Export limit exceeded: 36406 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (36406 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-7755 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-26 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow remote code execution due to incomplete validation enforcement on MCP server configuration files. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13448 | 5 Apple, Ibm, Langflow and 2 more | 5 Macos, Langflow Oss, Langflow and 2 more | 2026-07-26 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 Lanflow OSS contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the public flow build endpoint ( /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow ). The vulnerability stems from an incomplete denylist in the validate_public_flow_no_code_execution() function that fails to block several code-execution agent components including OpenDsStarAgent, CodeActAgentSmolagents, and CSVAgent. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53393 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-07-24 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: reset write verifier on deferred writeback errors nfsd_vfs_write() and nfsd_commit() both call filemap_check_wb_err() to detect deferred writeback errors, but neither rotates the server's write verifier (nn->writeverf) when this check fails. Every other durable-storage-failure path in these functions calls commit_reset_write_verifier() before returning an error. The missing rotation means clients holding UNSTABLE write data under the current verifier will COMMIT, receive the unchanged verifier back, and conclude their data is durable — silently dropping data that failed writeback. This violates the UNSTABLE+COMMIT durability contract (RFC 1813 §3.3.7, RFC 8881 §18.32). Add commit_reset_write_verifier() calls at both filemap_check_wb_err() error sites, matching the pattern used by adjacent error paths in the same functions. The helper already filters -EAGAIN and -ESTALE internally, so the calls are unconditionally safe. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53332 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-07-24 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: slimbus: qcom-ngd-ctrl: Register callbacks after creating the ngd When the remoteproc starts in parallel with the NGD driver being probed, or the remoteproc is already up when the PDR lookup is being registered, or in the theoretical event that we get an interrupt from the hardware, these callbacks will operate on uninitialized data. This result in issues to boot the affected boards. One such example can be seen in the following fault, where qcom_slim_ngd_ssr_pdr_notify() schedules work on the NULL ngd_up_work. [ 21.858578] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 21.858745] WARNING: kernel/workqueue.c:2338 at __queue_work+0x5e0/0x790, CPU#2: kworker/2:2/116 ... [ 21.859251] Call trace: [ 21.859255] __queue_work+0x5e0/0x790 (P) [ 21.859265] queue_work_on+0x6c/0xf0 [ 21.859273] qcom_slim_ngd_ssr_pdr_notify+0x110/0x150 [slim_qcom_ngd_ctrl] [ 21.859304] qcom_slim_ngd_ssr_notify+0x24/0x40 [slim_qcom_ngd_ctrl] [ 21.859318] notifier_call_chain+0xa4/0x230 [ 21.859329] srcu_notifier_call_chain+0x64/0xb8 [ 21.859338] ssr_notify_start+0x40/0x78 [qcom_common] [ 21.859355] rproc_start+0x130/0x230 [ 21.859367] rproc_boot+0x3d4/0x518 ... Move the enablement of interrupts, and the registration of SSR and PDR until after the NGD device has been registered. This could be further refined by moving initialization to the control driver probe and by removing the platform driver model from the picture. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53027 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-07-24 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/ntfs3: fix missing run load for vcn0 in attr_data_get_block_locked() When a compressed or sparse attribute has its clusters frame-aligned, vcn is rounded down to the frame start using cmask, which can result in vcn != vcn0. In this case, vcn and vcn0 may reside in different attribute segments. The code already handles the case where vcn is in a different segment by loading its runs before allocation. However, it fails to load runs for vcn0 when vcn0 resides in a different segment than vcn. This causes run_lookup_entry() to return SPARSE_LCN for vcn0 since its segment was never loaded into the in-memory run list, triggering the WARN_ON(1). Fix this by adding a missing check for vcn0 after the existing vcn segment check. If vcn0 falls outside the current segment range [svcn, evcn1), find and load the attribute segment containing vcn0 before performing the run lookup. The following scenario triggers the bug: attr_data_get_block_locked() vcn = vcn0 & cmask <- vcn != vcn0 after frame alignment load runs for vcn segment <- vcn0 segment not loaded! attr_allocate_clusters() <- allocation succeeds run_lookup_entry(vcn0) <- vcn0 not in run -> SPARSE_LCN WARN_ON(1) <- bug fires here! | ||||
| CVE-2026-52972 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-07-24 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: af_alg - Cap AEAD AD length to 0x80000000 In order to prevent arithmetic overflows when checking the TX buffer size, cap the associated data length to 0x80000000. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43119 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-07-24 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: hci_sync: annotate data-races around hdev->req_status __hci_cmd_sync_sk() sets hdev->req_status under hdev->req_lock: hdev->req_status = HCI_REQ_PEND; However, several other functions read or write hdev->req_status without holding any lock: - hci_send_cmd_sync() reads req_status in hci_cmd_work (workqueue) - hci_cmd_sync_complete() reads/writes from HCI event completion - hci_cmd_sync_cancel() / hci_cmd_sync_cancel_sync() read/write - hci_abort_conn() reads in connection abort path Since __hci_cmd_sync_sk() runs on hdev->req_workqueue while hci_send_cmd_sync() runs on hdev->workqueue, these are different workqueues that can execute concurrently on different CPUs. The plain C accesses constitute a data race. Add READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() annotations on all concurrent accesses to hdev->req_status to prevent potential compiler optimizations that could affect correctness (e.g., load fusing in the wait_event condition or store reordering). | ||||
| CVE-2025-38550 | 2 Debian, Linux | 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel | 2026-07-24 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: mcast: Delay put pmc->idev in mld_del_delrec() pmc->idev is still used in ip6_mc_clear_src(), so as mld_clear_delrec() does, the reference should be put after ip6_mc_clear_src() return. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27390 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-07-24 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: mcast: remove one synchronize_net() barrier in ipv6_mc_down() As discussed in the past (commit 2d3916f31891 ("ipv6: fix skb drops in igmp6_event_query() and igmp6_event_report()")) I think the synchronize_net() call in ipv6_mc_down() is not needed. Under load, synchronize_net() can last between 200 usec and 5 ms. KASAN seems to agree as well. | ||||
| CVE-2022-49662 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-07-24 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: fix lockdep splat in in6_dump_addrs() As reported by syzbot, we should not use rcu_dereference() when rcu_read_lock() is not held. WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 5.19.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 Not tainted net/ipv6/addrconf.c:5175 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by syz-executor326/3617: #0: ffffffff8d5848e8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: netlink_dump+0xae/0xc20 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2223 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 3617 Comm: syz-executor326 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106 in6_dump_addrs+0x12d1/0x1790 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:5175 inet6_dump_addr+0x9c1/0xb50 net/ipv6/addrconf.c:5300 netlink_dump+0x541/0xc20 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2275 __netlink_dump_start+0x647/0x900 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2380 netlink_dump_start include/linux/netlink.h:245 [inline] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x73e/0xc90 net/core/rtnetlink.c:6046 netlink_rcv_skb+0x153/0x420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2501 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x543/0x7f0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345 netlink_sendmsg+0x917/0xe10 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:734 ____sys_sendmsg+0x6eb/0x810 net/socket.c:2492 ___sys_sendmsg+0xf3/0x170 net/socket.c:2546 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2575 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2584 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2582 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x132/0x220 net/socket.c:2582 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 | ||||
| CVE-2026-15719 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2026-07-23 | 5.4 Medium |
| We are aware that exploit code for this is public however we are not aware of any attacks in the wild abusing this flaw. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 152.0.6, Firefox ESR 115.38, Firefox ESR 140.13, and Thunderbird 140.13. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30094 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-07-20 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-30091 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-07-20 | 7.8 High |
| Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-30087 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-07-20 | 7.8 High |
| Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-30063 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-07-20 | 6.7 Medium |
| Windows Distributed File System (DFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-30082 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-07-20 | 7.8 High |
| Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-30078 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-07-20 | 8.8 High |
| Windows Wi-Fi Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-30077 | 1 Microsoft | 24 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 21 more | 2026-07-20 | 8 High |
| Windows OLE Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-30075 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2008 Sp2 | 2026-07-20 | 8 High |
| Windows Link Layer Topology Discovery Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-30074 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2008 Sp2 | 2026-07-20 | 8 High |
| Windows Link Layer Topology Discovery Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||