Filtered by vendor Samba
Subscribe
Total
230 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-2855 | 1 Samba | 1 Rsync | 2025-04-12 | 7.8 HIGH | N/A |
| The check_secret function in authenticate.c in rsync 3.1.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and CPU consumption) via a user name which does not exist in the secrets file. | |||||
| CVE-2015-5330 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| ldb before 1.1.24, as used in the AD LDAP server in Samba 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3, mishandles string lengths, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from daemon heap memory by sending crafted packets and then reading (1) an error message or (2) a database value. | |||||
| CVE-2013-4496 | 2 Canonical, Samba | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Samba | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Samba 3.x before 3.6.23, 4.0.x before 4.0.16, and 4.1.x before 4.1.6 does not enforce the password-guessing protection mechanism for all interfaces, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via brute-force ChangePasswordUser2 (1) SAMR or (2) RAP attempts. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7560 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Samba | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Samba | 2025-04-12 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The SMB1 implementation in smbd in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.1.23, 4.2.x before 4.2.9, 4.3.x before 4.3.6, and 4.4.x before 4.4.0rc4 allows remote authenticated users to modify arbitrary ACLs by using a UNIX SMB1 call to create a symlink, and then using a non-UNIX SMB1 call to write to the ACL content. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0244 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2025-04-12 | 3.3 LOW | N/A |
| The sys_recvfrom function in nmbd in Samba 3.6.x before 3.6.24, 4.0.x before 4.0.19, and 4.1.x before 4.1.9 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and CPU consumption) via a malformed UDP packet. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2110 | 2 Canonical, Samba | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Samba | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The NTLMSSP authentication implementation in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to perform protocol-downgrade attacks by modifying the client-server data stream to remove application-layer flags or encryption settings, as demonstrated by clearing the NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SEAL or NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN option to disrupt LDAP security. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7540 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Samba | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Samba | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The LDAP server in the AD domain controller in Samba 4.x before 4.1.22 does not check return values to ensure successful ASN.1 memory allocation, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and daemon crash) via crafted packets. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2115 | 2 Canonical, Samba | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Samba | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not require SMB signing within a DCERPC session over ncacn_np, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SMB clients by modifying the client-server data stream. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2119 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2025-04-12 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| libcli/smb/smbXcli_base.c in Samba 4.x before 4.2.14, 4.3.x before 4.3.11, and 4.4.x before 4.4.5 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass a client-signing protection mechanism, and consequently spoof SMB2 and SMB3 servers, via the (1) SMB2_SESSION_FLAG_IS_GUEST or (2) SMB2_SESSION_FLAG_IS_NULL flag. | |||||
| CVE-2015-5252 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Samba | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Samba | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| vfs.c in smbd in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3, when share names with certain substring relationships exist, allows remote attackers to bypass intended file-access restrictions via a symlink that points outside of a share. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0239 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The internal DNS server in Samba 4.x before 4.0.18 does not check the QR field in the header section of an incoming DNS message before sending a response, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU and bandwidth consumption) via a forged response packet that triggers a communication loop, a related issue to CVE-1999-0103. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0771 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2025-04-12 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The internal DNS server in Samba 4.x before 4.1.23, 4.2.x before 4.2.9, 4.3.x before 4.3.6, and 4.4.x before 4.4.0rc4, when an AD DC is configured, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) or possibly obtain sensitive information from process memory by uploading a crafted DNS TXT record. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2113 | 2 Canonical, Samba | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Samba | 2025-04-12 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| Samba 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not verify X.509 certificates from TLS servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof LDAPS and HTTPS servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2111 | 2 Canonical, Samba | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Samba | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| The NETLOGON service in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2, when a domain controller is configured, allows remote attackers to spoof the computer name of a secure channel's endpoint, and obtain sensitive session information, by running a crafted application and leveraging the ability to sniff network traffic, a related issue to CVE-2015-0005. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2112 | 2 Canonical, Samba | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Samba | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The bundled LDAP client library in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not recognize the "client ldap sasl wrapping" setting, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to perform LDAP protocol-downgrade attacks by modifying the client-server data stream. | |||||
| CVE-2015-5299 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Samba | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Samba | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The shadow_copy2_get_shadow_copy_data function in modules/vfs_shadow_copy2.c in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3 does not verify that the DIRECTORY_LIST access right has been granted, which allows remote attackers to access snapshots by visiting a shadow copy directory. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0178 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2025-04-12 | 3.5 LOW | N/A |
| Samba 3.6.6 through 3.6.23, 4.0.x before 4.0.18, and 4.1.x before 4.1.8, when a certain vfs shadow copy configuration is enabled, does not properly initialize the SRV_SNAPSHOT_ARRAY response field, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a (1) FSCTL_GET_SHADOW_COPY_DATA or (2) FSCTL_SRV_ENUMERATE_SNAPSHOTS request. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2118 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Samba | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Samba | 2025-04-12 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The MS-SAMR and MS-LSAD protocol implementations in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 mishandle DCERPC connections, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to perform protocol-downgrade attacks and impersonate users by modifying the client-server data stream, aka "BADLOCK." | |||||
| CVE-2014-3493 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2025-04-12 | 2.7 LOW | N/A |
| The push_ascii function in smbd in Samba 3.6.x before 3.6.24, 4.0.x before 4.0.19, and 4.1.x before 4.1.9 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and daemon crash) via an attempt to read a Unicode pathname without specifying use of Unicode, leading to a character-set conversion failure that triggers an invalid pointer dereference. | |||||
| CVE-2013-6442 | 1 Samba | 1 Samba | 2025-04-12 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The owner_set function in smbcacls.c in smbcacls in Samba 4.0.x before 4.0.16 and 4.1.x before 4.1.6 removes an ACL during use of a --chown or --chgrp option, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions in opportunistic circumstances by leveraging an unintended administrative change. | |||||