismatch in Fortinet FortiTokenAndroid version 5.0.3 and below, Fortinet FortiTokeniOS version 5.2.0 and below, Fortinet FortiTokenWinApp version 4.0.3 and below allows attacker to retrieve information disclosed via man-in-the-middle attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21959 | 1 Sealevel | 2 Seaconnect 370w, Seaconnect 370w Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| A misconfiguration exists in the MQTTS functionality of Sealevel Systems, Inc. SeaConnect 370W v1.3.34. This misconfiguration significantly simplifies a man-in-the-middle attack, which directly leads to control of device functionality. | |||||