CVE-2026-24332

{"id": "CVE-2026-24332", "cveTags": [{"tags": ["exclusively-hosted-service"], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org"}], "metrics": {"cvssMetricV31": [{"type": "Secondary", "source": "cve@mitre.org", "cvssData": {"scope": "UNCHANGED", "version": "3.1", "baseScore": 4.3, "attackVector": "NETWORK", "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "userInteraction": "NONE", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "LOW"}, "impactScore": 1.4, "exploitabilityScore": 2.8}]}, "published": "2026-01-22T08:16:00.857", "references": [{"url": "https://xmrcat.org/discord-invisibility-bypass", "source": "cve@mitre.org"}], "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis", "weaknesses": [{"type": "Primary", "source": "cve@mitre.org", "description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-204"}]}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "Discord through 2026-01-16 allows gathering information about whether a user's client state is Invisible (and not actually offline) because the response to a WebSocket API request includes the user in the presences array (with \"status\": \"offline\"), whereas offline users are omitted from the presences array. This is arguably inconsistent with the UI description of Invisible as \"You will appear offline.\""}], "lastModified": "2026-01-26T15:04:59.737", "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org"}