Filtered by vendor Splunk
Subscribe
Total
264 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2010-3322 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-04-29 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The XML parser in Splunk 4.0.0 through 4.1.4 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information and gain privileges via an XML External Entity (XXE) attack to unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2012-1908 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-04-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Splunk 4.0 through 4.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2012-6447 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-04-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Splunk Web in Splunk 5.0.0 through 5.0.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2010-2502 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-04-29 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in Splunk 4.0 through 4.0.10 and 4.1 through 4.1.1 allow (1) remote attackers to read arbitrary files, aka SPL-31194; (2) remote authenticated users to modify arbitrary files, aka SPL-31063; or (3) have an unknown impact via redirects, aka SPL-31067. | |||||
| CVE-2011-4643 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-04-29 | 4.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in Splunk 4.x before 4.2.5 allow remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in a URI to (1) Splunk Web or (2) the Splunkd HTTP Server, aka SPL-45243. | |||||
| CVE-2010-2504 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-04-29 | 6.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Splunk 4.0 through 4.0.10 and 4.1 through 4.1.1 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via HTTP header injection, aka SPL-31066. | |||||
| CVE-2010-2503 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-04-29 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Splunk 4.0 through 4.0.10 and 4.1 through 4.1.1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) redirects, aka SPL-31067; (2) unspecified "user->user or user->admin" vectors, aka SPL-31084; or (3) unspecified "user input," aka SPL-31085. | |||||
| CVE-2010-3323 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk | 2026-04-29 | 4.6 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Splunk 4.0.0 through 4.1.4 allows remote attackers to conduct session hijacking attacks and obtain the splunkd session key via vectors related to the SPLUNKD_SESSION_KEY parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0160 | 13 Broadcom, Canonical, Debian and 10 more | 35 Symantec Messaging Gateway, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 32 more | 2026-04-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. | |||||
| CVE-2026-20202 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2026-04-17 | N/A | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.2, 10.0.5, 9.4.10, and 9.3.11, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.4.2603.0, 10.3.2512.6, 10.2.2510.10, 10.1.2507.20, 10.0.2503.13, and 9.3.2411.127, a user who holds a role that contains the high-privilege capability `edit_user`could create a specially crafted username that includes a null byte or a non-UTF-8 percent-encoded byte due to improper input validation.<br><br>This could lead to inconsistent conversion of usernames into a proper format for storage and account management inconsistencies, such as being unable to edit or delete affected users. | |||||
| CVE-2026-20203 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2026-04-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.2, 10.0.5, 9.4.10, and 9.3.11, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.4.2603.0, 10.3.2512.6, 10.2.2510.10, 10.1.2507.19, 10.0.2503.13, and 9.3.2411.127, a low-privileged user that does not hold the `admin` or `power` Splunk roles, has write permission on the app, and does not hold the high-privilege capability `accelerate_datamodel`, could turn on or off Data Model Acceleration due to improper access control. | |||||
| CVE-2026-20204 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2026-04-17 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.1, 10.0.5, 9.4.10, and 9.3.11, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.4.2603.0, 10.3.2512.5, 10.2.2510.9, 10.1.2507.19, 10.0.2503.13, and 9.3.2411.127, a low-privileged user that does not hold the `admin` or `power` Splunk roles could potentially perform a Remote Code Execution (RCE) by uploading a malicious file to the `$SPLUNK_HOME/var/run/splunk/apptemp` directory due to improper handling and insufficient isolation of temporary files within the `apptemp` directory. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22925 | 7 Apple, Fedoraproject, Haxx and 4 more | 27 Mac Os X, Macos, Fedora and 24 more | 2026-04-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| curl supports the `-t` command line option, known as `CURLOPT_TELNETOPTIONS`in libcurl. This rarely used option is used to send variable=content pairs toTELNET servers.Due to flaw in the option parser for sending `NEW_ENV` variables, libcurlcould be made to pass on uninitialized data from a stack based buffer to theserver. Therefore potentially revealing sensitive internal information to theserver using a clear-text network protocol.This could happen because curl did not call and use sscanf() correctly whenparsing the string provided by the application. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22947 | 8 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 34 Macos, Debian Linux, Fedora and 31 more | 2026-04-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| When curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 connects to an IMAP or POP3 server to retrieve data using STARTTLS to upgrade to TLS security, the server can respond and send back multiple responses at once that curl caches. curl would then upgrade to TLS but not flush the in-queue of cached responses but instead continue using and trustingthe responses it got *before* the TLS handshake as if they were authenticated.Using this flaw, it allows a Man-In-The-Middle attacker to first inject the fake responses, then pass-through the TLS traffic from the legitimate server and trick curl into sending data back to the user thinking the attacker's injected data comes from the TLS-protected server. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22946 | 8 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 5 more | 37 Macos, Debian Linux, Fedora and 34 more | 2026-04-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A user can tell curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 to require a successful upgrade to TLS when speaking to an IMAP, POP3 or FTP server (`--ssl-reqd` on the command line or`CURLOPT_USE_SSL` set to `CURLUSESSL_CONTROL` or `CURLUSESSL_ALL` withlibcurl). This requirement could be bypassed if the server would return a properly crafted but perfectly legitimate response.This flaw would then make curl silently continue its operations **withoutTLS** contrary to the instructions and expectations, exposing possibly sensitive data in clear text over the network. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22922 | 6 Fedoraproject, Haxx, Netapp and 3 more | 23 Fedora, Curl, Cloud Backup and 20 more | 2026-04-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| When curl is instructed to download content using the metalink feature, thecontents is verified against a hash provided in the metalink XML file.The metalink XML file points out to the client how to get the same contentfrom a set of different URLs, potentially hosted by different servers and theclient can then download the file from one or several of them. In a serial orparallel manner.If one of the servers hosting the contents has been breached and the contentsof the specific file on that server is replaced with a modified payload, curlshould detect this when the hash of the file mismatches after a completeddownload. It should remove the contents and instead try getting the contentsfrom another URL. This is not done, and instead such a hash mismatch is onlymentioned in text and the potentially malicious content is kept in the file ondisk. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8285 | 9 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 6 more | 30 Mac Os X, Macos, Debian Linux and 27 more | 2026-04-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| curl 7.21.0 to and including 7.73.0 is vulnerable to uncontrolled recursion due to a stack overflow issue in FTP wildcard match parsing. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8284 | 9 Apple, Debian, Fedoraproject and 6 more | 29 Mac Os X, Macos, Debian Linux and 26 more | 2026-04-16 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| A malicious server can use the FTP PASV response to trick curl 7.73.0 and earlier into connecting back to a given IP address and port, and this way potentially make curl extract information about services that are otherwise private and not disclosed, for example doing port scanning and service banner extractions. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22898 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Haxx and 3 more | 12 Debian Linux, Fedora, Curl and 9 more | 2026-04-16 | 2.6 LOW | 3.1 LOW |
| curl 7.7 through 7.76.1 suffers from an information disclosure when the `-t` command line option, known as `CURLOPT_TELNETOPTIONS` in libcurl, is used to send variable=content pairs to TELNET servers. Due to a flaw in the option parser for sending NEW_ENV variables, libcurl could be made to pass on uninitialized data from a stack based buffer to the server, resulting in potentially revealing sensitive internal information to the server using a clear-text network protocol. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8177 | 5 Debian, Fujitsu, Haxx and 2 more | 16 Debian Linux, M10-1, M10-1 Firmware and 13 more | 2026-04-15 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| curl 7.20.0 through 7.70.0 is vulnerable to improper restriction of names for files and other resources that can lead too overwriting a local file when the -J flag is used. | |||||