Export limit exceeded: 30078 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (30078 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-53243 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk Enterprise, Splunk Secure Gateway | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.3.2, 9.2.4, and 9.1.7 and versions below 3.2.462, 3.7.18, and 3.8.5 of the Splunk Secure Gateway app on Splunk Cloud Platform, a low-privileged user that does not hold the “admin“ or “power“ Splunk roles could see alert search query responses using Splunk Secure Gateway App Key Value Store (KVstore) collections endpoints due to improper access control. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24981 | 1 Intel | 3 Intel Server D50fcp Family, Intel Server M50fcp Family, Server Board S2600bp Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Improper input validation in PfrSmiUpdateFw driver in UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) Server M50FCP Family products may allow a privileged user to enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25008 | 1 Ericsson | 2 Controller 6610, Ran Compute | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| Ericsson RAN Compute and Site Controller 6610 contains a vulnerability in the Control System where Improper Input Validation can lead to arbitrary code execution, for example to obtain a Linux Shell with the same privileges as the attacker. The attacker would require elevated privileges for example a valid OAM user having the system administrator role to exploit the vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25009 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Ericsson Packet Core Controller (PCC) contains a vulnerability in Access and Mobility Management Function (AMF) where improper input validation can lead to denial of service which may result in service degradation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53827 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Ericsson Packet Core Controller (PCC) contains a vulnerability where an attacker sending a large volume of specially crafted messages may cause service degradation | ||||
| CVE-2024-53858 | 1 Github | 1 Cli | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| The gh cli is GitHub’s official command line tool. A security vulnerability has been identified in the GitHub CLI that could leak authentication tokens when cloning repositories containing `git` submodules hosted outside of GitHub.com and ghe.com. This vulnerability stems from several `gh` commands used to clone a repository with submodules from a non-GitHub host including `gh repo clone`, `gh repo fork`, and `gh pr checkout`. These GitHub CLI commands invoke git with instructions to retrieve authentication tokens using the `credential.helper` configuration variable for any host encountered. Prior to version `2.63.0`, hosts other than GitHub.com and ghe.com are treated as GitHub Enterprise Server hosts and have tokens sourced from the following environment variables before falling back to host-specific tokens stored within system-specific secured storage: 1. `GITHUB_ENTERPRISE_TOKEN`, 2. `GH_ENTERPRISE_TOKEN` and 3. `GITHUB_TOKEN` when the `CODESPACES` environment variable is set. The result being `git` sending authentication tokens when cloning submodules. In version `2.63.0`, these GitHub CLI commands will limit the hosts for which `gh` acts as a credential helper to source authentication tokens. Additionally, `GITHUB_TOKEN` will only be used for GitHub.com and ghe.com. Users are advised to upgrade. Additionally users are advised to revoke authentication tokens used with the GitHub CLI and to review their personal security log and any relevant audit logs for actions associated with their account or enterprise | ||||
| CVE-2021-47717 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| IntelliChoice eFORCE Software Suite 2.5.9 contains a username enumeration vulnerability that allows attackers to enumerate valid users by exploiting the 'ctl00$MainContent$UserName' POST parameter. Attackers can send requests with valid usernames to retrieve user information. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32958 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Adept is a language for general purpose programming. Prior to commit a1a41b7, the remoteBuild.yml workflow file uses actions/upload-artifact@v4 to upload the mac-standalone artifact. This artifact is a zip of the current directory, which includes the automatically generated .git/config file containing the run's GITHUB_TOKEN. Seeing as the artifact can be downloaded prior to the end of the workflow, there is a few seconds where an attacker can extract the token from the artifact and use it with the Github API to push malicious code or rewrite release commits in the AdeptLanguage/Adept repository. This issue has been patched in commit a1a41b7. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54002 | 1 Dependencytrack | 1 Dependency-track | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Dependency-Track is a Component Analysis platform that allows organizations to identify and reduce risk in the software supply chain. Performing a login request against the /api/v1/user/login endpoint with a username that exist in the system takes significantly longer than performing the same action with a username that is not known by the system. The observable difference in request duration can be leveraged by actors to enumerate valid names of managed users. LDAP and OpenID Connect users are not affected. The issue has been fixed in Dependency-Track 4.12.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54009 | 2026-04-15 | 4 Medium | ||
| Remote authentication bypass vulnerability in HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 in versions prior to version 10.4.5 could be remotely exploited to allow disclosure of information. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47923 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Mashov – CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor | ||||
| CVE-2024-11351 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Restrict – membership, site, content and user access restrictions for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.8 via the WordPress core search feature. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data from posts that have been restricted to higher-level roles such as administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11295 | 2 Pluginsandsnippets, Wordpress | 2 Simple Page Access Restriction, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Simple Page Access Restriction plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.29 via the WordPress core search feature. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data from posts that have been restricted to higher-level roles such as logged-in users. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25116 | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| RedisBloom adds a set of probabilistic data structures to Redis. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.4.7 and 2.6.10, authenticated users can use the `CF.RESERVE` command to trigger a runtime assertion and termination of the Redis server process. The problem is fixed in RedisBloom 2.4.7 and 2.6.10. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11294 | 2 Memberful, Wordpress | 2 Memberful, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Memberful plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.73.9 via the WordPress core search feature. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data from posts that have been restricted to higher-level roles such as site members. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54140 | 1 Sigstore | 1 Sigstore-java | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| sigstore-java is a sigstore java client for interacting with sigstore infrastructure. sigstore-java has insufficient verification for a situation where a bundle provides a invalid signature for a checkpoint. This bug impacts clients using any variation of KeylessVerifier.verify(). Currently checkpoints are only used to ensure the root hash of an inclusion proof was provided by the log in question. Failing to validate that means a bundle may provide an inclusion proof that doesn't actually correspond to the log in question. This may eventually lead a monitor/witness being unable to detect when a compromised logs are providing different views of themselves to different clients. There are other mechanisms right now that mitigate this, such as the signed entry timestamp. Sigstore-java currently requires a valid signed entry timestamp. By correctly verifying the signed entry timestamp we can make certain assertions about the log signing the log entry (like the log was aware of the artifact signing event and signed it). Therefore the impact on clients that are not monitors/witnesses is very low. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54454 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| An issue was discovered in Kurmi Provisioning Suite before 7.9.0.35, 7.10.x through 7.10.0.18, and 7.11.x through 7.11.0.15. An Observable Response Discrepancy vulnerability in the sendPasswordReinitLink action of the unlogged.do page allows remote attackers to test whether a username is valid or not. This allows confirmation of valid usernames. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25131 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| A flaw was found in the MustGather.managed.openshift.io Custom Defined Resource (CRD) of OpenShift Dedicated. A non-privileged user on the cluster can create a MustGather object with a specially crafted file and set the most privileged service account to run the job. This can allow a standard developer user to escalate their privileges to a cluster administrator and pivot to the AWS environment. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11292 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wp Private Content Plus Plugin | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The WP Private Content Plus plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.1 via the WordPress core search feature. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data from posts that have been restricted to higher-level roles such as administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11290 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Member Access plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.6 via the WordPress core search feature. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data from posts that have been restricted to higher-level roles such as administrator. | ||||