Filtered by vendor Checkpoint
Subscribe
Total
119 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2001-1303 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
The default configuration of SecuRemote for Check Point Firewall-1 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive configuration information for the protected network without authentication. | |||||
CVE-2004-0040 | 1 Checkpoint | 2 Firewall-1, Vpn-1 | 2025-04-03 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
Stack-based buffer overflow in Check Point VPN-1 Server 4.1 through 4.1 SP6 and Check Point SecuRemote/SecureClient 4.1 through 4.1 build 4200 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an ISAKMP packet with a large Certificate Request packet. | |||||
CVE-2005-4093 | 1 Checkpoint | 2 Secureclient Ng, Vpn-1 Secureclient | 2025-04-03 | 6.5 MEDIUM | N/A |
Check Point VPN-1 SecureClient NG with Application Intelligence R56, NG FP1, 4.0, and 4.1 allows remote attackers to bypass security policies by modifying the local copy of the local.scv policy file after it has been downloaded from the VPN Endpoint. | |||||
CVE-2002-0428 | 1 Checkpoint | 3 Check Point Vpn, Firewall-1, Next Generation | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
Check Point FireWall-1 SecuRemote/SecuClient 4.0 and 4.1 allows clients to bypass the "authentication timeout" by modifying the to_expire or expire values in the client's users.C configuration file. | |||||
CVE-2005-2313 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Secureclient Ng | 2025-04-03 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
Check Point SecuRemote NG with Application Intelligence R54 allows attackers to obtain credentials and gain privileges via unknown attack vectors. | |||||
CVE-2000-0779 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
Checkpoint Firewall-1 with the RSH/REXEC setting enabled allows remote attackers to bypass access restrictions and connect to a RSH/REXEC client via malformed connection requests. | |||||
CVE-2001-1176 | 1 Checkpoint | 3 Firewall-1, Provider-1, Vpn-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
Format string vulnerability in Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 allows a remote authenticated firewall administrator to execute arbitrary code via format strings in the control connection. | |||||
CVE-2000-0804 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass the directionality check via fragmented TCP connection requests or reopening closed TCP connection requests, aka "One-way Connection Enforcement Bypass." | |||||
CVE-2000-1037 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
Check Point Firewall-1 session agent 3.0 through 4.1 generates different error messages for invalid user names versus invalid passwords, which allows remote attackers to determine valid usernames and guess a password via a brute force attack. | |||||
CVE-2000-0806 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
The inter-module authentication mechanism (fwa1) in Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier may allow remote attackers to conduct a denial of service, aka "Inter-module Communications Bypass." | |||||
CVE-2001-1102 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 6.2 MEDIUM | N/A |
Check Point FireWall-1 3.0b through 4.1 for Solaris allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on temporary policy files that end in a .cpp extension, which are set world-writable. | |||||
CVE-1999-0675 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
Check Point FireWall-1 can be subjected to a denial of service via UDP packets that are sent through VPN-1 to port 0 of a host. | |||||
CVE-2004-0081 | 23 4d, Apple, Avaya and 20 more | 66 Webstar, Mac Os X, Mac Os X Server and 63 more | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
OpenSSL 0.9.6 before 0.9.6d does not properly handle unknown message types, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop), as demonstrated using the Codenomicon TLS Test Tool. | |||||
CVE-2000-0805 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier improperly retransmits encapsulated FWS packets, even if they do not come from a valid FWZ client, aka "Retransmission of Encapsulated Packets." | |||||
CVE-1999-1204 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
Check Point Firewall-1 does not properly handle certain restricted keywords (e.g., Mail, auth, time) in user-defined objects, which could produce a rule with a default "ANY" address and result in access to more systems than intended by the administrator. | |||||
CVE-2006-3885 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
Directory traversal vulnerability in Check Point Firewall-1 R55W before HFA03 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via an encoded .. (dot dot) in the URL on TCP port 18264. | |||||
CVE-1999-0770 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
Firewall-1 sets a long timeout for connections that begin with ACK or other packets except SYN, allowing an attacker to conduct a denial of service via a large number of connection attempts to unresponsive systems. | |||||
CVE-2001-1499 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Vpn-1 | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
Check Point VPN-1 4.1SP4 using SecuRemote returns different error messages for valid and invalid users, with prompts that vary depending on the authentication method being used, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct brute force attacks. | |||||
CVE-2000-0809 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
Buffer overflow in Getkey in the protocol checker in the inter-module communication mechanism in Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service. | |||||
CVE-2005-3673 | 1 Checkpoint | 5 Check Point, Express, Firewall-1 and 2 more | 2025-04-03 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
The Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) implementation in Check Point products allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via certain crafted IKE packets, as demonstrated by the PROTOS ISAKMP Test Suite for IKEv1. NOTE: due to the lack of details in the advisory, it is unclear which of CVE-2005-3666, CVE-2005-3667, and/or CVE-2005-3668 this issue applies to. |