Total
2864 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-0091 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to execute code in the launcher process due to an over-privileged shell user. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0089 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple functions of PackageInstallerService.java, there is a possible way to install unverified apps due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-14551 | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| The servereye client (also known as sensorhub, technically ClientAgentContainerService) versions 20.15 and earlier are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation. The high-privileged service SE3Recovery (EmergencyRecoveryService.exe), running as SYSTEM, periodically monitors the directory %ProgramData%\ServerEye3\update\ for a trigger file named "update_available". Due to insufficient access restrictions on this directory, a local standard user can create the trigger file and provide a path to a directory containing malicious JSON instructions. The service subsequently executes the utility UpdaterAction.exe with SYSTEM privileges, which parses the instructions and performs an unvalidated file copy from a user-controlled source to a protected system destination (e.g., overwriting a service binary). This leads to full system compromise as the service automatically restarts the overwritten binary with SYSTEM privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2026-50391 | 1 Microsoft | 12 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 9 more | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Improper privilege management in Windows Group Policy allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | |||||
| CVE-2026-50343 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2 and 6 more | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Improper privilege management in Microsoft Install Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | |||||
| CVE-2026-50295 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 25h2, Windows 11 26h1 and 1 more | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Improper privilege management in Microsoft Windows DNS allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally. | |||||
| CVE-2026-49176 | 1 Microsoft | 11 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 8 more | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Improper privilege management in Windows WalletService allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | |||||
| CVE-2026-47416 | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL | ||
| PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 are vulnerable to vertical privilege escalation. The `PATCH /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members/{user_id}` endpoint is gated by `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)`, which defaults to `min_role="member"` and is never overridden by the route. The handler then calls `MemberService.update_role(workspace_id, user_id, body.role)` which sets the target member's role to whatever the request body specifies, with no check that the caller has owner-or-admin privilege, no check that the new role is not higher than the caller's own, and no check that the caller is not silently promoting themselves. PraisonAI Platform version 0.1.4 patches the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2026-47413 | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL | ||
| PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 have aprivilege escalation / cross-tenant member injection. The `POST /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members` endpoint is gated only by `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` (default `min_role="member"`) and forwards the request body's `user_id` and `role` straight into `MemberService.add(workspace_id, user_id, role)`, which has no caller-permission check. A user with the lowest workspace privilege can add any user (including a new attacker-controlled second account, or an existing account they want to grief) as owner of the workspace. PraisonAI Platform version 0.1.4 patches the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2026-47407 | 2026-07-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
| PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 0.1.4, the Platform server exposes resources under `/api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/...` and protects them with a `require_workspace_member(workspace_id)` FastAPI dependency. The dependency only checks that the caller is a member of the workspace_id in the URL prefix. The route handlers then look up the inner resource (`agent_id`, `issue_id`, `project_id`, `label_id`, `comment_id`, `dependency_id`) by primary key alone. The resource's own `workspace_id` is never compared to the URL's `workspace_id`. A user can therefore put their own workspace in the URL prefix and any other workspace's resource ID in the path. The auth check passes, since they really are a member of the prefix workspace. The service then returns the cross-tenant resource for read, update, or delete. There is a second bug in the member-management routes (`add_member`, `update_member_role`, `remove_member`, `update_workspace`, `delete_workspace`). Each one inherits the default `min_role="member"` from `require_workspace_member`. Any basic member can therefore promote themselves to admin or owner, demote or remove other members, and delete the workspace. The role hierarchy exists in the schema but is not enforced. Registration is open at `/api/v1/auth/register` with no email verification. The default server bind is `0.0.0.0:8000` (`python -m praisonai_platform`). One curl from any unauthenticated network position is enough to bootstrap into the system. PraisonAI Platform version 0.1.4 patches the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0048 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| In hide of WindowState.java, there is a possible way to trick the user into approving permissions due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0055 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| In createSessionInternal of PackageInstallerService.java, there is a possible to update a Device Policy Controller (DPC) into an invalid directory due to a path traversal error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0016 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 3.3 LOW |
| In updateProvidersWhenServiceRemoved of CredentialManagerService.java, there is a possible way to override settings across users due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0050 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 3.3 LOW |
| In handleBondStateChanged of AdapterService.java, there is a possible sensitive information disclosure due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0046 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| In InputInterceptor of Letterbox.java, there is a possible way to trick a user into accepting a permission due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-48210 | 1 Otrs | 1 Otrs | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| An improper default configuration in OTRS 2026.3.1 causes ticket article forwarding actions to enforce the “Is visible for customer” flag by default and prevent users from disabling it via the UI. This leads to unintended exposure of internal ticket information to the External Frontend This issue affects OTRS 2026.3.1 | |||||
| CVE-2026-10217 | 2026-07-22 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A flaw has been found in nextlevelbuilder GoClaw up to 3.11.3. The impacted element is the function handleSave of the file internal/http/tts_config.go of the component RoleAdmin Gateway. This manipulation causes improper privilege management. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project tagged the reported issue as bug. | |||||
| CVE-2026-47744 | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL | ||
| Shopper is a Headless e-commerce Admin Panel. Prior to 2.8.0, two distinct authorization defects in the team settings allowed any authenticated panel user to take over the RBAC system. Settings/Team/Index had no mount() authorization. Any authenticated user could load the page and use its public actions to create new roles and delete other users, including administrators. Settings/Team/RolePermission gated its write actions on the read-only view_users permission. Any user holding view_users could grant themselves or any other user arbitrary permissions, including manage_users and edit_orders, effectively escalating to full panel administrator from a read-only account. Combined, these two defects allow a low-privilege authenticated user to obtain administrator privileges and remove the legitimate administrators from the panel. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.8.0. | |||||
| CVE-2026-45632 | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL | ||
| Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). In 0.26.7 and earlier, the schedule router does not enforce organization/role checks. As a result, any authenticated user can create, update, run, or delete schedules belonging to other organizations if they know the scheduleId/serverId. Schedule types server and dokploy-server write and execute scripts on the host or remote servers, enabling RCE on the Dokploy host or a target server. | |||||
| CVE-2026-7465 | 2026-07-22 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| The Spectra Gutenberg Blocks – Website Builder for the Block Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 2.19.25. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to execute code on the server. Exploitation requires a two-block payload embedded in post content: the first block registers a fake uagb/-prefixed block type with an attacker-specified render_callback, and the second block of the same fake type triggers invocation of that callback via call_user_func() during sequential block rendering in the same page request. | |||||