Total
11982 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2018-7039 | 1 Ccn-lite | 1 Ccn-lite | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
CCN-lite 2.0.0 Beta allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (buffer overflow) or possibly have unspecified other impact because the ccnl_ndntlv_prependBlob function in ccnl-pkt-ndntlv.c can be called with wrong arguments. Specifically, there is an incorrect integer data type causing a negative third argument in some cases of crafted TLV data with inconsistent length information. | |||||
CVE-2018-6953 | 1 Ccn-lite | 1 Ccn-lite | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
In CCN-lite 2, the Parser of NDNTLV does not verify whether a certain component's length field matches the actual component length, which has a resultant buffer overflow and out-of-bounds memory accesses. | |||||
CVE-2018-6948 | 1 Ccn-lite | 1 Ccn-lite | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
In CCN-lite 2, the function ccnl_prefix_to_str_detailed can cause a buffer overflow, when writing a prefix to the buffer buf. The maximal size of the prefix is CCNL_MAX_PREFIX_SIZE; the buffer has the size CCNL_MAX_PREFIX_SIZE. However, when NFN is enabled, additional characters are written to the buffer (e.g., the "NFN" and "R2C" tags). Therefore, sending an NFN-R2C packet with a prefix of size CCNL_MAX_PREFIX_SIZE can cause an overflow of buf inside ccnl_prefix_to_str_detailed. | |||||
CVE-2018-6892 | 1 Cloudme | 1 Sync | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
An issue was discovered in CloudMe before 1.11.0. An unauthenticated remote attacker that can connect to the "CloudMe Sync" client application listening on port 8888 can send a malicious payload causing a buffer overflow condition. This will result in an attacker controlling the program's execution flow and allowing arbitrary code execution. | |||||
CVE-2018-6876 | 2 Imagemagick, Libfpx Project | 2 Imagemagick, Libfpx | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
The OLEProperty class in ole/oleprop.cpp in libfpx 1.3.1-10, as used in ImageMagick 7.0.7-22 Q16 and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack-based buffer under-read) via a crafted bmp image. | |||||
CVE-2018-6857 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x802022E0. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where the constant 0x12 will be written to a user-controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to modify the SEP_TOKEN_PRIVILEGES structure of the Token object belonging to the exploit process and grant SE_DEBUG_NAME privilege. This allows the exploit process to interact with higher privileged processes running as SYSTEM and execute code in their security context. | |||||
CVE-2018-6856 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x8020601C. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where a global variable will be written to a user controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to zero-out the pointer to the security descriptor in the object header of a privileged process or modify the security descriptor itself and run code in the context of a process running as SYSTEM. | |||||
CVE-2018-6855 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x80202014. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where the constant 0xFFFFFFF will be written to a user-controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to modify the SEP_TOKEN_PRIVILEGES structure of the Token object belonging to the exploit process and grant SE_DEBUG_NAME privilege. This allows the exploit process to interact with higher privileged processes running as SYSTEM and execute code in their security context. | |||||
CVE-2018-6854 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via multiple IOCTLs, e.g., 0x8810200B, 0x8810200F, 0x8810201B, 0x8810201F, 0x8810202B, 0x8810202F, 0x8810203F, 0x8810204B, 0x88102003, 0x88102007, 0x88102013, 0x88102017, 0x88102027, 0x88102033, 0x88102037, 0x88102043, and 0x88102047. When some conditions in the user-controlled input buffer are not met, the driver writes an error code (0x2000001A) to a user-controlled address. Also, note that all the aforementioned IOCTLs use transfer type METHOD_NEITHER, which means that the I/O manager does not validate any of the supplied pointers and buffer sizes. So, even though the driver checks for input/output buffer sizes, it doesn't validate if the pointers to those buffers are actually valid. So, we can supply a pointer for the output buffer to a kernel address space address, and the error code will be written there. We can take advantage of this condition to modify the SEP_TOKEN_PRIVILEGES structure of the Token object belonging to the exploit process and grant SE_DEBUG_NAME privilege. This allows the exploit process to interact with higher privileged processes running as SYSTEM and execute code in their security context. | |||||
CVE-2018-6853 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x80206024. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where a global variable will be written to a user controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to zero-out the pointer to the security descriptor in the object header of a privileged process or modify the security descriptor itself and run code in the context of a process running as SYSTEM. | |||||
CVE-2018-6852 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x80202298. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where the nt!memset function is called to zero out contents of a user-controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to zero-out the pointer to the security descriptor in the object header of a privileged process or modify the security descriptor itself and run code in the context of a process running as SYSTEM. | |||||
CVE-2018-6851 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x80206040. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where the constant DWORD 0 will be written to a user-controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to zero-out the pointer to the security descriptor in the object header of a privileged process or modify the security descriptor itself and run code in the context of a process running as SYSTEM. | |||||
CVE-2018-6799 | 2 Debian, Graphicsmagick | 2 Debian Linux, Graphicsmagick | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
The AcquireCacheNexus function in magick/pixel_cache.c in GraphicsMagick before 1.3.28 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap overwrite) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted image file, because a pixel staging area is not used. | |||||
CVE-2018-6537 | 1 Flexense | 1 Syncbreeze | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
A buffer overflow vulnerability in the control protocol of Flexense SyncBreeze Enterprise v10.4.18 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending a crafted packet to TCP port 9121. | |||||
CVE-2018-6481 | 1 Flexense | 1 Disksavvy | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
A buffer overflow vulnerability in the control protocol of Disk Savvy Enterprise v10.4.18 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending a crafted packet to TCP port 9124. | |||||
CVE-2018-6414 | 1 Hikvision | 1 Ip Cameras | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
A buffer overflow vulnerability in the web server of some Hikvision IP Cameras allows an attacker to send a specially crafted message to affected devices. Due to the insufficient input validation, successful exploit can corrupt memory and lead to arbitrary code execution or crash the process. | |||||
CVE-2018-6413 | 1 Hikvision | 2 Ds-2cd9111-s, Ds-2cd9111-s Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
There is a buffer overflow in the Hikvision Camera DS-2CD9111-S of V4.1.2 build 160203 and before, and this vulnerability allows remote attackers to launch a denial of service attack (service interruption) via a crafted network setting interface request. | |||||
CVE-2018-6390 | 1 Wps | 1 Wps Office | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
The WStr::assign function in kso.dll in Kingsoft WPS Office 10.1.0.7106 and 10.2.0.5978 does not validate the size of the source memory block before an _copy call, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (access violation and application crash) via a crafted (a) web page, (b) office document, or (c) .rtf file. | |||||
CVE-2018-6381 | 2 Canonical, Zziplib Project | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Zziplib | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
In ZZIPlib 0.13.67, 0.13.66, 0.13.65, 0.13.64, 0.13.63, 0.13.62, 0.13.61, 0.13.60, 0.13.59, 0.13.58, 0.13.57 and 0.13.56 there is a segmentation fault caused by invalid memory access in the zzip_disk_fread function (zzip/mmapped.c) because the size variable is not validated against the amount of file->stored data. | |||||
CVE-2018-6339 | 1 Whatsapp | 1 Whatsapp | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
When receiving calls using WhatsApp on Android, a stack allocation failed to properly account for the amount of data being passed in. An off-by-one error meant that data was written beyond the allocated space on the stack. This issue affects WhatsApp for Android starting in version 2.18.180 and was fixed in version 2.18.295. It also affects WhatsApp Business for Android starting in version v2.18.103 and was fixed in version v2.18.150. |