Export limit exceeded: 10902 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10902 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-28836 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-09-20 | 6.1 Medium |
| A correctness issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.8.8. An attacker with physical access may be able to silently persist an Apple Account on an erased device. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84533 | 1 Apple | 6 Ios And Ipados, Ipados, Iphone Os and 3 more | 2026-09-20 | 5.3 Medium |
| A cryptographic issue was addressed with improved integrity checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, tvOS 27, watchOS 27. An attacker in a privileged network position may be able to modify network traffic. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84606 | 1 Apple | 5 Ios And Ipados, Ipados, Iphone Os and 2 more | 2026-09-20 | 7.5 High |
| A privacy issue was addressed with improved handling of identifiers. This issue is fixed in iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, visionOS 27. An app may be able to identify a user across reinstalls. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86904 | 1 Apple | 4 Ios And Ipados, Ipados, Iphone Os and 1 more | 2026-09-20 | 7.5 High |
| A privacy issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, watchOS 27. An app may be able to track users across apps and websites without permission. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91949 | 1 Freerdp | 1 Freerdp | 2026-09-20 | 9.3 Critical |
| FreeRDP server versions before 3.31.0 contain a protocol negotiation bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to establish RDSTLS connections despite server policy disabling them. Attackers can send incompatible protocol requests, receive negotiation failures, then complete TLS handshake and enter RDSTLS to bypass pre-authentication transport restrictions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93873 | 1 Cotonti | 3 Cotonti, Cotonti Siena, Siena | 2026-09-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cotonti through 1.0.0 fails to validate anti-CSRF tokens in the contact plugin submission handler, allowing attackers to forge messages. Attackers can auto-submit contact forms from attacker-controlled pages to send forged messages attributed to authenticated victims to the administrator inbox. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68532 | 1 Concretecms | 1 Concrete Cms | 2026-09-20 | N/A |
| Concrete CMS 9.0.0 to dashboard group type controller did not validate a CSRF token on its delete action, resulting in cross-site request forgery. A remote unauthenticated attacker could cause an authenticated user with group type management permission to delete a custom group type. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks riodrwn for reporting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61588 | 1 Djust-org | 1 Djust | 2026-09-19 | 6.5 Medium |
| djust provides Phoenix LiveView-style reactive server-side rendering for Django with Rust-powered performance. Prior to version 1.0.7, when a Django `Model` instance is assigned to a public view attribute, djust serialized it to the client with no sensitive-field denylist — sending fields such as `password` (the hash), privilege flags (e.g. `is_staff` / `is_superuser`), tokens, and other PII to the browser. Because exposing model objects to templates is a normal djust pattern, this could leak credentials/PII without the developer realizing the full object crossed the wire. This is fixed in djust 1.0.7. Model serialization applies a secure-by-default sensitive-field denylist (password/hash/token/secret-style fields and known privilege flags are withheld) with an identity-subset fallback. As a workaround, keep `Model` instances on `_private` attributes and expose only the specific fields needed, until patched. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54578 | 1 Midnightbsd | 1 Mport | 2026-09-19 | N/A |
| mport is the MidnightBSD Package Manager. Prior to 2.7.8, mport_verify_package() in libmport/verify.c could continue after MD5File() or SHA256_File() failed and compare an expected checksum with stale data in the hash buffer rather than a newly computed digest. An attacker able to influence an installed file or the conditions that make hashing fail could receive a misleading integrity result or hide a checksum failure. This issue is fixed in version 2.7.8. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84084 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-18 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84077 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-18 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92751 | 1 Yahoo | 1 Cmak | 2026-09-18 | 8.1 High |
| CMAK through 3.0.0.6 fails to install a cross-site request forgery filter, allowing attackers to perform state-changing actions on behalf of authenticated operators. Attackers can craft hidden forms that submit to destructive endpoints like topic deletion and cluster configuration changes, leveraging the operator's HTTP Basic authentication credentials or play-basic-authentication cookie without SameSite protection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93531 | 1 Gedelumbung | 1 Hospitalmanagement | 2026-09-18 | 4.3 Medium |
| A weakness has been identified in gedelumbung HospitalManagement up to c2d45543789a3887067d3915f69d44cfc2cf76a8. This vulnerability affects unknown code. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. This product uses a rolling release model to deliver continuous updates. As a result, specific version information for affected or updated releases is not available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81902 | 1 Concretecms | 1 Concrete Cms | 2026-09-18 | 8.1 High |
| Concrete CMS 9 through 9.5.2 did not validate a CSRF token in the orphaned block removal panel action (removeOrphanedBlocks). A remote attacker could craft a request that, when loaded by an authenticated user holding edit permission on the target page, deleted every block on that page's current version; blocks not aliased to another page or scrapbook entry were also removed from the global Blocks table and their block-type data table, permanently destroying the content. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 7.1 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori from Tenzai for reporting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92565 | 1 Rallly | 1 Rallly | 2026-09-18 | 5.3 Medium |
| Rallly before 4.15.0 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the polls.get tRPC procedure that returns scheduled-event invitee names and email addresses to unauthenticated callers. Attackers can access a poll's urlId from public invite links to retrieve sensitive invitee information regardless of privacy settings. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88875 | 1 Wwbn | 1 Avideo | 2026-09-18 | 4.3 Medium |
| AVideo through revision c3edcc274c389816d434acadac07ee78eaf330c1 (master, 2026-08-23) incompletely sanitizes sensitive user fields in the APIName=video response. Video rows include columns joined from the video owner's user record, and API::get_api_video() calls removeSensitiveUserFields() only when the caller is neither authenticated nor using a valid API secret; it never compares User::getId() with the row's users_id. As a result, any low-privilege authenticated account can request another user's video and receive the owner's email address, account name (user), and isAdmin, canUpload and canStream flags, which are removed for guests and should be returned only to the owner or to callers with a valid API secret. No patched version was available at the time of the advisory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88870 | 1 Wwbn | 1 Avideo | 2026-09-18 | 7.1 High |
| WWBN AVideo through commit c3edcc274c389816d434acadac07ee78eaf330c1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the LoginControl plugin PGP key endpoints that lack CSRF token validation. Attackers can craft malicious pages with image tags pointing to savePublicKey.json.php to replace a logged-in victim's PGP 2FA public key, causing lockout or enabling account takeover if the attacker knows the password. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20313 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ios Xe, Ios Xe Software | 2026-09-18 | 6.7 Medium |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco IOS XE Software of could allow an authenticated, local attacker with level-15 privileges or an unauthenticated attacker with physical access to the device to execute persistent code at boot time and break the chain of trust. These vulnerabilities are due path traversal and improper image integrity validation. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute persistent code on the underlying operating system. Because this allows the attacker to bypass a major security feature of the device, Cisco has raised the Security Impact Rating (SIR) of this advisory from Medium to High. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details ["#details"] section of this advisory. ERP | ||||
| CVE-2026-81920 | 1 Concretecms | 1 Concrete Cms | 2026-09-18 | 4.3 Medium |
| Concrete CMS below 9.5.3 was vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in the dashboard SEO Excluded Words page. The reset() controller action cleared the administrator-configured reserved-word list (concrete.seo.exclude_words) but did not validate the anti-CSRF token that the reset modal emitted, and it did not restrict the request to the POST method. A remote attacker who lured an authenticated user with SEO access to a crafted page could revert the reserved-word list to its default and silently alter future URL-slug generation for pages, files, topics, and other objects created through the Text urlify service, undoing the site's configured SEO slug policy. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks riodrwn for reporting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81919 | 1 Concretecms | 1 Concrete Cms | 2026-09-18 | 4.3 Medium |
| Concrete CMS below 9.5.3 did not validate an anti-CSRF token on the block-arrangement backend endpoint (the arrange() action of Concrete\Controller\Backend\Page\ArrangeBlocks). The action enforced page-edit authorization but performed no token check, and its route accepted any HTTP method, so an attacker could induce a signed-in content editor into loading an attacker-controlled page that auto-submitted a cross-site request and reordered or moved blocks in the draft version of a page the victim was permitted to edit. The default null cookie SameSite configuration let the victim's session cookie accompany the forged request. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 2.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Yonatan Drori from Tenzai for reporting. | ||||