Total
231 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2011-0534 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.30 does not enforce the maxHttpHeaderSize limit for requests involving the NIO HTTP connector, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (OutOfMemoryError) via a crafted request. | |||||
| CVE-2010-3718 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 1.2 LOW | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, 6.0.x, and 5.5.x, when running within a SecurityManager, does not make the ServletContext attribute read-only, which allows local web applications to read or write files outside of the intended working directory, as demonstrated using a directory traversal attack. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4322 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat before 6.0.39, 7.x before 7.0.50, and 8.x before 8.0.0-RC10 processes chunked transfer coding without properly handling (1) a large total amount of chunked data or (2) whitespace characters in an HTTP header value within a trailer field, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by streaming data. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-3544. | |||||
| CVE-2013-6357 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Manager application in Apache Tomcat 5.5.25 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that manipulate application deployment via the POST method, as demonstrated by a /manager/html/undeploy?path= URI. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this report, stating that "the Apache Tomcat Security team has not accepted any reports of CSRF attacks against the Manager application ... as they require a reckless system administrator. | |||||
| CVE-2012-4431 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| org/apache/catalina/filters/CsrfPreventionFilter.java in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.36 and 7.x before 7.0.32 allows remote attackers to bypass the cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection mechanism via a request that lacks a session identifier. | |||||
| CVE-2013-2067 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| java/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/FormAuthenticator.java in the form authentication feature in Apache Tomcat 6.0.21 through 6.0.36 and 7.x before 7.0.33 does not properly handle the relationships between authentication requirements and sessions, which allows remote attackers to inject a request into a session by sending this request during completion of the login form, a variant of a session fixation attack. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5887 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.36, 6.x before 6.0.36, and 7.x before 7.0.30 does not properly check for stale nonce values in conjunction with enforcement of proper credentials, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by sniffing the network for valid requests. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4286 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat before 6.0.39, 7.x before 7.0.47, and 8.x before 8.0.0-RC3, when an HTTP connector or AJP connector is used, does not properly handle certain inconsistent HTTP request headers, which allows remote attackers to trigger incorrect identification of a request's length and conduct request-smuggling attacks via (1) multiple Content-Length headers or (2) a Content-Length header and a "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" header. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2005-2090. | |||||
| CVE-2011-1582 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 7.0.12 and 7.0.13 processes the first request to a servlet without following security constraints that have been configured through annotations, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via HTTP requests. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2011-1088, CVE-2011-1183, and CVE-2011-1419. | |||||
| CVE-2011-2204 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 1.9 LOW | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.17, when the MemoryUserDatabase is used, creates log entries containing passwords upon encountering errors in JMX user creation, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading a log file. | |||||
| CVE-2009-2693 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.28 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.20 allows remote attackers to create or overwrite arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in an entry in a WAR file, as demonstrated by a ../../bin/catalina.bat entry. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5568 | 2 Apache, Opensuse | 2 Tomcat, Opensuse | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat through 7.0.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) via partial HTTP requests, as demonstrated by Slowloris. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0346 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 7.x uses world-readable permissions for the log directory and its files, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive information by reading a file. NOTE: One Tomcat distributor has stated "The tomcat log directory does not contain any sensitive information." | |||||
| CVE-2010-4172 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Manager application in Apache Tomcat 6.0.12 through 6.0.29 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.4 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) orderBy or (2) sort parameter to sessionsList.jsp, or unspecified input to (3) sessionDetail.jsp or (4) java/org/apache/catalina/manager/JspHelper.java, related to use of untrusted web applications. | |||||
| CVE-2010-4312 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 6.4 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The default configuration of Apache Tomcat 6.x does not include the HTTPOnly flag in a Set-Cookie header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to hijack a session via script access to a cookie. | |||||
| CVE-2011-5063 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 does not check realm values, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by leveraging the availability of a protection space with weaker authentication or authorization requirements, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. | |||||
| CVE-2012-3544 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.37 and 7.x before 7.0.30 does not properly handle chunk extensions in chunked transfer coding, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by streaming data. | |||||
| CVE-2011-5064 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| DigestAuthenticator.java in the HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 uses Catalina as the hard-coded server secret (aka private key), which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of this string, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. | |||||
| CVE-2009-2901 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The autodeployment process in Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.28 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.20, when autoDeploy is enabled, deploys appBase files that remain from a failed undeploy, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended authentication requirements via HTTP requests. | |||||
| CVE-2009-2902 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2025-04-11 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in Apache Tomcat 5.5.0 through 5.5.28 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.20 allows remote attackers to delete work-directory files via directory traversal sequences in a WAR filename, as demonstrated by the ...war filename. | |||||