| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The SAP Cloud SDK for Python contains an OAuth2 SSRF vulnerability affecting multi-tenant BTP applications. An attacker who controls the tenant_subdomain parameter can redirect OAuth2 token requests to an attacker-controlled server, causing client credentials to be exfiltrated. |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 10.3 before 19.2.8, 19.3 before 19.3.5, and 19.4 before 19.4.2 that, under certain conditions, could have allowed an authenticated user to perform server-side request forgery and reach internal network resources due to a time-of-check to time-of-use race condition in URL validation during repository import operations. |
| Malcolm file-upload component ships the upstream FilePond PHP server (pqina/filepond-server-php) largely unmodified: Dockerfile copies all upstream *.php files and Malcolm only overwrites config.php and submit.php. Upstream index.php exposes a fetch API route that instructs the server to download an arbitrary URL with curl (including FOLLOWLOCATION) and, for HEAD requests, stores the fetched response body in the upload container's transfer directory and returns the transfer ID to the caller, enabling full readback of the fetched content. |
| ColdFusion is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| InvoiceShelf is an open-source web & mobile app that helps track expenses, payments and create professional invoices and estimates. Prior to version 2.4.0, InvoiceShelf's PDFConfigurationRequest.php validates the owner-controlled gotenberg_host setting only as a syntactically valid URL. GotenbergPDFDriver::loadView later sends a multipart HTTP request containing rendered invoice, estimate, or payment HTML as document.html to that host without rejecting private, loopback, link-local, or reserved addresses. An owner can use PDF generation to reach internal services or cloud metadata endpoints, and a configured external host receives customer names, addresses, line items, totals, and company identifiers from subsequent PDF renders. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0. |
| Joomla Extension - svenbluege.de - Server-side request forgery in the Google Photos picker in Event Gallery extension < 6.6.0 - The Google Photos picker of the back-end upload page fetches the thumbnails of the picked images through the server, with the OAuth access token of the Google Photos account. The task took the address to fetch from the request without checking it and asked for no form token. A prepared page on another web site could therefore make the server send the access token of the account to any address, or fetch addresses inside the server's network, in the name of a logged in administrator; a back-end user with the permission "Manage" could do the same directly. The token is valid for about an hour and reaches what the picker session of the account reaches. |
| Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over an adjacent network. |
| Razorpay IFSC Ruby gem through 2.0.62 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to redirect API requests by supplying a crafted IFSC code to IFSC.find or IFSC#get. Attackers can submit network-path references or absolute URIs that URI.join resolves as a new host, sending GET requests to internal or attacker-chosen hosts and returning parsed response fields. |
| Company Research Agent through 2.2.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger outbound requests by injecting unescaped ReportLab paragraph markup into the /generate-pdf endpoint. Attackers can embed inline img elements in report_content to make the server fetch internal or external hosts, leaking image responses in returned PDFs and probing reachability. |
| The curl URL parser wrongly accepts percent-encoded URL separators like '/'when decoding the host name part of a URL, making it a *different* URL usingthe wrong host name when it is later retrieved.For example, a URL like `http://example.com%2F127.0.0.1/`, would be allowed bythe parser and get transposed into `http://example.com/127.0.0.1/`. This flawcan be used to circumvent filters, checks and more. |
| A flaw was found in Quay. An authenticated repository administrator could bypass the hostname blacklist in webhook notifications, leading to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. This allows the Quay application to be tricked into sending requests to internal network resources, such as cloud metadata services or other services within the cluster. Consequently, this could lead to the disclosure of sensitive information from these internal services. |
| When OpenID sign-in is enabled, Gitea accepts a user-supplied OpenID URL and performs discovery requests without validating the destination against internal network addresses. An unauthenticated remote attacker can cause the server to contact loopback or private-network HTTP services. This can expose internal service behavior and enable interaction with resources that are not directly reachable by the attacker. |
| Finsys Dockhand before 1.0.45 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the ipCategory() function in src/lib/server/url-safety.ts, which fails to check NAT64, 6to4, and Teredo IPv6 transition ranges. Authenticated attackers can embed loopback, cloud metadata, or private IPv4 addresses in transition IPv6 literals within notification, backup, template, registry, git, or secret provider URLs to reach internal services. |
| Kavita 0.9.0 through 0.9.1.4 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated users to bypass the SSRF blocklist through DNS rebinding or HTTPS redirects. Attackers can submit a URL to POST /api/Cbl/upload-cbl-file whose host rebinds or redirects to internal addresses after validation, enabling blind internal port and service probing. |
| Mealie 3.26.0 through 3.28.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the OpenID Connect avatar fetch that ignores ports when allowlisting the identity provider hostname. Authenticated OIDC users who control their picture URL can make the server send GET requests to arbitrary ports on the provider's internal address on each login. |
| ColdFusion is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| ColdFusion is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network. |
| Portkey AI Gateway 1.14.0 through 1.15.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to reach loopback and Docker host services because isValidCustomHost trusts localhost-style hosts when TRUSTED_CUSTOM_HOSTS is unset. Attackers can send /v1 requests with a crafted x-portkey-custom-host header, such as via the ollama provider, to make the gateway call internal services and return their responses. |
| When OpenID sign-in is enabled, Gitea processes unauthenticated assertion parameters and sends an HTTP POST request to the caller-supplied OpenID provider endpoint during verification. An attacker controls the destination and much of the form body, allowing interaction with internal HTTP services reachable from the Gitea server. The response is not returned to the attacker, so the issue is blind SSRF; its impact depends on the services and network addresses the server can reach. |
