Filtered by vendor Foxit
Subscribe
Total
358 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-66519 | 1 Foxit | 1 Pdf Editor Cloud | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in pdfonline.foxit.com within the Layer Import functionality. A crafted payload can be injected into the “Create new Layer” field during layer import and is later rendered into the DOM without proper sanitization. As a result, the injected script executes when the Layers panel is accessed. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66502 | 1 Foxit | 1 Pdf Editor Cloud | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in pdfonline.foxit.com within the Page Templates feature. A crafted payload can be stored as the template name, which is later rendered into the DOM without proper sanitization. As a result, the injected script executes each time the affected PDF is loaded. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66501 | 1 Foxit | 1 Pdf Editor Cloud | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in pdfonline.foxit.com within the Predefined Text feature of the Foxit eSign section. A crafted payload can be stored via the Identity “First Name” field, which is later rendered into the DOM without proper sanitization. As a result, the injected script may execute when predefined text is used or when viewing document properties. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66500 | 1 Foxit | 1 Pdf Editor Cloud | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in webplugins.foxit.com. A postMessage handler fails to validate the message origin and directly assigns externalPath to a script source, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript when a crafted postMessage is received. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66499 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Macos, Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the PDF parsing of Foxit PDF Reader when processing specially crafted JBIG2 data. An integer overflow in the calculation of the image buffer size may occur, potentially allowing a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66498 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the 3D annotation handling of Foxit PDF Reader due to insufficient bounds checking when parsing U3D data. When opening a PDF file containing malformed or specially crafted PRC content, out-of-bounds memory access may occur, resulting in memory corruption. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66497 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Macos, Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the 3D annotation handling of Foxit PDF Reader due to insufficient bounds checking when parsing PRC data. When opening a PDF file containing malformed or specially crafted PRC content, out-of-bounds memory access may occur, resulting in memory corruption. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66496 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the 3D annotation handling of Foxit PDF Reader due to insufficient bounds checking when parsing PRC data. When opening a PDF file containing malformed or specially crafted PRC content, out-of-bounds memory access may occur, resulting in memory corruption. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66495 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Macos, Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A use-after-free vulnerability exists in the annotation handling of Foxit PDF Reader before 2025.2.1, 14.0.1, and 13.2.1 on Windows and MacOS. When opening a PDF containing specially crafted JavaScript, a pointer to memory that has already been freed may be accessed or dereferenced, potentially allowing a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66494 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A use-after-free vulnerability exists in the PDF file parsing of Foxit PDF Reader before 2025.2.1, 14.0.1, and 13.2.1 on Windows. A PDF object managed by multiple parent objects could be freed while still being referenced, potentially allowing a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66493 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A use-after-free vulnerability exists in the AcroForm handling of Foxit PDF Reader and Foxit PDF Editor before 2025.2.1,14.0.1 and 13.2.1 on Windows . When opening a PDF containing specially crafted JavaScript, a pointer to memory that has already been freed may be accessed or dereferenced, potentially allowing a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2025-59803 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Macos, Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Foxit PDF Editor and Reader before 2025.2.1 allow signature spoofing via triggers. An attacker can embed triggers (e.g., JavaScript) in a PDF document that execute during the signing process. When a signer reviews the document, the content appears normal. However, once the signature is applied, the triggers modify content on other pages or optional content layers without explicit warning. This can cause the signed PDF to differ from what the signer saw, undermining the trustworthiness of the digital signature. The fixed versions are 2025.2.1, 14.0.1, and 13.2.1. | |||||
| CVE-2025-59802 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Macos, Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Foxit PDF Editor and Reader before 2025.2.1 allow signature spoofing via OCG. When Optional Content Groups (OCG) are supported, the state property of an OCG is runtime-only and not included in the digital signature computation buffer. An attacker can leverage JavaScript or PDF triggers to dynamically change the visibility of OCG content after signing (Post-Sign), allowing the visual content of a signed PDF to be modified without invalidating the signature. This may result in a mismatch between the signed content and what the signer or verifier sees, undermining the trustworthiness of the digital signature. The fixed versions are 2025.2.1, 14.0.1, and 13.2.1. | |||||
| CVE-2025-55314 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows and macOS before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. When pages in a PDF are deleted via JavaScript, the application may fail to properly update internal states. Subsequent annotation management operations assume these states are valid, causing dereference of invalid or released memory. This can lead to memory corruption, application crashes, and potentially allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2025-55313 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Macos, Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows and macOS before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. They allow potential arbitrary code execution when processing crafted PDF files. The vulnerability stems from insufficient handling of memory allocation failures after assigning an extremely large value to a form field's charLimit property via JavaScript. This can result in memory corruption and may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code by persuading a user to open a malicious file. | |||||
| CVE-2025-55312 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Macos, Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. When pages in a PDF are deleted via JavaScript, the application may fail to properly update internal states. Subsequent annotation management operations assume these states are valid, causing dereference of invalid or released memory. This can lead to memory corruption, application crashes, and potentially allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2025-55311 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Macos, Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows and macOS before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. A crafted PDF can use JavaScript to alter annotation content and subsequently clear the file's modification status via JavaScript interfaces. This circumvents digital signature verification by hiding document modifications, allowing an attacker to mislead users about the document's integrity and compromise the trustworthiness of signed PDFs. | |||||
| CVE-2025-55310 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Macos, Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows and macOS before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. An attacker able to alter or replace the static HTML files used by the StartPage feature can cause the application to load malicious or compromised content upon startup. This may result in information disclosure, unauthorized data access, or other security impacts. | |||||
| CVE-2025-55309 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Macos, Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows and macOS before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. A crafted PDF can contain JavaScript that attaches an OnBlur action on a form field that destroys an annotation. During user right-click interaction, the program's internal focus change handling prematurely releases the annotation object, resulting in a use-after-free vulnerability that may cause memory corruption or application crashes. | |||||
| CVE-2025-55308 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. A crafted PDF containing JavaScript that calls closeDoc() while internal objects are still in use can cause premature release of these objects. This use-after-free vulnerability may lead to memory corruption, potentially resulting in information disclosure when the PDF is opened. | |||||