Total
292444 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-1999-1056 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-1395. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-1999-1395. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-1395 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-1999-0617 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The SMTP service is running. | |||||
| CVE-2003-0598 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0657. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0657. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0657 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-1999-0020 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-0032. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-1999-0032. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-0032 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2003-0790 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: the reported issue is not a vulnerability or exposure. Notes: This candidate was assigned to a "head-reading" bug in a component of fetchmail 6.2.4 and earlier, which was claimed to allow a denial of service. However, the bug is in a broken component of fetchmail that is not "reachable" by any execution path, so it cannot be triggered by any sort of attack and is not exploitable | |||||
| CVE-1999-0622 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A component service related to DNS service is running. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0615 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The SNMP service is running. | |||||
| CVE-2002-2157 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1660. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1660. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1660 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2003-1047 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-0540. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2004-0540. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-0540 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2004-1242 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2004. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2003-0090 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2000-0844. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2000-0844. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2000-0844 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2003-0157 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0138. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0138 due to incomplete coordination. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0138 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2002-2151 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1651. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1651. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1651 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2003-0158 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0139. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0139 due to incomplete coordination. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0139 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2002-1161 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1380. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1380. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-1999-0658 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "DCOM is running. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0644 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The NNTP news service is running. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0531 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "An SMTP service supports EXPN, VRFY, HELP, ESMTP, and/or EHLO. | |||||
| CVE-2004-1886 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2004-1848. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2004-1848. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2004-1848 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2004-1243 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2004. Notes: none | |||||