Total
181 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-12085 | 8 Almalinux, Archlinux, Gentoo and 5 more | 22 Almalinux, Arch Linux, Linux and 19 more | 2026-07-26 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in rsync which could be triggered when rsync compares file checksums. This flaw allows an attacker to manipulate the checksum length (s2length) to cause a comparison between a checksum and uninitialized memory and leak one byte of uninitialized stack data at a time. | |||||
| CVE-2025-14512 | 2 Gnome, Redhat | 3 Glib, Enterprise Linux, Openshift | 2026-07-13 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in glib. This vulnerability allows a heap buffer overflow and denial-of-service (DoS) via an integer overflow in GLib's GIO (GLib Input/Output) escape_byte_string() function when processing malicious file or remote filesystem attribute values. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45777 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 3 Grub2, Enterprise Linux, Openshift | 2026-06-29 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in grub2. The calculation of the translation buffer when reading a language .mo file in grub_gettext_getstr_from_position() may overflow, leading to a Out-of-bound write. This issue can be leveraged by an attacker to overwrite grub2's sensitive heap data, eventually leading to the circumvention of secure boot protections. | |||||
| CVE-2026-35092 | 2 Corosync, Redhat | 3 Corosync, Enterprise Linux, Openshift | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in Corosync. An integer overflow vulnerability in Corosync's join message sanity validation allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to send crafted User Datagram Protocol (UDP) packets. This can cause the service to crash, leading to a denial of service. This vulnerability specifically affects Corosync deployments configured to use totemudp/totemudpu mode. | |||||
| CVE-2026-35091 | 2 Corosync, Redhat | 3 Corosync, Enterprise Linux, Openshift | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in Corosync. A remote unauthenticated attacker can exploit a wrong return value vulnerability in the Corosync membership commit token sanity check by sending a specially crafted User Datagram Protocol (UDP) packet. This can lead to an out-of-bounds read, causing a denial of service (DoS) and potentially disclosing limited memory contents | |||||
| CVE-2026-22549 | 3 F5, Kubernetes, Redhat | 3 Big-ip Container Ingress Services, Kubernetes, Openshift | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability exists in F5 BIG-IP Container Ingress Services that may allow excessive permissions to read cluster secrets. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | |||||
| CVE-2025-36187 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Knowledge Catalog, Openshift | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Knowledge Catalog Standard Cartridge 5.0.0, 5.0.1, 5.0.2, 5.0.3, 5.1, 5.1.1, 5,1.2, 5.1.3, 5.2.0, 5.2.1 stores potentially sensitive information in log files that could be read by a local privileged user. | |||||
| CVE-2024-51465 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 App Connect Enterprise Certified Container, Openshift | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| IBM App Connect Enterprise Certified Container 11.4, 11.5, 11.6, 12.0, 12.1, 12.2, and 12.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system by sending a specially crafted request. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1485 | 2 Devfile, Redhat | 3 Registry-support, Openshift, Openshift Developer Tools And Services | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in the decompression function of registry-support. This issue can be triggered if an unauthenticated remote attacker tricks a user into parsing a devfile which uses the `parent` or `plugin` keywords. This could download a malicious archive and cause the cleanup process to overwrite or delete files outside of the archive, which should not be allowed. | |||||
| CVE-2023-44487 | 33 Akka, Amazon, Apache and 30 more | 324 Http Server, Opensearch Data Prepper, Apisix and 321 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. | |||||
| CVE-2023-43058 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Openshift | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 23.0.9 is vulnerable to privilege escalation that affects ownership of projects. IBM X-Force ID: 247527. | |||||
| CVE-2023-40694 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Watson Cp4d Data Stores, Openshift | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| IBM Watson CP4D Data Stores 4.0.0 through 4.8.4 stores potentially sensitive information in log files that could be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 264838. | |||||
| CVE-2023-40370 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 4 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Windows and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.7 LOW |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.1 runtime is vulnerable to information disclosure of script content if the remote REST request computer policy is enabled. IBM X-Force ID: 263470. | |||||
| CVE-2023-38734 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 3 Robotic Process Automation, Windows, Openshift | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.1 and 23.0.0 through 23.0.1 is vulnerable to incorrect privilege assignment when importing users from an LDAP directory. IBM X-Force ID: 262481. | |||||
| CVE-2023-38733 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 3 Robotic Process Automation, Windows, Openshift | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.1 and 23.0.0 through 23.0.1 server could allow an authenticated user to view sensitive information from installation logs. IBM X-Force Id: 262293. | |||||
| CVE-2023-38732 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 4 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Windows and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 through 21.0.7 server could allow an authenticated user to view sensitive information from application logs. IBM X-Force ID: 262289. | |||||
| CVE-2023-35901 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 2.7 LOW |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.6 and 23.0.0 through 23.0.6 is vulnerable to client side validation bypass which could allow invalid changes or values in some fields. IBM X-Force ID: 259380. | |||||
| CVE-2023-35900 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.4 and 23.0.0 through 23.0.5 is vulnerable to disclosing server version information which may be used to determine software vulnerabilities at the operating system level. IBM X-Force ID: 259368. | |||||
| CVE-2023-27540 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 3 Cloud Pak For Data, Watson Cp4d Data Stores, Openshift | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM Watson CP4D Data Stores 4.6.0 does not properly allocate resources without limits or throttling which could allow a remote attacker with information specific to the system to cause a denial of service. IBM X-Force ID: 248924. | |||||
| CVE-2023-23468 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Robotic Process Automation, Openshift | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.1 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 21.0.1 through 21.0.7.3 and 23.0.0 through 23.0.3 is vulnerable to insufficient security configuration which may allow creation of namespaces within a cluster. IBM X-Force ID: 244500. | |||||