Total
1126 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-22943 | 1 Splunk | 2 Add-on Builder, Cloudconnect Software Development Kit | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| In Splunk Add-on Builder (AoB) versions below 4.1.2 and the Splunk CloudConnect SDK versions below 3.1.3, requests to third-party APIs through the REST API Modular Input incorrectly revert to using HTTP to connect after a failure to connect over HTTPS occurs. | |||||
| CVE-2023-22642 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortianalyzer, Fortimanager | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.5, 6.4.8 through 6.4.10 may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the device and the remote FortiGuard server hosting outbreakalert ressources. | |||||
| CVE-2023-21265 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there are root CA certificates which need to be disabled. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2023-1514 | 1 Hitachienergy | 1 Rtu500 Scripting Interface | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| A vulnerability exists in the component RTU500 Scripting interface. When a client connects to a server using TLS, the server presents a certificate. This certificate links a public key to the identity of the service and is signed by a Certification Authority (CA), allowing the client to validate that the remote service can be trusted and is not malicious. If the client does not validate the parameters of the certificate, then attackers could be able to spoof the identity of the service. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using faking the identity of a RTU500 device and intercepting the messages initiated via the RTU500 Scripting interface. | |||||
| CVE-2023-1055 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 2 Fedora, Directory Server | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in RHDS 11 and RHDS 12. While browsing entries LDAP tries to decode the userPassword attribute instead of the userCertificate attribute which could lead into sensitive information leaked. An attacker with a local account where the cockpit-389-ds is running can list the processes and display the hashed passwords. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0509 | 2 Pyload, Pyload-ng Project | 2 Pyload, Pyload-ng | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| Improper Certificate Validation in GitHub repository pyload/pyload prior to 0.5.0b3.dev44. | |||||
| CVE-2022-4895 | 2 Hitachi, Linux | 3 Infrastructure Analytics Advisor, Ops Center Analyzer, Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.6 HIGH |
| Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor on Linux (Analytics probe component), Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer on Linux (Analyzer probe component) allows Man in the Middle Attack.This issue affects Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor: from 2.0.0-00 through 4.4.0-00; Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer: from 10.0.0-00 before 10.9.1-00. | |||||
| CVE-2022-48308 | 1 Palantir | 1 Sls-logging | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| It was discovered that the sls-logging was not verifying hostnames in TLS certificates due to a misuse of the javax.net.ssl.SSLSocketFactory API. A malicious attacker in a privileged network position could abuse this to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. A successful man-in-the-middle attack would allow them to intercept, read, or modify network communications to and from the affected service. | |||||
| CVE-2022-48307 | 1 Palantir | 1 Magritte-ftp | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| It was discovered that the Magritte-ftp was not verifying hostnames in TLS certificates due to a misuse of the javax.net.ssl.SSLSocketFactory API. A malicious attacker in a privileged network position could abuse this to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. A successful man-in-the-middle attack would allow them to intercept, read, or modify network communications to and from the affected service. In the case of a successful man in the middle attack on magritte-ftp, an attacker would be able to read and modify network traffic such as authentication tokens or raw data entering a Palantir Foundry stack. | |||||
| CVE-2022-48306 | 1 Palantir | 1 Gotham Chat Irc | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability in Gotham Chat IRC helper of Palantir Gotham allows A malicious attacker in a privileged network position could abuse this to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. A successful man-in-the-middle attack would allow them to intercept, read, or modify network communications to and from the affected service. This issue affects: Palantir Palantir Gotham Chat IRC helper versions prior to 30221005.210011.9242. | |||||
| CVE-2022-46153 | 1 Traefik | 1 Traefik | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. In affected versions there is a potential vulnerability in Traefik managing TLS connections. A router configured with a not well-formatted TLSOption is exposed with an empty TLSOption. For instance, a route secured using an mTLS connection set with a wrong CA file is exposed without verifying the client certificates. Users are advised to upgrade to version 2.9.6. Users unable to upgrade should check their logs to detect the error messages and fix your TLS options. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45597 | 1 Componentspace | 1 Saml | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| ComponentSpace.Saml2 4.4.0 Missing SSL Certificate Validation. NOTE: the vendor does not consider this a vulnerability because the report is only about use of certificates at the application layer (not the transport layer) and "Certificates are exchanged in a controlled fashion between entities within a trust relationship. This is why self-signed certificates may be used and why validating certificates isn’t as important as doing so for the transport layer certificates." | |||||
| CVE-2022-45458 | 4 Acronis, Apple, Linux and 1 more | 5 Agent, Cyber Protect, Macos and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Sensitive information disclosure and manipulation due to improper certification validation. The following products are affected: Acronis Agent (Windows, macOS, Linux) before build 29633, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Windows, macOS, Linux) before build 30984. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45457 | 2 Acronis, Microsoft | 3 Agent, Cyber Protect, Windows | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Sensitive information disclosure and manipulation due to improper certification validation. The following products are affected: Acronis Agent (Windows) before build 29633, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Windows) before build 30984. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45100 | 1 Dell | 1 Emc Powerscale Onefs | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions 8.2.x-9.3.x, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to a full compromise of the system. | |||||
| CVE-2022-43892 | 3 Apple, Ibm, Microsoft | 3 Macos, Security Verify Privilege On-premises, Windows | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 3.7 LOW |
| IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate which could disclose sensitive information which could aid further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 240455. | |||||
| CVE-2022-41747 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 2 Windows, Apex One | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An improper certification validation vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One agents could allow a local attacker to load a DLL file with system service privileges on affected installations. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-40147 | 1 Siemens | 1 Industrial Edge Management | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Industrial Edge Management (All versions < V1.5.1). The affected software does not properly validate the server certificate when initiating a TLS connection. This could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the client and the intended server. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3913 | 1 Rapid7 | 1 Nexpose | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Rapid7 Nexpose and InsightVM versions 6.6.82 through 6.6.177 fail to validate the certificate of the update server when downloading updates. This failure could allow an attacker in a privileged position on the network to provide their own HTTPS endpoint, or intercept communications to the legitimate endpoint. The attacker would need some pre-existing access to at least one node on the network path between the Rapid7-controlled update server and the Nexpose/InsightVM application, and the ability to either spoof the update server's FQDN or redirect legitimate traffic to the attacker's server in order to exploit this vulnerability. Note that even in this scenario, an attacker could not normally replace an update package with a malicious package, since the update process validates a separate, code-signing certificate, distinct from the HTTPS certificate used for communication. This issue was resolved on February 1, 2023 in update 6.6.178 of Nexpose and InsightVM. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3761 | 1 Openvpn | 1 Connect | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| OpenVPN Connect versions before 3.4.0.4506 (macOS) and OpenVPN Connect before 3.4.0.3100 (Windows) allows man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept configuration profile download requests which contains the users credentials | |||||