Filtered by vendor Debian
Subscribe
Total
10214 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-2533 | 3 Debian, Python, Python Imaging Project | 3 Debian Linux, Pillow, Python Imaging | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Buffer overflow in the ImagingPcdDecode function in PcdDecode.c in Pillow before 3.1.1 and Python Imaging Library (PIL) 1.1.7 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted PhotoCD file. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2518 | 7 Debian, Freebsd, Netapp and 4 more | 18 Debian Linux, Freebsd, Clustered Data Ontap and 15 more | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The MATCH_ASSOC function in NTP before version 4.2.8p9 and 4.3.x before 4.3.92 allows remote attackers to cause an out-of-bounds reference via an addpeer request with a large hmode value. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2511 | 2 Debian, Websvn | 2 Debian Linux, Websvn | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in WebSVN 2.3.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the path parameter to log.php. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2510 | 3 Beanshell, Canonical, Debian | 3 Beanshell, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| BeanShell (bsh) before 2.0b6, when included on the classpath by an application that uses Java serialization or XStream, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted serialized data, related to XThis.Handler. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2391 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Qemu | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Qemu | 2026-06-17 | 2.1 LOW | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| The ohci_bus_start function in the USB OHCI emulation support (hw/usb/hcd-ohci.c) in QEMU allows local guest OS administrators to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and QEMU process crash) via vectors related to multiple eof_timers. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2385 | 2 Debian, Kamailio | 2 Debian Linux, Kamailio | 2026-06-17 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the encode_msg function in encode_msg.c in the SEAS module in Kamailio (formerly OpenSER and SER) before 4.3.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and process crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a large SIP packet. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2381 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Opensuse and 2 more | 10 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Opensuse and 7 more | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Perl might allow context-dependent attackers to bypass the taint protection mechanism in a child process via duplicate environment variables in envp. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2380 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.1 LOW |
| An information leak exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent to the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A user could be convinced to enter a particular string which would then get converted incorrectly and could lead to a potential out-of-bounds read. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2378 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol Pidgin. Specially crafted data sent via the server could potentially result in a buffer overflow, potentially resulting in memory corruption. A malicious server or an unfiltered malicious user can send negative length values to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2377 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent by the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds write of one byte. A malicious server can send a negative content-length in response to a HTTP request triggering the vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2376 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent from the server could potentially result in arbitrary code execution. A malicious server or an attacker who intercepts the network traffic can send an invalid size for a packet which will trigger a buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2375 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An exploitable out-of-bounds read exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT contact information sent from the server can result in memory disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2374 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| An exploitable memory corruption vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT MultiMX message sent via the server can result in an out-of-bounds write leading to memory disclosure and code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2373 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A malicious server or user can send an invalid mood to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2372 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2026-06-17 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An information leak exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A malicious user, server, or man-in-the-middle attacker can send an invalid size for a file transfer which will trigger an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. This could result in a denial of service or copy data from memory to the file, resulting in an information leak if the file is sent to another user. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2371 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could cause memory corruption resulting in code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2370 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent from the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A malicious server or man-in-the-middle attacker can send invalid data to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2369 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could potentially result in a denial of service vulnerability. A malicious server can send a packet starting with a NULL byte triggering the vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2368 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2026-06-17 | 7.5 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| Multiple memory corruption vulnerabilities exist in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could result in multiple buffer overflows, potentially resulting in code execution or memory disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2367 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pidgin | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pidgin | 2026-06-17 | 3.5 LOW | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An information leak exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A malicious user, server, or man-in-the-middle can send an invalid size for an avatar which will trigger an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. This could result in a denial of service or copy data from memory to the file, resulting in an information leak if the avatar is sent to another user. | |||||