Export limit exceeded: 409052 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (166 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-6965 | 3 Apple, Siemens, Sqlite | 9 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 6 more | 2026-10-15 | 7.7 High |
| There exists a vulnerability in SQLite versions before 3.50.2 where the number of aggregate terms could exceed the number of columns available. This could lead to a memory corruption issue. We recommend upgrading to version 3.50.2 or above. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89201 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-14 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in device group or facility names processed during the Bulk Export workflow. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89196 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-14 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in facility names processed during the Bulk Import/Export workflow. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22924 | 8 Debian, Fedoraproject, Haxx and 5 more | 55 Debian Linux, Fedora, Libcurl and 52 more | 2026-10-14 | 3.7 Low |
| libcurl keeps previously used connections in a connection pool for subsequenttransfers to reuse, if one of them matches the setup.Due to errors in the logic, the config matching function did not take 'issuercert' into account and it compared the involved paths *case insensitively*,which could lead to libcurl reusing wrong connections.File paths are, or can be, case sensitive on many systems but not all, and caneven vary depending on used file systems.The comparison also didn't include the 'issuer cert' which a transfer can setto qualify how to verify the server certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89206 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly perform server-side authorization checks for requests to modify the state of scheduled actions. This could allow an authenticated attacker with minimal privileges to retry, stop, or delete scheduled tasks without proper authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89204 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly restrict access to database queries used for subnet management. This could allow an authenticated attacker to read, modify, or delete subnet configurations, leading to unauthorized information disclosure and data manipulation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89199 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly restrict access to sensitive configuration items via specific database queries. This could allow an authenticated attacker to retrieve administrative credentials for various internal systems, leading to unauthorized information disclosure and privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89203 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly restrict access to various database queries, allowing users to retrieve system-wide information that is not intended for their privilege level. This could allow an authenticated attacker to gather sensitive information about the system's infrastructure, including details on all devices, substations, users, and scheduled activities. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89198 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize the filename of firmware files uploaded to the system. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89197 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in the Value field of notification conditions processed during the Notification Profile configuration. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89200 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 6.7 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in the Name and Value fields for custom file labels. This could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89202 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly perform authorization checks for device disconnection requests. This could allow an authenticated attacker with minimal privileges to disconnect active sessions of other users, including administrators, leading to a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89205 | 1 Siemens | 1 Ruggedcom Crossbow | 2026-10-13 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly perform server-side authorization checks for requests to schedule special operations. This could allow an authenticated attacker with minimal privileges to schedule unauthorized operations on devices. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25249 | 2 Fortinet, Siemens | 5 Fortios, Fortisase, Fortiswitchmanager and 2 more | 2026-09-10 | 7.4 High |
| A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, FortiOS 7.0.0 through 7.0.17, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiSwitchManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, FortiSwitchManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.5 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted packets | ||||
| CVE-2026-35535 | 2 Siemens, Sudo Project | 3 Ruggedcom Rst2428p, Sinec Os, Sudo | 2026-08-25 | 7.4 High |
| In Sudo through 1.9.17p2 before 3e474c2, a failure of a setuid, setgid, or setgroups call, during a privilege drop before running the mailer, is not a fatal error and can lead to privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2023-44487 | 33 Akka, Amazon, Apache and 30 more | 378 Http Server, Opensearch Data Prepper, Apisix and 375 more | 2026-08-11 | 7.5 High |
| The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. | ||||
| CVE-2021-42554 | 2 Insyde, Siemens | 31 Insydeh2o, Ruggedcom Ape1808, Ruggedcom Ape1808 Firmware and 28 more | 2026-08-11 | 8.2 High |
| An issue was discovered in Insyde InsydeH2O with Kernel 5.0 before 05.08.42, Kernel 5.1 before 05.16.42, Kernel 5.2 before 05.26.42, Kernel 5.3 before 05.35.42, Kernel 5.4 before 05.42.51, and Kernel 5.5 before 05.50.51. An SMM memory corruption vulnerability in FvbServicesRuntimeDxe allows a possible attacker to write fixed or predictable data to SMRAM. Exploiting this issue could lead to escalating privileges to SMM. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33626 | 2 Insyde, Siemens | 33 Insydeh2o, Ruggedcom Apr1808, Ruggedcom Apr1808 Firmware and 30 more | 2026-08-11 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability exists in SMM (System Management Mode) branch that registers a SWSMI handler that does not sufficiently check or validate the allocated buffer pointer(QWORD values for CommBuffer). This can be used by an attacker to corrupt data in SMRAM memory and even lead to arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2021-33625 | 3 Insyde, Netapp, Siemens | 34 Insydeh2o, Fas\/aff Bios, Ruggedcom Ape1808 and 31 more | 2026-08-11 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Kernel 5.x in Insyde InsydeH2O, affecting HddPassword. Software SMI services that use the Communicate() function of the EFI_SMM_COMMUNICATION_PROTOCOL do not check whether the address of the buffer is valid, which allows use of SMRAM, MMIO, or OS kernel addresses. | ||||
| CVE-2020-5953 | 2 Insyde, Siemens | 33 Insydeh2o, Ruggedcom Ape1808, Ruggedcom Ape1808 Firmware and 30 more | 2026-08-11 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability exists in System Management Interrupt (SWSMI) handler of InsydeH2O UEFI Firmware code located in SWSMI handler that dereferences gRT (EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES) pointer to call a GetVariable service, which is located outside of SMRAM. This can result in code execution in SMM (escalating privilege from ring 0 to ring -2). | ||||