Total
8067 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-6560 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Addonify – Quick View For WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.16. This is due the plugin utilizing mobiledetect without preventing direct access to the files. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6553 | 1 Wp-meteor | 1 Wp Meteor | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The WP Meteor Website Speed Optimization Addon plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.3.This is due to the plugin utilizing wpdesk and leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6549 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Admin Post Navigation plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to the plugin utilizing bootstrap and leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6548 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Add Admin JavaScript plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.0. This is due to the plugin utilizing bootstrap and leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6547 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Add Admin CSS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.1. This is due to the plugin utilizing bootstrap and leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6546 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The One Click Close Comments plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.1. This is due to the plugin utilizing bootstrap and leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6545 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Admin Trim Interface plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 3.5.1. This is due to the plugin utilizing bootstrap and leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6506 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH | ||
| Information exposure vulnerability in the MRW plugin, in its 5.4.3 version, affecting the "mrw_log" functionality. This vulnerability could allow a remote attacker to obtain other customers' order information and access sensitive information such as name and phone number. This vulnerability also allows an attacker to create or overwrite shipping labels. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6426 | 1 Mesbook | 1 Mesbook | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Information exposure vulnerability in MESbook 20221021.03 version, the exploitation of which could allow a local attacker, with user privileges, to access different resources by changing the API value of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6421 | 1 Pepperl-fuchs | 8 Oit1500-f113-b12-cb, Oit1500-f113-b12-cb Firmware, Oit200-f113-b12-cb and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can read out sensitive device information through a incorrectly configured FTP service. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6407 | 1 Schneider-electric | 2 Whc-5918a, Whc-5918a Firmware | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| CWE-200: Information Exposure vulnerability exists that could cause disclosure of credentials when a specially crafted message is sent to the device. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6398 | 1 Skyhighsecurity | 1 Secure Web Gateway | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure vulnerability in SWG in versions 12.x prior to 12.2.10 and 11.x prior to 11.2.24 allows information stored in a customizable block page to be disclosed to third-party websites due to Same Origin Policy Bypass of browsers in certain scenarios. The risk is low, because other recommended default security policies such as URL categorization and GTI are in place in most policies to block access to uncategorized/high risk websites. Any information disclosed depends on how the customers have customized the block pages. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6395 | 1 Github | 1 Enterprise Server | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An exposure of sensitive information vulnerability in GitHub Enterprise Server would allow an attacker to enumerate the names of private repositories that utilize deploy keys. This vulnerability did not allow unauthorized access to any repository content besides the name. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.14 and was fixed in versions 3.13.1, 3.12.6, 3.11.12, 3.10.14, and 3.9.17. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6336 | 1 Github | 1 Enterprise Server | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A Security Misconfiguration vulnerability in GitHub Enterprise Server allowed sensitive information disclosure to unauthorized users in GitHub Enterprise Server by exploiting organization ruleset feature. This attack required an organization member to explicitly change the visibility of a dependent repository from private to public. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.14 and was fixed in versions 3.13.1, 3.12.6, 3.11.12, 3.10.14, and 3.9.17. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6294 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 3.9 LOW | ||
| udn News Android APP stores the user session in logcat file when user log into the APP. A malicious APP or an attacker with physical access to the Android device can retrieve this session and use it to log into the news APP and other services provided by udn. | |||||
| CVE-2024-5753 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| vanna-ai/vanna version v0.3.4 is vulnerable to SQL injection in some file-critical functions such as `pg_read_file()`. This vulnerability allows unauthenticated remote users to read arbitrary local files on the victim server, including sensitive files like `/etc/passwd`, by exploiting the exposed SQL queries via a Python Flask API. | |||||
| CVE-2024-5614 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Piotnet Addons For Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.29 via the 'pafe_posts_list' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including titles and excerpts of future, draft, and pending blog posts. | |||||
| CVE-2024-5535 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL | ||
| Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer. Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists). This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem. In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur. This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available. | |||||
| CVE-2024-5524 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Information exposure vulnerability in Astrotalks affecting version 10/03/2023. This vulnerability allows unregistered users to access all internal links of the application without providing any credentials. | |||||
| CVE-2024-5464 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| Vulnerability of insufficient permission verification in the NearLink module Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality. | |||||