Total
24 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-18634 | 2 Debian, Sudo Project | 2 Debian Linux, Sudo | 2024-11-21 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Sudo before 1.8.26, if pwfeedback is enabled in /etc/sudoers, users can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow in the privileged sudo process. (pwfeedback is a default setting in Linux Mint and elementary OS; however, it is NOT the default for upstream and many other packages, and would exist only if enabled by an administrator.) The attacker needs to deliver a long string to the stdin of getln() in tgetpass.c. | |||||
| CVE-2019-14287 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 15 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 12 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Sudo before 1.8.28, an attacker with access to a Runas ALL sudoer account can bypass certain policy blacklists and session PAM modules, and can cause incorrect logging, by invoking sudo with a crafted user ID. For example, this allows bypass of !root configuration, and USER= logging, for a "sudo -u \#$((0xffffffff))" command. | |||||
| CVE-2016-7076 | 1 Sudo Project | 1 Sudo | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| sudo before version 1.8.18p1 is vulnerable to a bypass in the sudo noexec restriction if application run via sudo executed wordexp() C library function with a user supplied argument. A local user permitted to run such application via sudo with noexec restriction could possibly use this flaw to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2005-4890 | 3 Debian, Redhat, Sudo Project | 4 Debian Linux, Shadow, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| There is a possible tty hijacking in shadow 4.x before 4.1.5 and sudo 1.x before 1.7.4 via "su - user -c program". The user session can be escaped to the parent session by using the TIOCSTI ioctl to push characters into the input buffer to be read by the next process. | |||||