Total
347759 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-5448 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| X.509 date buffer overflow in wolfSSL_X509_notAfter / wolfSSL_X509_notBefore. A buffer overflow may occur when parsing date fields from a crafted X.509 certificate via the compatibility layer API. This is only triggered when calling these two APIs directly from an application, and does not affect TLS or certificate verify operations in wolfSSL. | |||||
| CVE-2026-5188 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| An integer underflow issue exists in wolfSSL when parsing the Subject Alternative Name (SAN) extension of X.509 certificates. A malformed certificate can specify an entry length larger than the enclosing sequence, causing the internal length counter to wrap during parsing. This results in incorrect handling of certificate data. The issue is limited to configurations using the original ASN.1 parsing implementation which is off by default. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40182 | 1 Opentelemetry | 1 Opentelemetry | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| OpenTelemetry dotnet is a dotnet telemetry framework. From 1.13.1 to before 1.15.2, When exporting telemetry to a back-end/collector over gRPC or HTTP using OpenTelemetry Protocol format (OTLP), if the request results in a unsuccessful request (i.e. HTTP 4xx or 5xx), the response is read into memory with no upper-bound on the number of bytes consumed. This could cause memory exhaustion in the consuming application if the configured back-end/collector endpoint is attacker-controlled (or a network attacker can MitM the connection) and an extremely large body is returned by the response. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.15.2. | |||||
| CVE-2026-5466 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| wolfSSL's ECCSI signature verifier `wc_VerifyEccsiHash` decodes the `r` and `s` scalars from the signature blob via `mp_read_unsigned_bin` with no check that they lie in `[1, q-1]`. A crafted forged signature could verify against any message for any identity, using only publicly-known constants. | |||||
| CVE-2026-5479 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| In wolfSSL's EVP layer, the ChaCha20-Poly1305 AEAD decryption path in wolfSSL_EVP_CipherFinal (and related EVP cipher finalization functions) fails to verify the authentication tag before returning plaintext to the caller. When an application uses the EVP API to perform ChaCha20-Poly1305 decryption, the implementation computes or accepts the tag but does not compare it against the expected value. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41359 | 1 Openclaw | 1 Openclaw | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| OpenClaw before 2026.3.28 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability allowing authenticated operators with write permissions to access admin-class Telegram configuration and cron persistence settings via the send endpoint. Attackers with operator.write credentials can exploit insufficient access controls to reach sensitive administrative functionality and modify persistence mechanisms. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41873 | 1 Apache | 1 Pony Mail | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') vulnerability in Pony Mail leading to admin account takeover. This issue affects all versions of the Lua implementation of Pony Mail. There is a Python implementation under development under the name "Pony Mail Foal" that is not affected by this issue, but hasn't been released yet. As the Lua implementation of this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fixes this issue. Users are recommended to find an alternative or restrict access to the instance to trusted users. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. | |||||
| CVE-2026-3307 | 1 Github | 1 Enterprise Server | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 2.7 LOW |
| An authorization bypass vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an attacker with admin access on one repository to modify the secret scanning push protection delegated bypass reviewer list on another repository by manipulating the owner_id parameter in the request body. Authorization was verified against the repository in the URL, but the action was applied to a different repository specified in the request body. The impact is limited to assigning existing trusted users as bypass reviewers; it does not allow adding arbitrary external users. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.21 and was fixed in versions 3.14.25, 3.15.20, 3.16.16, 3.17.13, 3.18.7, 3.19.4 and 3.20.1. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. | |||||
| CVE-2026-4296 | 1 Github | 1 Enterprise Server | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| An incorrect regular expression vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an attacker to bypass OAuth redirect URI validation. An attacker with knowledge of a first-party OAuth application's registered callback URL could craft a malicious authorization link that, when clicked by a victim, would redirect the OAuth authorization code to an attacker-controlled domain. This could allow the attacker to gain unauthorized access to the victim's account with the scopes granted to the OAuth application. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.21 and was fixed in versions 3.20.1, 3.19.5, 3.18.8, 3.17.14, 3.16.17, 3.15.21, 3.14.26. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. | |||||
| CVE-2026-4821 | 1 Github | 1 Enterprise Server | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| An improper neutralization of special elements vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an authenticated Management Console administrator to execute arbitrary OS commands via shell metacharacter injection in proxy configuration fields such as http_proxy. Exploitation of this vulnerability required access to the GitHub Enterprise Server instance and administrator privileges to the Management Console. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.21 and was fixed in versions 3.20.1, 3.19.5, 3.18.8, 3.17.14, 3.16.17, 3.15.21, 3.14.26. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. | |||||
| CVE-2026-5512 | 1 Github | 1 Enterprise Server | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An improper authorization vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an authenticated attacker to determine the names of private repositories by their numeric ID. The mobile upload policy API endpoint did not perform an early authorization check, and validation error messages included the full repository name for repositories the caller did not have access to. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.21 and was fixed in versions 3.20.1, 3.19.5, 3.18.8, 3.17.14, 3.16.17, 3.15.21, and 3.14.26. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. | |||||
| CVE-2026-5845 | 1 Github | 1 Enterprise Server | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| An improper authorization vulnerability in scoped user-to-server (ghu_) token authorization in GitHub Enterprise Server allows an authenticated attacker to access private repositories outside the intended installation scope, which can include write operations, via an authorization fallback that treated a revoked/deleted installation as a global installation context, which could be chained with token revocation timing and SSH push attribution to obtain and reuse a victim-scoped token. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.21 and was fixed in versions 3.20.1, 3.19.5, 3.18.8, 3.17.14, 3.16.17, 3.15.21, and 3.14.26. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. | |||||
| CVE-2025-14359 | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH | ||
| Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in brandexponents Oshine allows PHP Local File Inclusion. This issue affects Oshine: from n/a before 7.3.0. | |||||
| CVE-2025-14821 | 2 Libssh, Redhat | 2 Libssh, Hardened Images | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in libssh. This vulnerability allows local man-in-the-middle attacks, security downgrades of SSH (Secure Shell) connections, and manipulation of trusted host information, posing a significant risk to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of SSH communications via an insecure default configuration on Windows systems where the library automatically loads configuration files from the C:\etc directory, which can be created and modified by unprivileged local users. | |||||
| CVE-2024-46382 | 1 Linlinjava | 1 Litemall | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A SQL injection vulnerability in linlinjava litemall 1.8.0 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the goodsId, goodsSn, and name parameters in AdminOrderController.java. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40786 | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Long Watch Studio MyRewards woorewards allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects MyRewards: from n/a through <= 5.7.3. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40784 | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH | ||
| Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Mahmudul Hasan Arif FluentBoards fluent-boards allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects FluentBoards: from n/a through <= 1.91.2. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40778 | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Majestic Support Majestic Support majestic-support allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Majestic Support: from n/a through <= 1.1.2. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40764 | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Syed Balkhi Contact Form by WPForms wpforms-lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Contact Form by WPForms: from n/a through <= 1.10.0.2. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40742 | 2026-04-29 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Nelio Software Nelio AB Testing nelio-ab-testing allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Nelio AB Testing: from n/a through <= 8.2.8. | |||||