Total
2540 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-11296 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-06-09 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Inappropriate implementation in ImageCapture in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to perform privilege escalation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11616 | 2026-06-09 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| The Events Calendar for GeoDirectory plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in versions up to and including 2.3.28. This is due to the ajax_ayi_action() handler only applying strip_tags(esc_sql()) — with no allow-list — to the attacker-controlled $_POST['type'] and $_POST['postid'] values before forwarding them to update_ayi_data(), which calls update_user_meta($current_user->ID, $rsvp_args['type'], $posts). By passing type=wp_capabilities and postid=administrator, an attacker writes ['subscriber'=>true,'administrator'=>'administrator'] into their own wp_capabilities user meta; WP_User::get_role_caps() then treats the 'administrator' array key as an active role on the next request. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to elevate their privileges to Administrator. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54821 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortios, Fortipam, Fortiproxy | 2026-06-09 | N/A | 1.9 LOW |
| An Improper Privilege Management vulnerability [CWE-269] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiOS 7.4 all versions, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.6.0, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiProxy 7.4 all versions, FortiProxy 7.2 all versions, FortiProxy 7.0 all versions may allow an authenticated administrator to bypass the trusted host policy via crafted CLI command. | |||||
| CVE-2026-11308 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-06-08 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| Inappropriate implementation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to perform privilege escalation via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11295 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2026-06-08 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Inappropriate implementation in WebView in Google Chrome on Android prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to perform privilege escalation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11423 | 2026-06-08 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in the Altium Enterprise Server Collaboration Service due to improper handling of user-supplied filenames in the MCAD and Simulation file download flows. A regular authenticated user can submit a collaboration message containing a crafted filename, which is later used to construct the download path on the server without validation, allowing arbitrary files to be read from the server filesystem. Because the readable files include the server's master configuration, which stores credentials for privileged accounts, exploitation can lead to authenticating as a system administrator and gaining full control of the server. Altium 365 cloud deployments are not affected. | |||||
| CVE-2026-11103 | 2 Google, Microsoft | 2 Chrome, Windows | 2026-06-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Inappropriate implementation in Installer in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a local attacker to perform OS-level privilege escalation via a malicious file. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2026-11108 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2026-06-08 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Inappropriate implementation in NFC in Google Chrome on Android prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to perform privilege escalation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2026-44543 | 1 Suse | 1 Local Path Provisioner | 2026-06-08 | N/A | 8.7 HIGH |
| Local Path Provisioner provides a way for the Kubernetes users to utilize the local storage in each node. Prior to 0.0.36, a malicious user with permission to edit the local-path-config ConfigMap in the local-path-storage namespace can manipulate the helperPod.yaml template used by rancher/local-path-provisioner. The helperPod.yaml template is loaded by the provisioner and used to create HelperPods during PVC provisioning and cleanup operations. However, the template is not sufficiently validated before use. Security-sensitive fields such as securityContext.privileged, hostPath volumes, and Linux capabilities can be injected into the template. When a PVC operation triggers HelperPod creation, the provisioner creates the HelperPod using the attacker-controlled template. This can result in a privileged pod running on the target node with the host root filesystem mounted. This may allow the attacker to access sensitive host files, read ServiceAccount tokens from other pods on the same node, access other tenants' local-path volume data, or modify files on the host node. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.0.36. | |||||
| CVE-2026-5141 | 2026-06-06 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| Improper Privilege Management, Improper Access Control, Incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability in TUBITAK BILGEM Software Technologies Research Institute Pardus Software Center allows Hijacking a privileged process. This issue affects Pardus Software Center: from 1.0.2 before 1.0.3. | |||||
| CVE-2026-11276 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-06-05 | N/A | 5.1 MEDIUM |
| Inappropriate implementation in Cast in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed an attacker on the local network segment to bypass discretionary access control via malicious network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||
| CVE-2018-19608 | 2 Arm, Trustedfirmware | 2 Mbed Tls, Mbed Tls | 2026-06-05 | 1.9 LOW | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| Arm Mbed TLS before 2.14.1, before 2.7.8, and before 2.1.17 allows a local unprivileged attacker to recover the plaintext of RSA decryption, which is used in RSA-without-(EC)DH(E) cipher suites. | |||||
| CVE-2025-5088 | 2026-06-05 | N/A | 8.3 HIGH | ||
| An authenticated Redis session could be used to obtain full root access to all servers in the CVX cluster. Note that this would require an attacker to have both network access to the Redis service on a CVX server and the Redis password. Please note that all Redis communication, including authentication, occurs over plaintext in the present day. TLS support is tracked under RFE1294850. | |||||
| CVE-2026-9490 | 1 Acer | 1 Care Center | 2026-06-04 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A security vulnerability has been identified in Acer Care Center where the ACCSvc service creates a Named Pipe with a weak Security Descriptor. This vulnerability allows an authenticated local user to connect and send a specially crafted message (message type 0x03) to the pipe, causing the service to crash with exit code 1067 (ERROR_PROCESS_ABORTED). To mitigate this potential local service disruption, Acer requires users to update the software to the latest version. | |||||
| CVE-2026-49189 | 1 Acer | 2 Connect M6e 5g, Connect M6e 5g Firmware | 2026-06-04 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Unchecked public access permissions on a core Broadcast Receiver allow unauthorized local software components to invoke administrative operations. | |||||
| CVE-2023-26246 | 1 Hyundai | 2 Gen5w L, Gen5w L Firmware | 2026-06-04 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in the Hyundai Gen5W_L in-vehicle infotainment system AE_E_PE_EUR.S5W_L001.001.211214. The AppUpgrade binary file, which is used during the firmware installation process, can be modified by an attacker to bypass the digital signature check. This indirectly allows an attacker to install custom firmware in the IVI system. | |||||
| CVE-2023-26244 | 1 Hyundai | 2 Gen5w L, Gen5w L Firmware | 2026-06-04 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in the Hyundai Gen5W_L in-vehicle infotainment system AE_E_PE_EUR.S5W_L001.001.211214. The AppDMClient binary file, which is used during the firmware installation process, can be modified by an attacker to bypass the digital signature check of AppUpgrade and .lge.upgrade.xml files, which are used during the firmware installation process. This indirectly allows an attacker to use a custom version of AppUpgrade and .lge.upgrade.xml files. | |||||
| CVE-2023-26245 | 1 Hyundai | 2 Gen5w L, Gen5w L Firmware | 2026-06-04 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in the Hyundai Gen5W_L in-vehicle infotainment system AE_E_PE_EUR.S5W_L001.001.211214. The AppUpgrade binary file, which is used during the firmware installation process, can be modified by an attacker to bypass the version check in order to install any firmware version (e.g., newer, older, or customized). This indirectly allows an attacker to install custom firmware in the IVI system. | |||||
| CVE-2023-26243 | 1 Hyundai | 2 Gen5w L, Gen5w L Firmware | 2026-06-04 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in the Hyundai Gen5W_L in-vehicle infotainment system AE_E_PE_EUR.S5W_L001.001.211214. The decryption binary used to decrypt firmware files has an information leak that allows an attacker to read the AES key and initialization vector from memory. An attacker may exploit this to create custom firmware that may be installed in the IVI system. Then, an attacker may be able to install a backdoor in the IVI system that may allow him to control it, if it is connected to the Internet through Wi-Fi. | |||||
| CVE-2026-10868 | 2026-06-04 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A mass assignment vulnerability exists in the MISP user edit functionality due to insufficient filtering of user-supplied fields in UsersController::edit(). When processing edit requests, the application accepted a user-controlled User.id value from request data. An authenticated attacker could craft a modified request containing another user identifier, potentially causing updates to be applied to an unintended user account. Depending on the editable fields and the attacker’s privileges, this could allow unauthorized modification of user account attributes and impact account integrity. The issue was addressed by explicitly removing the User.id field from request data before processing the user edit operation. | |||||