Total
363954 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-55962 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| TLS 1.3 post-handshake authentication (PHA) issue where a server could accept a client's Finished message without the client having sent a Certificate and CertificateVerify. The post-handshake-auth exemption that allows an empty/absent peer certificate was only intended for the initial handshake, but it was also being applied while a post-handshake CertificateRequest was still outstanding. The check is now scoped to the initial handshake only: on the server, once a post-handshake CertificateRequest has been sent (certReqCtx is set), a peer certificate and a valid CertificateVerify are required again before the Finished is accepted, with empty-certificate handling following the configured verify mode (FAIL_IF_NO_PEER_CERT) just as during first-handshake client authentication. Only affects TLS 1.3 servers built with post-handshake authentication support (WOLFSSL_POST_HANDSHAKE_AUTH / --enable-postauth, included in --enable-all) that enable WOLFSSL_VERIFY_POST_HANDSHAKE and request a client certificate after the handshake via wolfSSL_request_certificate(). Clients, and servers that do not use post-handshake authentication, are unaffected. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6092 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| When HAVE_ENCRYPT_THEN_MAC is configured, the implementation could fall back to MAC-then-Encrypt rather than enforcing Encrypt-then-MAC. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6325 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Out-of-bounds write in SetSuitesHashSigAlgo when processing an oversized signature algorithms list, allowing a write past the bounds of the destination buffer. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6329 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| PKCS#12 MAC verification uses an attacker-controlled comparison length, weakening the integrity check on the MAC and allowing a mismatched MAC to be accepted. The PKCS#12 verify path compared the locally computed HMAC against the MAC parsed from the PKCS#12 structure using a length taken directly from the attacker-supplied input, without first verifying that it equals the length of the digest actually produced by the configured algorithm. A truncated or zero-length stored MAC could therefore be accepted, defeating the integrity protection of the MAC. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6330 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input, breaking the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform's implicit rejection and weakening IND-CCA2 security on that code path. The constant-time comparison effectively ignored part of the re-encrypted ciphertext, so a decapsulating party could fail to detect a manipulated ciphertext and proceed without the standard's required implicit rejection. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6331 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| HMAC zero-length tag forgery in EVP_DigestVerifyFinal, where a zero-length tag could be accepted as valid during HMAC verification. In the OpenSSL-compatibility HMAC verify path the supplied signature length was only checked as not exceeding the MAC length, so a zero-length or otherwise truncated tag could pass verification. The fix requires the supplied tag length to exactly equal the MAC length and rejects a zero-length MAC, so a forged short or empty tag is no longer accepted. | |||||
| CVE-2026-7511 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| PKCS7_verify signer confusion allows forged signatures, where the signer associated with a signature is not correctly bound, permitting a forged signature to be accepted. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8720 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| wc_Blake2bHmacFinal and wc_Blake2sHmacFinal discard the message when the key length exceeds the block size, producing a MAC that is independent of the input. When the supplied key is longer than the BLAKE2 block size the key-hashing branch reinitialized the running hash state, discarding the accumulated message data, so the resulting MAC depended only on the key and not on the message being authenticated. This bug is specific to the HMAC-BLAKE2 APIs that were added in wolfSSL version 5.9.0. | |||||
| CVE-2026-2053 | 1 Wso2 | 1 Api Manager | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 8.3 HIGH |
| The WSO2 API Manager's message flow component, when processing WS-Addressing headers, does not sufficiently validate or restrict user-controlled input within these headers. This omission allows an attacker to manipulate WS-Addressing headers to specify arbitrary destinations for server-initiated requests. Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated attacker to control the destination of server-initiated requests originating from the WSO2 API Manager. This direct control can enable unauthorized access to internal network resources or services that would typically be inaccessible from external networks. | |||||
| CVE-2026-53914 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Kotlin | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| In JetBrains Kotlin before 2.4.20 code execution was possible via unsafe deserialization in the build cache metadata | |||||
| CVE-2026-57921 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.16593 improper access control allowed reading users' private data via the comment templates endpoint | |||||
| CVE-2026-57922 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 3.1 LOW |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.16593 project settings disclosure via the MCP was possible | |||||
| CVE-2026-57923 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.16593 improper authorisation in the app configurations endpoint allowed modifying project settings | |||||
| CVE-2026-57924 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.16593 default role configuration exposed excessive user profile details | |||||
| CVE-2026-57925 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.16593 improper access control allowed reading saved queries and tags | |||||
| CVE-2026-9153 | 2 Gnu, Linux | 2 Sed, Linux Kernel | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Arbitrary File Read vulnerability in Rapid7 InsightConnect Sed Plugin on Linux allows authenticated attackers to read arbitrary files via the expression parameter due to insufficient input validation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-9154 | 2 Gnu, Linux | 2 Sed, Linux Kernel | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| Arbitrary File Write vulnerability in Rapid7 InsightConnect Sed Plugin on Linux allows authenticated attackers to write attacker-controlled content to arbitrary file paths via the expression parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2026-9155 | 2 Gnu, Linux | 2 Sed, Linux Kernel | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| OS Command Injection vulnerability in Rapid7 InsightConnect Sed Plugin on Linux allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via the expression parameter due to insufficient input validation. | |||||
| CVE-2026-9779 | 1 Aten | 1 Unizon | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| ATEN Unizon doCryptoHugeFileToFile Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of ATEN Unizon. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the updateWar method. The issue results from an incorrect implementation of cryptographic signature verification. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-28590. | |||||
| CVE-2026-9778 | 1 Aten | 1 Unizon | 2026-06-27 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| ATEN Unizon ImportDeviceList Directory Traversal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of ATEN Unizon. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the ImportDeviceList method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied path prior to using it in file operations. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-28579. | |||||