Total
112 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-39077 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Guardium, Linux Kernel | 2025-07-23 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.5, 10.6, 11.0, 11.1, 11.2, 11.3, and 11.4 stores user credentials in plain clear text which can be read by a local privileged user. IBM X-Force ID: 215587. | |||||
| CVE-2025-3440 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-06-20 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.5 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows a privileged user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | |||||
| CVE-2025-25023 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-06-20 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 11.4 and 12.1 could allow a privileged user to read any file on the system due to incorrect privilege assignment. | |||||
| CVE-2023-47717 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-06-13 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 12.0 could allow a privileged user to perform unauthorized actions that could lead to a denial of service. IBM X-Force ID: 271690. | |||||
| CVE-2025-25029 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-06-04 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 12.0 could allow a privileged user to download any file on the system due to improper escaping of input. | |||||
| CVE-2025-25026 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-06-04 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 12.0 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information due to an incorrect authentication check. | |||||
| CVE-2025-25025 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-06-04 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 12.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1122 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 8.2, 9.0, and 10.0 contains a vulnerability that could allow a local attacker with CLI access to inject arbitrary commands which would be executed as root. IBM X-Force ID: 121174. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1595 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 Database Activity Monitor could allow a local attacker to obtain highly sensitive information via unspecified vectors. IBM X-Force ID: 132549. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1256 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 124678 | |||||
| CVE-2017-1271 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 9.0, 9.1, and 9.5 supports interaction between multiple actors and allows those actors to negotiate which algorithm should be used as a protection mechanism such as encryption or authentication, but it does not select the strongest algorithm that is available to both parties. IBM X-Force ID: 124746. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1600 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 Database Activity Monitor is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 132613. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1264 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 does not prove or insufficiently proves that the actors identity is correct which can lead to exposure of resources or functionality to unintended actors. IBM X-Force ID: 124739. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1596 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 Database Activity Monitor could allow a local attacker to obtain highly sensitive information via unspecified vectors. IBM X-Force ID: 132550. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1258 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.1 does not perform an authentication check for a critical resource or functionality allowing anonymous users access to protected areas. IBM X-Force ID: 124685 | |||||
| CVE-2017-1262 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using specially-crafted URL to cause the server to return a split response, once the URL is clicked. This would allow the attacker to perform further attacks, such as Web cache poisoning, cross-site scripting, and possibly obtain sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 124737. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1253 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 124633. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1261 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 stores potentially sensitive information in log files that could be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 124736. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1267 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.1 processes patches, image backups and other updates without sufficiently verifying the origin and integrity of the code. IBM X-Force ID: 124742. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1270 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 does not renew a session variable after a successful authentication which could lead to session fixation/hijacking vulnerability. This could force a user to utilize a cookie that may be known to an attacker. IBM X-Force ID: 124745. | |||||