Total
64 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-41854 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-06-15 | N/A | 4.2 MEDIUM |
| Due to incorrect host parsing, applications that rely on UriComponentsBuilder to parse and validate an externally provided URL string may be exposed to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack. Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41838 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-06-11 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| IDs for WebSocket sessions in the spring-websocket module are not cryptographically unpredictable, which may be possible to exploit in combination with inadequate authorization rules. Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41844 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-06-11 | N/A | 4.2 MEDIUM |
| A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application which configures a mapping for "/**" where the view name is not explicitly specified allows an attacker to craft a link resulting in a 302 redirect to an arbitrary external host via the redirect: prefix. Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41845 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-06-11 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| Due to incorrect escaping, the use of JavaScriptUtils.javaScriptEscape() may lead to JavaScript code injection in the browser, potentially resulting in a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41846 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-06-11 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Spring MVC applications which accept user-supplied values in the cssClass, cssErrorClass, or cssStyle attributes of JSP form tags allow arbitrary HTML/JavaScript code injection, potentially resulting in a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41847 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-06-11 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| Spring WebFlux applications may be vulnerable to a security bypass when using the Kotlin Router DSL. Affected versions: Spring Framework 5.3.0 through 5.3.48. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41848 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-06-11 | N/A | 3.7 LOW |
| Applications may be vulnerable to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) attack if an attacker is able to provide a pattern which is then directly or indirectly supplied to one of the following methods in AntPathMatcher: match(String pattern, String path), matchStart(String pattern, String path), extractUriTemplateVariables(String pattern, String path). Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41852 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-06-11 | N/A | 3.7 LOW |
| A vulnerability in Spring Expression Language (SpEL) evaluation logic allows for arbitrary zero-argument method invocation, even within restricted or read-only contexts, which may allow an attacker to invoke unintended application logic. Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41840 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-06-09 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Spring WebFlux applications are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) attacks when processing multipart requests. Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41841 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-06-09 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to Information Disclosure attacks when resolving static resources. Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41842 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-06-09 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) attacks when resolving static resources. Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41843 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-06-09 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to Path Traversal attacks when resolving static resources. Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41849 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-06-09 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An integer overflow vulnerability exists in the evaluation logic of the Spring Expression Language (SpEL). An attacker can exploit this by supplying a specially crafted SpEL expression that triggers excessive resource consumption, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). Affected versions: Spring Framework 5.3.0 through 5.3.48. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41850 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-06-09 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Applications that evaluate user-supplied Spring Expression Language (SpEL) expressions are vulnerable to an Algorithmic Denial of Service (DoS). By providing a specially crafted expression, an attacker can trigger excessive resource consumption during evaluation, leading to application degradation or unavailability. Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41851 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-06-09 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Applications which accept user-supplied Spring Expression Language (SpEL) expressions may be vulnerable to a Denial of Service (DoS) attack if the evaluation of a SpEL expression triggers unbounded cache growth. Affected versions: Spring Framework 7.0.0 through 7.0.7; 6.2.0 through 6.2.18; 6.1.0 through 6.1.27; 5.3.0 through 5.3.48. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0225 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 2 Spring Framework, Spring Framework | 2026-05-13 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| When processing user provided XML documents, the Spring Framework 4.0.0 to 4.0.4, 3.0.0 to 3.2.8, and possibly earlier unsupported versions did not disable by default the resolution of URI references in a DTD declaration. This enabled an XXE attack. | |||||
| CVE-2015-5211 | 2 Debian, Vmware | 2 Debian Linux, Spring Framework | 2026-05-13 | 9.3 HIGH | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| Under some situations, the Spring Framework 4.2.0 to 4.2.1, 4.0.0 to 4.1.7, 3.2.0 to 3.2.14 and older unsupported versions is vulnerable to a Reflected File Download (RFD) attack. The attack involves a malicious user crafting a URL with a batch script extension that results in the response being downloaded rather than rendered and also includes some input reflected in the response. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5007 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 3 Spring Framework, Spring Framework, Spring Security | 2026-05-13 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Both Spring Security 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.0 and the Spring Framework 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x, 4.2.x rely on URL pattern mappings for authorization and for mapping requests to controllers respectively. Differences in the strictness of the pattern matching mechanisms, for example with regards to space trimming in path segments, can lead Spring Security to not recognize certain paths as not protected that are in fact mapped to Spring MVC controllers that should be protected. The problem is compounded by the fact that the Spring Framework provides richer features with regards to pattern matching as well as by the fact that pattern matching in each Spring Security and the Spring Framework can easily be customized creating additional differences. | |||||
| CVE-2014-3625 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 2 Spring Framework, Spring Framework | 2026-05-06 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in Pivotal Spring Framework 3.0.4 through 3.2.x before 3.2.12, 4.0.x before 4.0.8, and 4.1.x before 4.1.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors, related to static resource handling. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9878 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 2 Spring Framework, Spring Framework | 2026-05-06 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal Spring Framework before 3.2.18, 4.2.x before 4.2.9, and 4.3.x before 4.3.5. Paths provided to the ResourceServlet were not properly sanitized and as a result exposed to directory traversal attacks. | |||||