Total
76 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-37055 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Deserialization of untrusted data can occur in versions of the MLflow platform running version 1.24.0 or newer, enabling a maliciously uploaded pmdarima model to run arbitrary code on an end user’s system when interacted with. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37054 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Deserialization of untrusted data can occur in versions of the MLflow platform running version 0.9.0 or newer, enabling a maliciously uploaded PyFunc model to run arbitrary code on an end user’s system when interacted with. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37053 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Deserialization of untrusted data can occur in versions of the MLflow platform running version 1.1.0 or newer, enabling a maliciously uploaded scikit-learn model to run arbitrary code on an end user’s system when interacted with. | |||||
| CVE-2024-37052 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Deserialization of untrusted data can occur in versions of the MLflow platform running version 1.1.0 or newer, enabling a maliciously uploaded scikit-learn model to run arbitrary code on an end user’s system when interacted with. | |||||
| CVE-2024-2928 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability was identified in mlflow/mlflow, specifically in version 2.9.2, which was fixed in version 2.11.3. This vulnerability arises from the application's failure to properly validate URI fragments for directory traversal sequences such as '../'. An attacker can exploit this flaw by manipulating the fragment part of the URI to read arbitrary files on the local file system, including sensitive files like '/etc/passwd'. The vulnerability is a bypass to a previous patch that only addressed similar manipulation within the URI's query string, highlighting the need for comprehensive validation of all parts of a URI to prevent LFI attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2024-27134 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.0 HIGH |
| Excessive directory permissions in MLflow leads to local privilege escalation when using spark_udf. This behavior can be exploited by a local attacker to gain elevated permissions by using a ToCToU attack. The issue is only relevant when the spark_udf() MLflow API is called. | |||||
| CVE-2024-27133 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Insufficient sanitization in MLflow leads to XSS when running a recipe that uses an untrusted dataset. This issue leads to a client-side RCE when running the recipe in Jupyter Notebook. The vulnerability stems from lack of sanitization over dataset table fields. | |||||
| CVE-2024-27132 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Insufficient sanitization in MLflow leads to XSS when running an untrusted recipe. This issue leads to a client-side RCE when running an untrusted recipe in Jupyter Notebook. The vulnerability stems from lack of sanitization over template variables. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1594 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in the mlflow/mlflow repository, specifically within the handling of the `artifact_location` parameter when creating an experiment. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by using a fragment component `#` in the artifact location URI to read arbitrary files on the server in the context of the server's process. This issue is similar to CVE-2023-6909 but utilizes a different component of the URI to achieve the same effect. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1593 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in the mlflow/mlflow repository due to improper handling of URL parameters. By smuggling path traversal sequences using the ';' character in URLs, attackers can manipulate the 'params' portion of the URL to gain unauthorized access to files or directories. This vulnerability allows for arbitrary data smuggling into the 'params' part of the URL, enabling attacks similar to those described in previous reports but utilizing the ';' character for parameter smuggling. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized information disclosure or server compromise. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1560 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in the mlflow/mlflow repository, specifically within the artifact deletion functionality. Attackers can bypass path validation by exploiting the double decoding process in the `_delete_artifact_mlflow_artifacts` handler and `local_file_uri_to_path` function, allowing for the deletion of arbitrary directories on the server's filesystem. This vulnerability is due to an extra unquote operation in the `delete_artifacts` function of `local_artifact_repo.py`, which fails to properly sanitize user-supplied paths. The issue is present up to version 2.9.2, despite attempts to fix a similar issue in CVE-2023-6831. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1558 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in the `_create_model_version()` function within `server/handlers.py` of the mlflow/mlflow repository, due to improper validation of the `source` parameter. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by crafting a `source` parameter that bypasses the `_validate_non_local_source_contains_relative_paths(source)` function's checks, allowing for arbitrary file read access on the server. The issue arises from the handling of unquoted URL characters and the subsequent misuse of the original `source` value for model version creation, leading to the exposure of sensitive files when interacting with the `/model-versions/get-artifact` handler. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1483 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in mlflow/mlflow version 2.9.2, allowing attackers to access arbitrary files on the server. By crafting a series of HTTP POST requests with specially crafted 'artifact_location' and 'source' parameters, using a local URI with '#' instead of '?', an attacker can traverse the server's directory structure. The issue occurs due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input in the server's handlers. | |||||
| CVE-2024-0520 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in mlflow/mlflow version 8.2.1 allows for remote code execution due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('Command Injection') within the `mlflow.data.http_dataset_source.py` module. Specifically, when loading a dataset from a source URL with an HTTP scheme, the filename extracted from the `Content-Disposition` header or the URL path is used to generate the final file path without proper sanitization. This flaw enables an attacker to control the file path fully by utilizing path traversal or absolute path techniques, such as '../../tmp/poc.txt' or '/tmp/poc.txt', leading to arbitrary file write. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow a malicious user to execute commands on the vulnerable machine, potentially gaining access to data and model information. The issue is fixed in version 2.9.0. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6977 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| This vulnerability enables malicious users to read sensitive files on the server. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6976 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability is capable of writing arbitrary files into arbitrary locations on the remote filesystem in the context of the server process. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6975 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A malicious user could use this issue to get command execution on the vulnerable machine and get access to data & models information. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6974 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A malicious user could use this issue to access internal HTTP(s) servers and in the worst case (ie: aws instance) it could be abuse to get a remote code execution on the victim machine. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6940 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| with only one user interaction(download a malicious config), attackers can gain full command execution on the victim system. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6909 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Path Traversal: '\..\filename' in GitHub repository mlflow/mlflow prior to 2.9.2. | |||||