Filtered by vendor Hcltech
Subscribe
Total
447 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-4301 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Self-service Application | 2026-06-17 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 8.4 HIGH |
| BigFix Self-Service Application (SSA) is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution if Javascript code is included in Running Message or Post Message HTML. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4209 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Connections | 2026-06-17 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| HCL Connections v5.5, v6.0, and v6.5 contains an open redirect vulnerability which could be exploited by an attacker to conduct phishing attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4091 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Marketing Campaign | 2026-06-17 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| "HCL Marketing Platform is vulnerable to cross-site scripting during addition of new users and also while searching for users in Dashboard, potentially giving an attacker ability to inject malicious code into the system. " | |||||
| CVE-2019-4090 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Marketing Campaign | 2026-06-17 | 3.5 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| "HCL Campaign is vulnerable to cross-site scripting when a user provides XSS scripts in Campaign Description field." | |||||
| CVE-2019-16188 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Appscan Source | 2026-06-17 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| HCL AppScan Source before 9.03.13 is susceptible to XML External Entity (XXE) attacks in multiple locations. In particular, an attacker can send a specially crafted .ozasmt file to a targeted victim and ask the victim to open it. When the victim imports the .ozasmt file in AppScan Source, the content of any file in the local file system (to which the victim as read access) can be exfiltrated to a remote listener under the attacker's control. The product does not disable external XML Entity Processing, which can lead to information disclosure and denial of services attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11518 | 1 Hcltech | 2 Legacy Ivr, Legacy Ivr Firmware | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| A vulnerability allows a phreaking attack on HCL legacy IVR systems that do not use VoIP. These IVR systems rely on various frequencies of audio signals; based on the frequency, certain commands and functions are processed. Since these frequencies are accepted within a phone call, an attacker can record these frequencies and use them for service activations. This is a request-forgery issue when the required series of DTMF signals for a service activation is predictable (e.g., the IVR system does not speak a nonce to the caller). In this case, the IVR system accepts an activation request from a less-secure channel (any loudspeaker in the caller's physical environment) without verifying that the request was intended (it matches a nonce sent over a more-secure channel to the caller's earpiece). | |||||
| CVE-2017-1712 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Domino | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| "A vulnerability in the TLS protocol implementation of the Domino server could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to access sensitive information, aka a Return of Bleichenbacher's Oracle Threat (ROBOT) attack. An attacker could iteratively query a server running a vulnerable TLS stack implementation to perform cryptanalytic operations that may allow decryption of previously captured TLS sessions." | |||||