Total
8649 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-32321 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In isSafeIntent of AccountTypePreferenceLoader.java, there is a possible way to bypass an intent type check due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32323 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In getCallingAppName of Shared.java, there is a possible way to trick users into granting file access via deceptive text in a permission popup due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32324 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In onCommand of ActivityManagerShellCommand.java, there is a possible arbitrary activity launch due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32325 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In appendFrom of Parcel.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32326 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple functions of AppRestrictionsFragment.java, there is a possible way to bypass intent security check due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32327 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple functions of PickerDbFacade.java, there is a possible unauthorized data access due to SQL injection. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32330 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 5.7 MEDIUM |
| In generateRandomPassword of LocalBluetoothLeBroadcast.java, there is a possible way to intercept the Auracast audio stream due to an insecure default value. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32331 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In showDismissibleKeyguard of KeyguardService.java, there is a possible way to bypass app pinning due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32332 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible memory corruption due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32333 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In startSpaActivityForApp of SpaActivity.kt, there is a possible cross-user permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32346 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In onActivityResult of VoicemailSettingsActivity.java, there is a possible work profile contact number leak due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32347 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In onStart of BiometricEnrollIntroduction.java, there is a possible way to determine the device's location due to an unsafe PendingIntent. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32349 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible privilege escalation due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32350 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In maybeShowDialog of ControlsSettingsDialogManager.kt, there is a possible overlay of the ControlsSettingsDialog due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48524 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In isSystem of WifiPermissionsUtil.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48560 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In AndroidManifest.xml, there is a possible way for an app to monitor motion events due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48563 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In onNullBinding of RemoteFillService.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-48581 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In VerifyNoOverlapInSessions of apexd.cpp, there is a possible way to block security updates through mainline installations due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-40664 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 6.2 MEDIUM |
| In setupAccessibilityServices of AccessibilityFragment.java , there is a possible way to hide an enabled accessibility service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-3067 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2025-09-08 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Inappropriate implementation in Custom Tabs in Google Chrome on Android prior to 135.0.7049.52 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform privilege escalation via a crafted app. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||